Is BLM a Hate Group Comparable to the KKK?

[Benjamin]

So...how is this like the KKK? It seems you start with your own prejudice and then project it upon protestors.

Apparently, "it seems" you are attempting to put a defense argument for the actions of the BLM through the fallacy of semantic ambiguity over the definition of the KKK, however the comparison of racially motivated violence remains a valid argument.

...you start with your own prejudice...

I know today most Liberals believe they can get a pass throwing around such accusations, maybe I'm old school on this but, in person I would be in the face and down the throat of someone who accused me of being racially prejudice as I take that lying accusation to be very offensive.

The BLM movement is about promoting Marxism as a means of equality, not racism as a means of oppression.

The BLM is about politics pushing a false narrative and opportunists acting out and looting/stealing, and mugging by those who have no respect for law and order under the false claims of racism in order to cause division in our country for the purposes of driving Socialism and Marxism while they violate the rights of the 1st amendment having become racially motivated violent thugs. If it had ANYTHING to do with "equality" concerning the behavior of the police then addressing the behavior of children and teaching them (it is the children that need to be reeducated more the then police) to obey the law would factor in more than color, therein is the true issue. IF IT WERE TRULY about black lives then the fight would NOT be against the police but against the many other causes of black deaths which far far FAR outweigh police brutality!

 

[church mouse guy]

They are groups working to take down capitalism. They are not groups based on racism like the KKK or other white supremacist groups. You are thcomparing apples to oranges.

Oh, well, that explains why white people are being murdered by BLM.

 

[church mouse guy]

Democrats love only money:

 

[Eric B]

If it had ANYTHING to do with "equality" concerning the behavior of the police then addressing the behavior of children and teaching them (it is the children that need to be reeducated more the then police) to obey the law would factor in more than color, therein is the true issue. IF IT WERE TRULY about black lives then the fight would NOT be against the police but against the many other causes of black deaths which far far FAR outweigh police brutality!

All blacks getting killed by the police are not breaking the Law. This sort of assumption is precisely the problem.

 

[church mouse guy]

All blacks getting killed by the police are not breaking the Law. This sort of assumption is precisely the problem.

Of course, the death of one innocent black person is one too many and a tragedy beyond all doubt but I wonder if you have the crime statistics on that because I don't?

 

[Sai]

Blm is what emboldened black supremacy looks like.


Joy unspeakable full of glory

 

[Sai]

All blacks getting killed by the police are not breaking the Law. This sort of assumption is precisely the problem.

The problem is not in America. It is in other countries that black lives are in turmoil. The reason for the appropriation of black servitude is because of illiteracy. The problem remains true in Africa where if corrected the people could very well enter into a better life. But that will not happen prior to the kingdom.


Joy unspeakable full of glory

 

[Benjamin]

All blacks getting killed by the police are not breaking the Law. This sort of assumption is precisely the problem.

Your Strawman does not address any issue of my argument.

 

[AustinC]

Apparently, "it seems" you are attempting to put a defense argument for the actions of the BLM through the fallacy of semantic ambiguity over the definition of the KKK, however the comparison of racially motivated violence remains a valid argument.

I know today most Liberals believe they can get a pass throwing around such accusations, maybe I'm old school on this but, in person I would be in the face and down the throat of someone who accused me of being racially prejudice as I take that lying accusation to be very offensive.



The BLM is about politics pushing a false narrative and opportunists acting out and looting/stealing, and mugging by those who have no respect for law and order under the false claims of racism in order to cause division in our country for the purposes of driving Socialism and Marxism while they violate the rights of the 1st amendment having become racially motivated violent thugs. If it had ANYTHING to do with "equality" concerning the behavior of the police then addressing the behavior of children and teaching them (it is the children that need to be reeducated more the then police) to obey the law would factor in more than color, therein is the true issue. IF IT WERE TRULY about black lives then the fight would NOT be against the police but against the many other causes of black deaths which far far FAR outweigh police brutality!

Which is why it's not a racist organization and cannot be directly compared to the KKK.
It is just as evil as the KKK, but it's not racist. It's ideology is based in dialectic materialism (Marxism).

 

[church mouse guy]

Which is why it's not a racist organization and cannot be directly compared to the KKK.
It is just as evil as the KKK, but it's not racist. It's ideology is based in dialectic materialism (Marxism).

