• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

IMO, the final throes of this drawn out facade....

Status
Not open for further replies.

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Trump and the Russians or Obama and the Russians!?

...maybe this will backfire on them too, depending on how long this suit goes on. The longer it goes the more 'discovery' there will be. Heck, a 'countersuit' could even come of this. :)

Per Rush, Bernie is the one that has a legitimate lawsuit here, against his own party.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
DNC Files Frivolous Campaign Lawsuit, Trump Campaign Responds: We Look Forward To Discovery…

"In a pathetic attempt to keep pushing the vast Russian conspiracy narrative; and trying to get out in front of growing evidence that former Obama administration, government officials, DNC and weaponized government conspired to assist Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential bid; the DNC has filed a lawsuit against the Trump campaign accusing their opposition of what they are transparently guilty of....."

"...It’s actually a predictable strategy given the nature of the current pendulum swing and the increased likelihood multiple political operatives are about to find themselves in the investigative spotlight. By driving the political divisive narrative harder, the Democrats will attempt to say any criminal investigative findings are political.

The DNC lawsuit will most likely be dismissed as frivolous. However, in the event it is allowed the proceed the Trump campaign can stand to gain a great deal of information during the discovery phase. The Trump team respond:

[…] If this lawsuit proceeds, the Trump Campaign will be prepared to leverage the discovery process and explore the DNC’s now-secret records about the actual corruption they perpetrated to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Everything will be on the table, including:

♦How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.
♦Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.
♦How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.
♦How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.
♦Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more. (link)...."
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
DNC Files Frivolous Campaign Lawsuit, Trump Campaign Responds: We Look Forward To Discovery…

♦How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.
♦Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.
♦How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.
♦How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.
♦Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more. (link)...."

what goes around... :Roflmao
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It took a fairly long time to get to the bottom of Watergate too but eventually the truth will come out as it will in Trunp's case. He will be impeached or resign.

Senate Watergate hearings and revelation of the Watergate tapes

On February 7, 1973, the United States Senate voted 77-to-0 to approve Senate Resolution S.Res. 60 and establish a select committee to investigate Watergate, with Sam Ervin named chairman the next day.

Resignation
"Resignation of Richard Nixon" redirects here. For the nationally televised address from the Oval Office, see Richard Nixon's resignation speech.
Further information: Inauguration of Gerald Ford
The release of the “smoking gun” tape destroyed Nixon politically. The ten congressmen who had voted against all three articles of impeachment in the House Judiciary Committee announced they would all support the impeachment article accusing Nixon of obstructing justice when the articles came up before the full House.[71]

On the night of August 7, 1974, Senators Barry Goldwater and Hugh Scott and Congressman John Jacob Rhodes met with Nixon in the Oval Office. Scott and Rhodes were the Republican leaders in the Senate and House, respectively; Goldwater was brought along as an elder statesman. The three lawmakers told Nixon that his support in Congress had all but disappeared. Rhodes told Nixon that he would face certain impeachment when the articles came up for vote in the full House. Goldwater and Scott told the president that there were enough votes in the Senate to convict him, and that no more than 15 Senators were willing to vote for acquittal.

Realizing that he had no chance of staying in office and that public opinion was not in his favor, Nixon decided to resign. [72] In a nationally televised address from the Oval Office on the evening of August 8, 1974, the president said, in part:

In all the decisions I have made in my public life, I have always tried to do what was best for the Nation. Throughout the long and difficult period of Watergate, I have felt it was my duty to persevere, to make every possible effort to complete the term of office to which you elected me. In the past few days, however, it has become evident to me that I no longer have a strong enough political base in the Congress to justify continuing that effort. As long as there was such a base, I felt strongly that it was necessary to see the constitutional process through to its conclusion, that to do otherwise would be unfaithful to the spirit of that deliberately difficult process and a dangerously destabilizing precedent for the future….

I would have preferred to carry through to the finish whatever the personal agony it would have involved, and my family unanimously urged me to do so. But the interest of the Nation must always come before any personal considerations. From the discussions I have had with Congressional and other leaders, I have concluded that because of the Watergate matter I might not have the support of the Congress that I would consider necessary to back the very difficult decisions and carry out the duties of this office in the way the interests of the Nation would require.

I have never been a quitter. To leave office before my term is completed is abhorrent to every instinct in my body. But as President, I must put the interest of America first. America needs a full-time President and a full-time Congress, particularly at this time with problems we face at home and abroad. To continue to fight through the months ahead for my personal vindication would almost totally absorb the time and attention of both the President and the Congress in a period when our entire focus should be on the great issues of peace abroad and prosperity without inflation at home. Therefore, I shall resign the Presidency effective at noon tomorrow. Vice President Ford will be sworn in as President at that hour in this office.[73]
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Per Rush, Bernie is the one that has a legitimate lawsuit here, against his own party.

Might be true if Bernie were a member of the party, but he isn't. He's an independent and all the caterwauling he indulged in about being unfairly treated falls flat when you consider that the Democratic National Committee might just prefer a Democrat to have the nomination.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Might be true if Bernie were a member of the party, but he isn't. He's an independent and all the caterwauling he indulged in about being unfairly treated falls flat when you consider that the Democratic National Committee might just prefer a Democrat to have the nomination.

Then they should say so. But they didn't and they won't.

They were trying to have their cake and eat it too, by avoiding a third party candidate.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Might be true if Bernie were a member of the party, but he isn't.

I stand corrected, I knew that and forgot. Rush didn't refer to the DNC as Bernie's party, that was my mistake. Regardless, he could possibly have a legitimate suit against the DNC.

Have a nice evening.

[add]

...little difference; they're all socialists....
 
Last edited:

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Might be true if Bernie were a member of the party, but he isn't. He's an independent and all the caterwauling he indulged in about being unfairly treated falls flat when you consider that the Democratic National Committee might just prefer a Democrat to have the nomination.
That is an interesting point. Thank you.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It took a fairly long time to get to the bottom of Watergate too but eventually the truth will come out as it will in Trunp's case. He will be impeached or resign.
Wishful thinking.

Someone will probably go to jail - but not Trump.

Time will tell.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A ridiculous and discriminatory statement.

Totally agree!
Dems are really smart in the sense of knowing how to manipulate facts, evidence, opinions etc. to achieve their ends, but are extremely shortsighted and fail to consider the REAL result of their shenanigans.
IOW, they are pitifully short on COMMON SENSE.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Totally agree!
Dems are really smart in the sense of knowing how to manipulate facts, evidence, opinions etc. to achieve their ends, but are extremely shortsighted and fail to consider the REAL result of their shenanigans.
IOW, they are pitifully short on COMMON SENSE.
Proof? Of course not.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Allowing Iran 1.7 billion to build up their nuclear stockpile.
What has Trump done about Iran or any other country except tweet random thoughts which increase the terrorist danger in the world. GW Bush and Cheney did the most significant thing to support Iran. They destroyed the military of their natural enemy, Iraq. Iran certainly loved them for doing that.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What has Trump done about Iran or any other country except tweet random thoughts which increase the terrorist danger in the world. GW Bush and Cheney did the most significant thing to support Iran. They destroyed the military of their natural enemy, Iraq. Iran certainly loved them for doing that.
He is working on the denuking of NOKO.

It seems some sectors hate Trump more than a desire for world peace.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
He is working on the denuking of NOKO.

It seems some sectors hate Trump more than a desire for world peace.
He almost got us involved in a nuclear war through his brash and irresponsible remarks. I don't call that working for world peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top