Maybe they will capture, try, and execute her.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
India charges WHO Scientist Soumya Swaminath for Mass Murder for misinformation on ivermectin
- Thread starter Revmitchell
- Start date
Scott Downey
Well-Known Member
"Tamil Nadu publicly relied upon Dr. Swaminathan's advice in revoking their initial choice of Ivermectin the day after she recommended against it in her May 10 tweet on social media. As a direct result, Tamil Nadu experienced a surge in COVID death and sickness that continues to this day."
See the power of Dr. Fauci and the US medical industrial complex is at work behind this demonizing of Ivermectin.
Why would they on one tweet, discontinue an Ivermectin policy they had just favored and approved?
Do they have no brains of their own?
African countries that regularly use Ivermectin to PREVENT parasitical diseases. as in the people take it regularly have low covid deaths. Whereas the other African countries that did not regularly use Ivermectin, (no need to ), had high covid deaths...
the evidence is also showing common ACE inhibitor drugs people take, lower covid infections, posted on that a month ago. I for one take Lisinopril 40mg every day, which is supposedly a covid disease suppressor, it helps to keep the virus from infecting the cells.
See the power of Dr. Fauci and the US medical industrial complex is at work behind this demonizing of Ivermectin.
Why would they on one tweet, discontinue an Ivermectin policy they had just favored and approved?
Do they have no brains of their own?
African countries that regularly use Ivermectin to PREVENT parasitical diseases. as in the people take it regularly have low covid deaths. Whereas the other African countries that did not regularly use Ivermectin, (no need to ), had high covid deaths...
the evidence is also showing common ACE inhibitor drugs people take, lower covid infections, posted on that a month ago. I for one take Lisinopril 40mg every day, which is supposedly a covid disease suppressor, it helps to keep the virus from infecting the cells.
Last edited:
Scott Downey
Well-Known Member
The pivotal link between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection (nih.gov)
Example
In the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, ACE2 receptors can be considered ‘devils’, being the ‘entry door’ for the virus. Evidence about this phenomenon is now strong and convincing. Hoffmann et al [2] and Walls et al [3] provided unequivocal evidence that SARS-CoV-2 gain access to cells through ACE2 receptors, as it happened with SARS-Cov.
Lisinopril: Uses, Dosage, Side Effects & Warnings - Drugs.com
What is lisinopril?
Lisinopril is an ACE inhibitor. ACE stands for angiotensin converting enzyme.
Lisinopril is used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension) in adults and children who are at least 6 years old.
What is the ACE2 receptor? (asbmb.org)
How is it connected to coronavirus and why might it be key to treating COVID-19? The experts explain
Evidence for a protective effect of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with COVID-19 was shown in recent work co-authored by one of us - Dr. Loomba.
Example
In the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, ACE2 receptors can be considered ‘devils’, being the ‘entry door’ for the virus. Evidence about this phenomenon is now strong and convincing. Hoffmann et al [2] and Walls et al [3] provided unequivocal evidence that SARS-CoV-2 gain access to cells through ACE2 receptors, as it happened with SARS-Cov.
Lisinopril: Uses, Dosage, Side Effects & Warnings - Drugs.com
What is lisinopril?
Lisinopril is an ACE inhibitor. ACE stands for angiotensin converting enzyme.
Lisinopril is used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension) in adults and children who are at least 6 years old.
What is the ACE2 receptor? (asbmb.org)
How is it connected to coronavirus and why might it be key to treating COVID-19? The experts explain
Evidence for a protective effect of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with COVID-19 was shown in recent work co-authored by one of us - Dr. Loomba.
Last edited:
I used to take it. It made me cough like I had bronchitis. I went around two weeks barking like a dog.
border collie or chihuahua ?
Blue tick hound.
In June, VAERS reported 6,985 deaths due to the COVID vaccines.
Then it jumped to 11,405 in July.
And now it is at 14,701 reported deaths.
That is a jump of 3,296 since July 24th.
Scott Downey
Well-Known Member
I take it at 40mg and wife takes 10mg, and we dont get that cough. Neither of us ever get sick, both covid negative.
Scott Downey
Well-Known Member
The negative posters on this board claim this drug to be toxic and dangerous at higher doses, you know who they are. They are Fauci's parrots.
