Is Christine Ford credible?

[Reynolds]

So then why is every conservative pundit on Fox saying she's credible? Hannity, Wallace (no surprise), even Lou Dobbs, even Piro, Tucker, everyone! The only honest pundit who I could find saying she was not credible and likely lying was good ol Candace Owens.

Fox News is all over the place. I only listen to Hannity on radio. On radio, I have not heard Hannity say she was credible. All I have heard him say is she thinks Cavenaugh assaulted her, but all the evidence refutes that.

 

[Reynolds]

They are being politically correct. They just can't come out and say she's a ditz.

Yeah. As Barney Fife says she "is a nut".
The people who believes her are bigger nuts.

 

[HopefulNChrist]

It has to be more of a major political move than a wish to inform others about a person taking an important office; as if he wasn't holding one before that. You have to suspect why she is making the allegations known now, and it is for pro choice.

Wish there was another country for Christians to go to, but there isn't. Signs of the times.

As long as they continue to teach the evolution theory in schools as a fact and presented in the media as a fact, there will always be rational support for bullying in schools as in naturally selecting the weak and the vulnerable for "extinction", as well as practical choice for abortion which is the ultimate form of bullying.

Our nation is not a Christian nation. It is a Freemason nation. It will not last with the evolution theory being presented as a fact. As if our country does not know what Nazis Germany was thriving from whence that superior race mentality was stemming from..

Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man. 9 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in princes.

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

Whatever you do, don't join the "civil war" if and when it should ever break out. Do not let "them winning" provoke you to war.

John 16:1These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should not be offended. 2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. 3 And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.

Excommunication or the commandment to withdraw from society seems to be the only solution left when mocking manipulators in the media and politics wins popular opinions in swaying a nation naturally selecting its citizens & future citizens to extinction.

Yes, I am mad, but He helps me by not allowing Satan to get a grip on my anger in tempting me to sin. He lifts up my head to see that Jesus Christ is Lord, and to forgive them because they don't know what they are doing.

 

[Yeshua1]

I keep hearing this over and over. "She came off very credible." Um how? Are we judging just by demeanor? Since when do we do that? Don't we listen to the story and all the details and weigh its believability? Do we just gage the witnesse's emoting?

I'm in the minority. I did not think she sounded credible. No one knows for sure, but judging by the testimony, Kavanaugh is much more credible. Hundreds of times more credible. Below is a list of things that undermine Ford's credibility.

From Nolte on Breitbart.

• 
  
  
  • She has aligned herself with the far-left.
  • She straight-up lied about being afraid to fly.
  • She said she wanted anonymity but continually reached out to the far-left Washington Post.
  • Her polygraph is a farce.
  • Her story has been carefully weaved into a Kafka-esque nightmare no man (even with detailed calendars) can ever escape from.
  • Every single one of her witnesses refutes her story — has no memory of the gathering in question or says it doesn’t happen, and this includes a lifelong friend.
  • Her team was so desperate to have The Woman Who Wants Anonymity to testify publicly, they turned down the opportunity to have her questioned in private at her home in California — and then lied about it.
  • Ford’s therapist’s notes from 2012 also refute here tale, even as the media and Democrats try to gaslight us into believing the opposite. Ford originally claimed four boys tried to rape her when she was in her late teens in the mid-eighties. Now she says it was one rapist and one bystander when she was 15 in the early eighties.
  • Ford refused to give her therapist’s notes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • In the statement she wrote out in her farce of a polygraph test, Ford crossed out “early 80’s” so it would only read “80’s.”
  • Ford told the Committee the “primary impact” of the event occurred during the “four years after” it happened. She goes on to say, “I struggled academically. I struggled very much in Chapel Hill and in College. When I was 17 I went off to college, I had a very hard time.” Note how she skips over two whole years, her junior and senior years in high school; the two school years directly after the attack (unless it did indeed happen in her late teens).
  • To later confirm the event did in fact happen in 1982, Ford told the Committee she was able to pin it down to 1982 because she remembered she did not yet have her drivers’ license. But… she also says she doesn’t remember how she got to or from the house party, so how does she know she didn’t drive herself?
  • Ford also used Mark Judge’s Safeway job to confirm the 1982 timeline. She testified she saw him working there 6-8 weeks after the attack. She could not yet drive, so her mother drove her there, but for some bizarre reason Ford and her mother entered the Safeway using different doors. (And now mom can’t confirm this happened!)
  • Five times during her testimony she mentioned Safeway to verify the date. How could she know such a thing unless it really happened? Well, in his memoir (which began circulating online among Kavanaugh critics in the week before Ford’s testimony) Judge helpfully reveals he was working at the “local supermarket” during the “summer before senior year.”
  • In summation: On top of all four of her own witnesses refuting her allegations against Kavanaugh, so too do the notes taken by her own therapist. (Margot Cleveland’s tweet thread was indispensable for much of this — you will want to readit all.)

