• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

India charges WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminath for Mass Murder for misinformation on ivermectin

R

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
nd Report: India charges WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminathan: India is a forefront nation in demanding accountability from the WHO, the Indian Bar Association (IBA) now suing WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan.

They are accusing her of causing the deaths of many Indian citizens by misleading them about the effect of Ivermectin, which she stated did not work against Covid-19.

As a result, the use of Ivermectin to cure Covid-19 was stopped and Covid cases exploded with deaths increasing ten-fold.

Point 56 states: “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. (Feature photo: WHO Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)

Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

[URL="https://hannenabintuherland.com/asia/india-charges-who-scientist-soumya-swaminathan-for-mass-murder-the-beginning-of-accountability/"]India charges WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminathan for Mass Murder: The beginning of Accountability - The Herland Report[/URL]
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/20...nsibility-of-its-emergency-use-authorization/
 
Reynolds

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Revmitchell said:
nd Report: India charges WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminathan: India is a forefront nation in demanding accountability from the WHO, the Indian Bar Association (IBA) now suing WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan.

They are accusing her of causing the deaths of many Indian citizens by misleading them about the effect of Ivermectin, which she stated did not work against Covid-19.

As a result, the use of Ivermectin to cure Covid-19 was stopped and Covid cases exploded with deaths increasing ten-fold.

Point 56 states: “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. (Feature photo: WHO Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan)

Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

India charges WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminathan for Mass Murder: The beginning of Accountability - The Herland Report
Click to expand...
I can tell you that Ivermectin works.
 
JonC

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
The problem with ivermectin for covid is the dosage.

Some have determined it is an effective treatment for covid at 600 mg for 5 consecutive days.

But the approved dosage for ivermectin is 150 to 200 mg every 3 to 6 months.

Ivermectin has been proven deadly in amounts beyond the recommended dose (ivermectin recipients are taking over 50x the approved dose).

So it goes back to drinking bleach...the cure is mo good if it is worse than the disease.
 
Reynolds

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Scott Downey said:
Like that you have had personal experience, took Ivermectin, and nothing bad happened to you like Rachel Madcow was saying people are going blind and in the ICU overdosed on Ivermectin horse dewormer.
Click to expand...
You are just full of propaganda. Ivermectin was created for Humans and is used on Humans and Animals. Calling Ivermectin horse dewormer is as rediuculous as calling Augmentin horse antibiotics or calling azithromycin dog antibiotics.
My Ivermectin came from the same pharmacy all the rest of my prescriptions come from.

(Rev said I am missing some sarcasm or something. Sorry if I am)
 
Last edited:
JonC

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Reynolds said:
You are just full of propaganda. Ivermectin was created for Humans and is used on Humans and Animals. Calling Ivermectin horse dewormer is as rediuculous as calling Augmentin horse antibiotics or calling azithromycin dog antibiotics.
My Ivermectin came from the same pharmacy all the rest of my prescriptions come from.

You are simply dishonest.
Click to expand...
I have wondered why people have focused on ivermectin as a medicine for animals. It is, but it also has human applications (as does benadryl).
 
R

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reynolds said:
You are just full of propaganda. Ivermectin was created for Humans and is used on Humans and Animals. Calling Ivermectin horse dewormer is as rediuculous as calling Augmentin horse antibiotics or calling azithromycin dog antibiotics.
My Ivermectin came from the same pharmacy all the rest of my prescriptions come from.

You are simply dishonest.
Click to expand...

umm you do understand he was repeating what Maddow said…. Correct?
 
S

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Reynolds said:
You are just full of propaganda. Ivermectin was created for Humans and is used on Humans and Animals. Calling Ivermectin horse dewormer is as rediuculous as calling Augmentin horse antibiotics or calling azithromycin dog antibiotics.
My Ivermectin came from the same pharmacy all the rest of my prescriptions come from.

(Rev said I am missing some sarcasm or something. Sorry if I am)
Click to expand...
I am in favor of Ivermectin use, not opposed! The people who are opposed make Ivermectin out to be horse dewormer and people are not horses, is my point.
 
S

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Anyone who questions my support of Ivermectin, is not paying attention to some of the threads I have started here over many months of time, even going back to mid 2020 when it was first positively mentioned along with hydroxychloroquine. I dont think I ever said a negative word about it.

The med establishment only wants vaccines, Ivermectin does not make for them the big bucks. they are perfectly ok with letting you die in a hospital than give you ivermectin. People have had to go to court to force them into giving ivermectin to dying people. And after your far advanced with this illness and put on that respirator it is often just too late.
 
JonC

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Scott Downey said:
Anyone who questions my support of Ivermectin, is not paying attention to some of the threads I have started here over many months of time, even going back to mid 2020 when it was first positively mentioned along with hydroxychloroquine. I dont think I ever said a negative word about it.

The med establishment only wants vaccines, Ivermectin does not make for them the big bucks. they are perfectly ok with letting you die in a hospital than give you ivermectin. People have had to go to court to force them into giving ivermectin to dying people. And after your far advanced with this illness and put on that respirator it is often just too late.
Click to expand...
I think the problem with ivermectin is medical facilities fear of malpractice lawsuits.

I get giving it for covid patients, but the dose they are saying is effective for seriously ill covid patients is an overdose (50x the dose the drug is approved for in humans). And there have been side-effects of using ivermectin at that level (blindness, death).

If the FDA would approve the treatment (even if only for emergency use) perhaps doctors would be more apt to use it.
 
R

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The problem with Ivermectin is the powers that be have no legitimate reason to be against it they just want to push the vaccine. Hence the mistrust of many.

The problems and long term effects with Ivermectin are well known. That cannot be said about the covid vaccine.
 
Reynolds

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Revmitchell said:
The problem with Ivermectin is the powers that be have no legitimate reason to be against it they just want to push the vaccine. Hence the mistrust of many.

The problems and long term effects with Ivermectin are well known. That cannot be said about the covid vaccine.
Click to expand...
And Ivermectin is cheap.
 
S

Scott Downey

Well-Known Member
Reynolds said:
The NIH is neutral on Ivomec. Why the media hate for it?
Ivermectin | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines
Click to expand...
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines (nih.gov)
Notice what they are saying here.

Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Still Fauci claims Ivermectin is dangerous, and the AMA refuses to allow its membership to prescribe Ivermectin for Covid.
The only logical conclusion I can reach is, they would prefer you to die of covid rather than have ivermectin treatment. They want everyone to get the covid vaccine. those who are sick and dying are out of luck, will only get palliative care on a respirator until their compassionate medically overdosed death.

Midazolam is what they inject the covid patients with on respirators

Midazolam is a commonly used benzodiazepine in palliative care and is considered one of the four essential drugs needed for the promotion of quality care in dying patients. Acting on the benzodiazepine receptor, it promotes the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top