Merck’s deadly Vioxx playbook, redux: a debunked smear campaign against its competing drug—the FDA-approved, Nobel prize-honored ivermectin (trialsitenews.com)
On the science behind ivermectin and COVID-19, including clinical, animal, and molecular studies, see this recently published review.18 Its lead author is a prominent clinical researcher at Yale. Two coauthors are in the line of the only two Nobel prize-honored treatment breakthroughs for infectious diseases since the one for streptomycin in 1952. Notably, coauthor Thomas Borody in 1990 published the first clinical trial for the cure for H. pylori (peptic ulcers).31 That cure consisted of three repurposed inexpensive drugs: two antibiotics and bismuth.18 It was adopted immediately in Australia, in 1990, saving an estimated 18,000 lives.32 A decade later, after the patents for the billion dollar palliative drugs, Tagamet and Zantac, expired, that cure became the standard of care for peptic ulcers in the rest of the world.18
Ivermectin safety. Ivermectin is well tolerated even at ten times the standard dose of 200 μg/kg,33,34 and at high doses, in particular, for COVID-19 treatment.35,36 Cancer patients who took ivermectin at five times that standard dose daily for up to 180 consecutive days had no serious adverse effects from it, in experimental protocols with harsh additional drugs.37 Of 19 patients who took extreme overdoses up to 1,000-fold that standard dose of either ivermectin or the closely related abamectin, all using veterinary forms, only one 72-year-old male who took 440 times the standard dose died.
Merck’s deadly Vioxx playbook, redux: a debunked smear campaign against its competing drug—the FDA-approved, Nobel prize-honored ivermectin (trialsitenews.com)
On the science behind ivermectin and COVID-19, including clinical, animal, and molecular studies, see this recently published review.18 Its lead author is a prominent clinical researcher at Yale. Two coauthors are in the line of the only two Nobel prize-honored treatment breakthroughs for infectious diseases since the one for streptomycin in 1952. Notably, coauthor Thomas Borody in 1990 published the first clinical trial for the cure for H. pylori (peptic ulcers).31 That cure consisted of three repurposed inexpensive drugs: two antibiotics and bismuth.18 It was adopted immediately in Australia, in 1990, saving an estimated 18,000 lives.32 A decade later, after the patents for the billion dollar palliative drugs, Tagamet and Zantac, expired, that cure became the standard of care for peptic ulcers in the rest of the world.18
Ivermectin safety. Ivermectin is well tolerated even at ten times the standard dose of 200 μg/kg,33,34 and at high doses, in particular, for COVID-19 treatment.35,36 Cancer patients who took ivermectin at five times that standard dose daily for up to 180 consecutive days had no serious adverse effects from it, in experimental protocols with harsh additional drugs.37 Of 19 patients who took extreme overdoses up to 1,000-fold that standard dose of either ivermectin or the closely related abamectin, all using veterinary forms, only one 72-year-old male who took 440 times the standard dose died.
Scott Downey
Well-Known Member
Here is an Australian man making a major accusation again medical treatment of vaxxed versus the non vaxxed in hospitals over there.
He says they use Ivermectin to save lives of the hospitalized vaxxed, but dont give Ivermectin to the hospitalized non vaxxed, simply put them on the ventilators to die, as an attempt to cover up the poor results of the vaccine, and further scare the public into getting vaxxed
You can see in the video he is really upset.
Of interest to me is how worldwide the powers that be have inflamed people all over the world with how they are treating the covid pandemic.
Whether his story is true or not, what cant be denied is what they have done, which in my estimation is they have done many evil things regarding covid.
Brighteon
He says they use Ivermectin to save lives of the hospitalized vaxxed, but dont give Ivermectin to the hospitalized non vaxxed, simply put them on the ventilators to die, as an attempt to cover up the poor results of the vaccine, and further scare the public into getting vaxxed
You can see in the video he is really upset.
Of interest to me is how worldwide the powers that be have inflamed people all over the world with how they are treating the covid pandemic.
Whether his story is true or not, what cant be denied is what they have done, which in my estimation is they have done many evil things regarding covid.
Brighteon
Glad you can take it. A lot of people can. Some can't.
We've had collies and blue tick hounds (as well as golden retriever and black & tan hounds) -- but I've never figured out what a chihuahua is good for. They're as cranky as the average Baptist Board member!
We've had collies and blue tick hounds (as well as golden retriever and black & tan hounds) -- but I've never figured out what a chihuahua is good for. They're as cranky as the average Baptist Board member!
bait
Uh....no.....that was from the pharmaceutical company that makes the drug (from the ones that would profit from its use....i.e., Merch).
From merch.com :
- No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
- No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
- A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.