[FONT=verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Also from another BB writer:
[/FONT]

[FONT=verdana, Arial, sans-serif]

• 
  
  
  • In a suburban home in Maryland there was no downstairs bathroom?

• 
  
  
  • She didn’t hear two very drunk and belligerent boys try to sneak up on her?

• 
  
  
  • Why was music already on in a room no one was using?

• 
  
  
  • Wouldn’t blasting the music ensure someone came upstairs to see what was going on, especially whoever’s house it was? This is completely counterintuitive to criminal behavior.

• 
  
  
  • After she locked herself in the bathroom, Brett and Mark didn’t try to get at her? Didn’t jiggle the doorknob? Didn’t try to claim they were kidding? All tuned up for a rape, they just gave up and went downstairs like nothing happened?

• 
  
  
  • She left without telling her best friend?

• 
  
  
  • She left without WARNING her friend there were two rapists in the house?

• 
  
  
  • No one asked why she was leaving or found it strange enough to ask her the following day why she just vanished from the party?

• 
  
  
  • She can remember how many beers she had (one) but not whose house she was in, how she got home, the date, the place, how many people were there (sometimes it’s 4, or 5 or 6), or anything solid?

[/FONT]​

[FONT=verdana, Arial, sans-serif][/FONT]

She appears to believe what she is spewing forth, but I think due to her swiss cheese memory, someone else helped in fill in the blanks, so is sincere, but remebers false mememories!

 

[HopefulNChrist]

She appears to believe what she is spewing forth, but I think due to her swiss cheese memory, someone else helped in fill in the blanks, so is sincere, but remebers false mememories!

I believe her intentions are political more than anything else. One doesn't fumbled with memory unless otherwise motivated for that purpose. Who ever heard of anyone coming forward with confidence to derail a nomination, but with unsure memory?

She claims afterwards that she walked up to the other guy that was in that room that was being a bag man at a grocery store and she says "Hello"? That other guy was laughing at her while she was being sexually assaulted? What traumatized victim does that? She wanted to make that event to show how ashamed the other guy was, but what is that coming from her?!!!

Unreal. So it has to be more about politics in derailing the nomination than anything else.

 

[HankD]

I don't believe there will be a vote for Kavanaugh - McConnell - "we don't have the votes".

 

[Calminian]

I don't believe there will be a vote for Kavanaugh - McConnell - "we don't have the votes".

link?

 

[Calminian]

Never a dull moment.


SHE’S A FRAUD: Dr. Ford Lied About Flying, Tight Spaces, Closed Quarters, Polygraph Tests and Never Mentioned Sexual Assault to Boyfriend

The boyfriend wrote the Judiciary Committee about the relationship:

– Ford never mentioned sexual assault
– Ford never mentioned Kavanaugh
– Ford not scared of confined spaces
– Ford not scared of flying
– Ford knew how to beat polygraph
– Ford cheated on him/committed fraud



BOOM! Former Long-Time Boyfriend of Christine Ford DROPS A BOMB! — Proves FORD LIED UNDER OATH to Senate Committee!

A Former long-time boyfriend of Dr. Christine Ford told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he witnessed Dr. Ford coaching a friend on how to take a polygraph examination.

 

[SovereignGrace]

I keep hearing this over and over. "She came off very credible." Um how? Are we judging just by demeanor? Since when do we do that? Don't we listen to the story and all the details and weigh its believability? Do we just gage the witnesse's emoting?

I'm in the minority. I did not think she sounded credible. No one knows for sure, but judging by the testimony, Kavanaugh is much more credible. Hundreds of times more credible. Below is a list of things that undermine Ford's credibility.

