A recently closed thread began (IMHO) with a misleading agenda to present the Baptist view of the Lord's Supper as idolatrous. Many posters adequately refuted that assertion. Because I believe the topic is important, I want to provide insight on how the Reformers (including our 16th and 17th century Particular Baptist brethren) viewed this.
They believed images of Christ to be a popish invention and a violation of the 2nd commandment. They believed the Roman Catholic mass was heretical because of transubstantiation. They did not believe that observing the Lord's Supper as a memorial was idolatry because the elements in the Lord's Supper were never to be viewed as an image of God. The elements are used for remembrance (Luke 22:19).
For more detail visit the following link to the appropriate chapter in the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession of Faith: 1689 LBC: Chapter 30: "Of the Lord's Supper"
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
They believed images of Christ to be a popish invention and a violation of the 2nd commandment. They believed the Roman Catholic mass was heretical because of transubstantiation. They did not believe that observing the Lord's Supper as a memorial was idolatry because the elements in the Lord's Supper were never to be viewed as an image of God. The elements are used for remembrance (Luke 22:19).
For more detail visit the following link to the appropriate chapter in the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession of Faith: 1689 LBC: Chapter 30: "Of the Lord's Supper"
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk