Insurance companies sound the alarm

[Two Wings]

I've provided the video containing the segment quoted in the beginning of this thread. The insurance company CEO is voicing a real concern that the unexpectedly large recent death rate of people aged 18-64 isn't consistent with the covid deaths that have been reported. He and others argue that the low rate of vaccinations in Indiana needs to be increased because that is the only thing that has been demonstrated to effectively lower deaths from this virus. What evidence do you have that they were "way over reported in 3Q20"? You just made that up and went on and on based on an unproven and untrue statement.

wow. really? I wasn't around here in Sept '20 .... so maybe y'all were quarantined from everything ... but the CDC reported 94% of the attributed deaths to covid was an error. 94% ... not 9.4% ... not 19.4% ... ninety-four percent. As in the overwhelmingly VAST majority of the attributions at the time (Aug or Sept '20) were excessive ... and THAT despite the also at the time, highest numbers from the NY/NJ nursing homes where those poor people were subjected to this virus by POLICY. It was last spring '21 before the non-elderly non NY/NJ nursing home numbers exceeded those two places as the "#1 spot" demographic.

You provided it ... and I watched the referenced segment.

I'm also telling you that Indiana isn't exclusive in this 40% increase number. It's happened here in Texas, too. and these non-covid death explosion cannot be attributed to delayed procedures, not all of 'em ... not enough there to make the 40% number.

If you wanna disregard anything contrary to your narrative on covid, that's your business ... but you're dancing with the devil by the pale moonlight.

The insurance CEO didn't say it ... nor would he ... he clearly is pushing the cv jab ... but the single biggest difference in public health from 3Q20 and 3Q21 (the 40% increase quarter) ... is the mass deployment of the cv jab. Just lost another high profile person in Bob Saget. perhaps the cv jab was irrelevant ... or perhaps it was the direct cause. Sudden death IS A FACTOR.

Anyhow. I expect you'll have pithy remarks to ridicule me in what I've written here.

The truth marches on, FTW. One of these days all will recognize how we responded to covid19 was just about the worst possible solution ... to include the mass cv jab during the pandemic.

 

[FollowTheWay]

wow. really? I wasn't around here in Sept '20 .... so maybe y'all were quarantined from everything ... but the CDC reported 94% of the attributed deaths to covid was an error. 94% ... not 9.4% ... not 19.4% ... ninety-four percent. As in the overwhelmingly VAST majority of the attributions at the time (Aug or Sept '20) were excessive ... and THAT despite the also at the time, highest numbers from the NY/NJ nursing homes where those poor people were subjected to this virus by POLICY. It was last spring '21 before the non-elderly non NY/NJ nursing home numbers exceeded those two places as the "#1 spot" demographic.

You provided it ... and I watched the referenced segment.

I'm also telling you that Indiana isn't exclusive in this 40% increase number. It's happened here in Texas, too. and these non-covid death explosion cannot be attributed to delayed procedures, not all of 'em ... not enough there to make the 40% number.

If you wanna disregard anything contrary to your narrative on covid, that's your business ... but you're dancing with the devil by the pale moonlight.

The insurance CEO didn't say it ... nor would he ... he clearly is pushing the cv jab ... but the single biggest difference in public health from 3Q20 and 3Q21 (the 40% increase quarter) ... is the mass deployment of the cv jab. Just lost another high profile person in Bob Saget. perhaps the cv jab was irrelevant ... or perhaps it was the direct cause. Sudden death IS A FACTOR.

Anyhow. I expect you'll have pithy remarks to ridicule me in what I've written here.

The truth marches on, FTW. One of these days all will recognize how we responded to covid19 was just about the worst possible solution ... to include the mass cv jab during the pandemic.

Please provide a CDC link upholding your statement.

 

[Two Wings]

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/health_policy/covid19-comorbidity-expanded-12092020-508.pdf

the text is right off the bat ... 6% of the reported deaths had only covid-19 as the cause. 94% had multiple comorbidiies.

So, the argumentation is gonna allow disregard of what's being listed here ... OK ... fine. But why, then, does that same argument fail to even allow for the question "now" (now's reference anyway) of 3Q21 ... what changed to cause a whopping 40% increase in non covid-related deaths.

the only idea is that covid deaths were under reported for 3Q21? That'd be almost as much underreporting in 3Q21 as over reported in 3Q20.

that's some bad statting. And we're supposed to accept policy based on such erratic data as this?

 

[FollowTheWay]

Let me make it crystal clear so you might be able to understand. The majority of deaths from Covid are people 65 and older. Right? People in nursing homes usually have
physical challenges e.g. kidney problems, heart problems, problems with breathing (emphysema, etc.). Right? Suppose a major Covid outbreak occurs in a nursing home
and a large number of people die. They die from Covid but still have those pre-existing conditions which likely made Covid more dangerous for them. You claim that those
people did not die from Covid because yhey had per-existing conditions (comorbidities).

Do you now understand how ridiculous your argument is?