From Nolte on Breitbart.

• 
  
  
  • She has aligned herself with the far-left.
  • She straight-up lied about being afraid to fly.
  • She said she wanted anonymity but continually reached out to the far-left Washington Post.
  • Her polygraph is a farce.
  • Her story has been carefully weaved into a Kafka-esque nightmare no man (even with detailed calendars) can ever escape from.
  • Every single one of her witnesses refutes her story — has no memory of the gathering in question or says it doesn’t happen, and this includes a lifelong friend.
  • Her team was so desperate to have The Woman Who Wants Anonymity to testify publicly, they turned down the opportunity to have her questioned in private at her home in California — and then lied about it.
  • Ford’s therapist’s notes from 2012 also refute here tale, even as the media and Democrats try to gaslight us into believing the opposite. Ford originally claimed four boys tried to rape her when she was in her late teens in the mid-eighties. Now she says it was one rapist and one bystander when she was 15 in the early eighties.
  • Ford refused to give her therapist’s notes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • In the statement she wrote out in her farce of a polygraph test, Ford crossed out “early 80’s” so it would only read “80’s.”
  • Ford told the Committee the “primary impact” of the event occurred during the “four years after” it happened. She goes on to say, “I struggled academically. I struggled very much in Chapel Hill and in College. When I was 17 I went off to college, I had a very hard time.” Note how she skips over two whole years, her junior and senior years in high school; the two school years directly after the attack (unless it did indeed happen in her late teens).
  • To later confirm the event did in fact happen in 1982, Ford told the Committee she was able to pin it down to 1982 because she remembered she did not yet have her drivers’ license. But… she also says she doesn’t remember how she got to or from the house party, so how does she know she didn’t drive herself?
  • Ford also used Mark Judge’s Safeway job to confirm the 1982 timeline. She testified she saw him working there 6-8 weeks after the attack. She could not yet drive, so her mother drove her there, but for some bizarre reason Ford and her mother entered the Safeway using different doors. (And now mom can’t confirm this happened!)
  • Five times during her testimony she mentioned Safeway to verify the date. How could she know such a thing unless it really happened? Well, in his memoir (which began circulating online among Kavanaugh critics in the week before Ford’s testimony) Judge helpfully reveals he was working at the “local supermarket” during the “summer before senior year.”
  • In summation: On top of all four of her own witnesses refuting her allegations against Kavanaugh, so too do the notes taken by her own therapist. (Margot Cleveland’s tweet thread was indispensable for much of this — you will want to readit all.)

[FONT=verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Also from another BB writer:
[/FONT]

[FONT=verdana, Arial, sans-serif]

• 
  
  
  • In a suburban home in Maryland there was no downstairs bathroom?

• 
  
  
  • She didn’t hear two very drunk and belligerent boys try to sneak up on her?

• 
  
  
  • Why was music already on in a room no one was using?

• 
  
  
  • Wouldn’t blasting the music ensure someone came upstairs to see what was going on, especially whoever’s house it was? This is completely counterintuitive to criminal behavior.

• 
  
  
  • After she locked herself in the bathroom, Brett and Mark didn’t try to get at her? Didn’t jiggle the doorknob? Didn’t try to claim they were kidding? All tuned up for a rape, they just gave up and went downstairs like nothing happened?

• 
  
  
  • She left without telling her best friend?

• 
  
  
  • She left without WARNING her friend there were two rapists in the house?

• 
  
  
  • No one asked why she was leaving or found it strange enough to ask her the following day why she just vanished from the party?

• 
  
  
  • She can remember how many beers she had (one) but not whose house she was in, how she got home, the date, the place, how many people were there (sometimes it’s 4, or 5 or 6), or anything solid?

[/FONT]​

[FONT=verdana, Arial, sans-serif][/FONT]

She needs an Oscar for all those crocodile tears she had last Thursday.

 

[SovereignGrace]

She was 100% certain it was Brett Kavanaugh who attempt to rape her 35-36 years ago. Yet she had to continually look at her notes she had written just 24 hours before?

Yeah, that's credible to me.

