Daisy,
Thank you for your response and thank you for doing it with thoughtfulness rather than some of the personal attacks that some like to make against each other on this site.
I can only give you my perspective related to some of your comments:
What is the purpose of this conflict?
Haven't we already won? There are no WMDs, no nuclear programme, Saddam is overthrown, tried and hanged, his sons are dead and we brought democracy to Iraq (and we got the oil contracts in petrodollars, not petroeuros).
What is left to do? I don't think it is feasible to try to establish a permanent military base there any longer, do you? While it would've been nice to move troops out of Saudi Arabia and the Islamic holy lands and into Iraq that was never a stated goal, so perhaps we could forgo it.
The purpose of this conflict is not only to deny Al Queda a foothold in Iraq, but to destroy Al Queda whereever it might be found. If children can be raised without hate toward America... then we have a chance to succeed. We must give every effort to support our Iraqi brothers in this conflict. They have recieved much training from us, but we can't just leave them. It's as if they are a young tree with fresh roots, if we leave too soon, the wind will simply blow them away.
Even though Iraq was not involved in 9/11, we know that Al Queda did have contact with the Iraqi government. Not sure what the total extend was, but there was contact according to the 9/11 Commission Report. We know Al Queda is in Iraq now and active in the defeat of both the US and Iraq.
If we(US & Iraq) lose... Al Queda gets a new place to operate from. The war on terror has worked well in reducing the places they can go and also is making it more difficult to finance Al Queda.
Iraq is just one battleground in the War against terrorism. We have to be more patient than our enemies or we will lose this war. Americans have never been known for much patience.
Originally Posted by r
When our enemies smell fear and doubt... they see hope.
I haven't been there, but I suspect the smell of fear and doubt (and perhaps despair) is far, far stronger there than here.
I think you could be right about that and I think I know why. The last time we were in Iraq, back in 91, we made promises to some Iraqi's that we would back them up. Well... we left them and they faced Saddam and many of those people were killed. We cut and run.
Soon they will hear of a resolution from our congress basically saying... we are gonna cut and run. Put yourself in their place and maybe you would be hesitant to step up in a big fight if you knew that the person watching your back had backed out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by r
When our enemies see us more interested in attacking our president, than attacking our enemies... they see opportunity.
That's a bit strong - no one has attacked our president with cluster bombs, white phosphorous, sticks or stones. A few tough questions are not exactly the same as an attack.
Daisy, it's more than just questions. He's been called a liar, a murderer and much worse. It's personal, it's hateful. It's more than just disagreement on the part of many people.
The worse part is that it gives our enemies hope. Hope of succeeding. Hope of overcoming the US. Wasn't it Lincoln who said, a divided house cannot stand. That's where we are today.
I am afraid if the US is seen as weak to our enemies, it will embolden them to attack us some and repeatedly. Stepping out of Iraq just might make things even worse. I guess we will wait and pray and see.