Marxism was always racist. More and more rich white kids with woke privilege populate the ranks of BLM. BLM is also tied up with militant lesbianism and anti- family elements per their founders.

One of the leading communist racists today is Xi Jinping who hates black Africans openly.

 

[AustinC]

Marxism was always racist. More and more rich white kids with woke privilege populate the ranks of BLM. BLM is also tied up with militant lesbianism and anti- family elements per their founders.

One of the leading communist racists today is Xi Jinping who hates black Africans openly.

Your first statement is wrong and provably wrong.
Simply check out all the Marxist nation's that are filled with multiple ethnic groups all promoting a failed economic system.
No, Marxism (dialectic materialism) is not racist. It is entirely flawed as an ideology because it fails to recognize that all humans are, by nature, self-centered and driven by self-interest.

 

[church mouse guy]

Your first statement is wrong and provably wrong.
Simply check out all the Marxist nation's that are filled with multiple ethnic groups all promoting a failed economic system.
No, Marxism (dialectic materialism) is not racist. It is entirely flawed as an ideology because it fails to recognize that all humans are, by nature, self-centered and driven by self-interest.

Karl Marx himself was a Jew but he hated Jews. Many American blacks went to the Soviet Union and then found out that they had made a mistake but were not allowed by Stalin to go home. Fidel Castro hated blacks and there are only token blacks in his government and not at the top levels. Che also hated blacks and said that they smelled bad, etc.

 

[AustinC]

Karl Marx himself was a Jew but he hated Jews. Many American blacks went to the Soviet Union and then found out that they had made a mistake but were not allowed by Stalin to go home. Fidel Castro hated blacks and there are only token blacks in his government and not at the top levels. Che also hated blacks and said that they smelled bad, etc.

You are now trying to take individual prejudice and claim that an economic theory and ideology is a racist ideology. It's time you just admit you are attempting to compare an apple to an orange.

 

[church mouse guy]

You are now trying to take individual prejudice and claim that an economic theory and ideology is a racist ideology. It's time you just admit you are attempting to compare an apple to an orange.

No, I am trying to say that Marx, Stalin, Che, Fidel Castro, Xi Jinping and the overweight black lesbians who started BLM, for examples, were all intolerant psychopath communists. So yes, BLM is racist because it just a black KKK.

Remember that on August 23, 1939, Stalin made a non-aggression pact with Hitler so communists and nazis do get along.

 

[AustinC]

No, I am trying to say that Marx, Stalin, Che, Fidel Castro, Xi Jinping and the overweight black lesbians who started BLM, for examples, were all intolerant psychopath communists. So yes, BLM is racist because it just a black KKK.

Remember that on August 23, 1939, Stalin made a non-aggression pact with Hitler so communists and nazis do get along.

It is not "just a black KKK" and this has been repeatedly demonstrated to you. You are trying to compare an apple to a cucumber.

 

[church mouse guy]

It is not "just a black KKK" and this has been repeatedly demonstrated to you. You are trying to compare an apple to a cucumber.

They started because they took the side of Trayvon Martin over Zimmerman, whom he almost killed. I saw video of one of their events in Des Moines, Iowa, and it was all woke-privilege rich white kids who have decided that blacks cannot manage on their own. You never did give me a statistic of how many unarmed blacks were killed by police--I think that I heard the number of nine a year. Blacks committed over a half million crimes against whites a couple of years ago against white crimes against blacks totaling about 56 thousand. I think that more unarmed whites are killed by police than blacks. Middle-class blacks know this and that is the reason that they are returning to the party of Abraham Lincoln and leaving the party of the plantation owners.

 

[Benjamin]

Which is why it's not a racist organization and cannot be directly compared to the KKK.
It is just as evil as the KKK, but it's not racist.

 

[AustinC]

I hope you realize that I have no idea what your YouTube link is and therefore will not click the link.
Use words please.

 

[Revmitchell]

I wonder who the knucklehead is that believes BLM is doing a lot of good is.

 

[Benjamin]

I hope you realize that I have no idea what your YouTube link is and therefore will not click the link.
Use words please.

Simply by the title you should have known the drift. The video demonstrates that BLM members involved in the rhetoric coming out of that organization are feeling justified to kill white people for no other reason that they are white WHICH CLEARLY contradicts your argument that I quoted and replied to with the video.