 

[church mouse guy]

One of her ex-boyfriends claims Ford coached her best friend on how to beat a lie detector years ago. He also said she liked to fly and was not claustrophobic at all. After they broke up, she charged $600 to him and lied until he was going to turn it in as credit card fraud.

 

[HopefulNChrist]

She needs an Oscar for all those crocodile tears she had last Thursday.

When someone has been given a false testimony like that to prevent a nominee from going through, there should be a dire penalty to prevent further crimes of that sort. I hope a national civil lawsuit to sue her for defamation of character gets underway at the very least, otherwise, more Americans can be tempted to come with more slander in the news media and in politics.

Enough is enough. Her crime is a black eye to the real victims of sexual assault; all this to prevent a pro lifer from being voted in. If she had succeeded in derailing the nomination and it was found afterwards that she had lied, a civil war may have erupted between Democrats and Republicans since we all saw how heated both sides of this ordeal was.

She should be arrested if America wished to deter future liars from coming forth like that in the political arena. Indeed, anybody that has a legitimate cause like a sexual assault against any one in political office better speak up long before the national spotlight or else it should be a federal crime when proven a liar.

 

[church mouse guy]

Some say the delay in her testimony was not to get her from California because she already was in Delaware but to allow her time to be coached by professional actors and memorize her story of lies. She did not go to the same high school of the people she accuses and the two groups of high school students did not attend the same functions. Everything about her story is a lie. I agree, she should be referred for perjury.

 

[HankD]

link?

No link. My opinion.

DNC/Soros can't let it happen. There will probably be another disruption that will keep the vote from going to the floor.
There will probably be a great cry go up from the Hill using the marxist tactic of the presumption of accusatory guilt a day or two before the scheduled vote.

Or there will be something else - "the Russians were involved, that needs to be investigated!" - whatever.

They are banking on winning the houses back - they will disrupt the vote at any cost with any fabrication in order to attempt to pave the way to impeach President Trump.

True it's a gamble. I believe Amy Barrett is next in line although she has already been described as a cultist..

 

[church mouse guy]

No link. My opinion.

DNC/Soros can't let it happen. There will probably be another disruption that will keep the vote from going to the floor.
There will probably be a great cry go up from the Hill using the marxist tactic of the presumption of accusatory guilt a day or two before the scheduled vote.

Or there will be something else - "the Russians were involved, that needs to be investigated!" - whatever.

They are banking on winning the houses back - they will disrupt the vote at any cost with any fabrication in order to attempt to pave the way to impeach President Trump.

True it's a gamble. I believe Amy Barrett is next in line although she has already been described as a cultist..

Are we headed for an all female court?

 

[HankD]

Are we headed for an all female court?

No.

 

[Calminian]

I don't think they're going to get Flake. He's already lecturing the President. But I hope the get the nomination without him. That would be perfect.


Is It About Time to Lock Up Christine Ford in a Prison Cell With Two Front Doors?

 

[SovereignGrace]

I don't think they're going to get Flake. He's already lecturing the President. But I hope the get the nomination without him. That would be perfect.


Is It About Time to Lock Up Christine Ford in a Prison Cell With Two Front Doors?

Sen. (Snow)Flake is more Democrat anyways.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

I don't think they're going to get Flake. He's already lecturing the President. But I hope the get the nomination without him. That would be perfect.

Is It About Time to Lock Up Christine Ford in a Prison Cell With Two Front Doors?

He may fall in line. But Candace Owens' Tweets about Ford's lying are rather forceful, and then the "#LockHerUp". I suppose Christian charity precludes providing a cell with just a trapdoor, or even two. But she is far from being the worst "bad actor" in the play they put on.

 

[Calminian]

He may fall in line. But Candace Owens' Tweets about Ford's lying are rather forceful, and then the "#LockHerUp". I suppose Christian charity precludes providing a cell with just a trapdoor, or even two. But she is far from being the worst "bad actor" in the play they put on.

I dunno. She might be. This woman's true colors are being exposed daily.

Family Member: Ford Threw ‘Witness’ Leland Keyser ‘Under Bus’
Friend ‘Blindsided’ by Public Health Humiliation

Leland Keyser’s relative has accused Christine Blasey Ford of throwing her “witness” and lifelong friend–Keyser–“under the bus.”