1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Indefinite Dictatorial Power

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by KenH, Dec 22, 2005.

  1. Baptist in Richmond

    Baptist in Richmond Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    5,123
    Likes Received:
    19
    Please provide an example of what you claim....
     
  2. Baptist in Richmond

    Baptist in Richmond Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    5,123
    Likes Received:
    19
    Fair enough: you answered my honest question.

    Exactly what was the reason for this seemingly caustic response? What exactly does this add to what you posted above? It certainly doesn't reinforce anything you mentioned.

    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year,
    BiR
     
  3. Bunyon

    Bunyon New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    It serves two purposes. It shows that I would be consistent with democrat or republican who acted like this. And it highlights my contention that most of the folks who are so worried about this Bush situation were apologist for Clinton and would not be and are not consistent. They are mostly political when it comes to Bush. I bet they would not care if it were Clinton. Bush is acting in our best interest and has been completely honest. Clinton was as dishonest, manipulative, self serving as a president ever was. But I feel confident most of those now attacking Bush, not so zealous over Clinton's selfish dishonesty's. However, in contrast, I would be acting just the same if it were Clinton.
     
  4. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ken, why the insistence on treating the threat of terrorist attack as a law enforcement issue and not a matter of national defense? We're talking about combatting a non-national organization and preventing attacks on our country, not a street thug about to knock over a convenience store. This is an enemy who has made war against the United States. They didn't simply blow up a car on a street, they killed thousands of Americans in a coordinated attack.
     
  5. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,066
    Likes Received:
    1,650
    Faith:
    Baptist
    All I am asking is for the executive branch to follow the law. If it has been, fine. If it hasn't, then it needs to be called on the carpet for it.
     
  6. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand and appreciate your point but: (1) I don't think it's clear that he has broken the law (as indicated in OR's post on the last page) and (2) I'm willing to cut the guy some slack when it comes to defending the country from attack.
     
  7. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    43,066
    Likes Received:
    1,650
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We'll let Congress sort it out when it comes back into session in 2006. [​IMG]
     
  8. fromtheright

    fromtheright <img src =/2844.JPG>

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,772
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've got a question I'm about to post in another thread that I look forward to your answer on.
     
  9. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I believe it is a constitutional issue and Congress has no authority to "sort it out" except by the power of the purse. A risky proposition.
     
  10. NiteShift

    NiteShift New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Two points worth noting:
    1. I asked an honest question, and did not make any observation that you mention above.
    2. You didn't answer my question, despite the fact that I did not make any observation that you mention above.

    Regards anyway - hope you had a Merry Christmas,
    BiR
    </font>[/QUOTE]BiR, you asked a question and I honestly answered it. You asked what it would take for those of us who support President Bush to be critical of him. I answered that with so many outrageous accusations being thrown at him, we feel compelled to defend him. I didn't say that you called Bush a facist or a phoney Christian, only that those are things he has been called on this board. And I hope you had a Merry Christmas also
     
Loading...