• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is Every Divorce Recognized by God?

Kai

Well-Known Member
Genesis 2:24 describes a man and woman becoming one flesh in marriage, and Jesus refers to this in Matthew 19:6: “What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.” Matthew 19:9 addresses sexual immorality in the context of divorce, and Paul discusses abandonment by an unbelieving spouse in 1 Corinthians 7:15.

If a couple divorces for reasons apart from those discussed in these passages, how should their marriage be understood biblically? Does the legal divorce itself end the one-flesh union? And if adultery occurs but the couple never obtains a legal divorce, does the adultery itself end the marriage bond in God's eyes, or does the marriage remain intact? What implication would this situation have for remarriage?

I’m interested in hearing how others understand the issue in light of Scripture.
 

Kai

Well-Known Member
Here's my take: Marriage is a covenant established by God, not simply a legal contract between two people (Genesis 2:24).

A couple can obtain a civil divorce for virtually any reason, but that doesn't automatically mean the divorce was justified before God. Jesus makes it clear that not every reason for divorce is acceptable (Matthew 19:4-9). So I would be hesitant to conclude that a legal divorce, by itself, necessarily dissolves the marriage bond in God's eyes.

On the other hand, I don't believe adultery automatically terminates a marriage either. Jesus identifies sexual immorality as an exception in Matthew 19:9, but He doesn't say that the marriage automatically ends when adultery occurs. The innocent spouse is given grounds for divorce, not an obligation to divorce. Reconciliation and forgiveness remain possible.

This also raises an important question about remarriage. If adultery automatically ended a marriage, why would Jesus need to address divorce and remarriage in the same passage? I think the distinction between having biblical grounds for divorce and actually ending the marriage deserves careful consideration.

Ultimately, I believe we should be careful not to treat civil paperwork as having authority over the covenant God established. At the same time, we should recognize that Scripture makes provisions for circumstances in which divorce is permissible.
 
Last edited:

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
Becoming one flesh with a spouse is not some metaphysical union that happens in God’s eyes up in heaven.

It involves merging with someone to transform two separate independent individuals into one united force. This includes sharing time, beliefs, love, and experiences together as a cohesive unit.

Divorce destroys all this mutuality, as it should. The one flesh union must be a living, continuous reality, not an emotional sentimentality.

Remaining friends with a person you divorced does not maintain any deep solid relationship. It is just a casual interaction at best.

Adultery poisons the one flesh bond, which can never be the same again. Adultery can possibly be forgiven, but not forgotten.

I personally cannot comprehend why anyone would stay married to a spouse who committed adultery. My first wife cheated on me repeatedly. I tried to forgive her. We separated for 6 months. I took her back. She did it again. I could not wait to get rid of her. You are vulnerable to various sexually transmitted diseases via adultery. Your heart is broken and you carry that damage into your life.

One flesh is not some sacred contract. It is a practical reality that requires mutual love and respect, teamwork, and heart to heart tenderness.

My second wife and I became one flesh, in spite of my imperfections. Even her death could not dissolve that union, in that our connection persists in my heart as I intensely and perpetually yearn for her.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Is every divorce accepted as biblically supported? Nope.

If a divorce is outside of the requirements of scripture, one of both of the spouses are guilty of adultery in God's eyes.

Is it wrong for a spouse to seek the safety of separation from someone who is seen as a threat? I think not, especially if children are involved.

In our world today we have generations of people who will say one thing, and do another. The only reason for keeping ones word is thought to be benefit. They make the argument that two wrongs make a right. Or an eye for an eye.

The idea of considering another as more important than ourselves is outside the cultural norms of today.

I have been blessed, being the husband of one wife, who knows what mother's day is all about, and has it in mind every time I hug one of my great grandchildren.
 

Kai

Well-Known Member
If a divorce is outside of the requirements of scripture, one of both of the spouses are guilty of adultery in God's eyes.

Thank you for your answer.

Suppose both parties divorced in a way that was contrary to Scripture. Would their only choices then be to reconcile later, or would they have to remain single for the rest of their lives to avoid committing adultery with another partner?
 

Mike B

Active Member
1 Corinthians 7:
27 Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife.

28 But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned; and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned. Nevertheless
such shall have trouble in the flesh: but I spare you.

1 Cor. 7 is all about this subject.

I fear speaking about the honest truth of my past, but it is what it is, and I have prayed
for the Lord's forgiveness. Been married to the same, wonderful woman now for over
24 years.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Thank you for your answer.

Suppose both parties divorced in a way that was contrary to Scripture. Would their only choices then be to reconcile later, or would they have to remain single for the rest of their lives to avoid committing adultery with another partner?
I am unaware of any loop hole in the rule, so even if both parties believe in their own minds, they were the innocent spouse, God knows our heart, so I do not see a way around committing adultery for either or both. I have not studied this matter, so I put it forward as my casual assessment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kai
Genesis 2:24 describes a man and woman becoming one flesh in marriage, and Jesus refers to this in Matthew 19:6: “What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.” Matthew 19:9 addresses sexual immorality in the context of divorce, and Paul discusses abandonment by an unbelieving spouse in 1 Corinthians 7:15.

If a couple divorces for reasons apart from those discussed in these passages, how should their marriage be understood biblically? Does the legal divorce itself end the one-flesh union? And if adultery occurs but the couple never obtains a legal divorce, does the adultery itself end the marriage bond in God's eyes, or does the marriage remain intact? What implication would this situation have for remarriage?

I’m interested in hearing how others understand the issue in light of Scripture.
From teachings and studies I have experienced over the years God does not recognize every divorce.

God recognizes divorce is taking place only if 1) sexual sins - Matthew 5:32______ 2) being married to an unbeliever and that unbeliever abandons the marriage 1 Corinthians 5:17 ________ 3) Ephesians 5:28 is used to indicate an abusive marriage but it is not directly stated.

Jesus describes adultery as one who has been divorced and marries another commits adultery and the one that they marry is committing adultery - Matthew 5:32......

A question is what initiates a marriage - it's not the paperwork or the saying I do but the sexual intercourse. One will say legally married with paperwork standing before judge or preacher and saying I do - witnesses and agreements doing so several times will have several spouses (x'es) in that aspect but each and every other person one had sexual interludes with was your husband or your wife...... This is recognized last but it should be first. We look at it from the eyes of man we should look at it from the eyes of God.


. The Covenant Vows ("Holding Fast")

• Binding Agreement: In the Bible, marriage is treated as a sworn covenant before God rather than a casual arrangement, a feeling, or a temporary contract.
• Verbal Declaration: Ancient Hebrew and biblical traditions often emphasized mutual public declarations of belonging, such as "She is my wife, and I am her husband" (seen in prophetic and historical contexts like Hosea or early Jewish documents).
• Leaving and Cleaving: The transition involves a formal break from one's household of origin and an intentional, permanent attachment to a new partner.

2. Public Witness and Recognition

• Community Context: Biblical marriages were not secret or purely private affairs; they were recognized by the family, community, and public witness.
• The Role of Consent: Both parties (and traditionally families in ancient cultures) entered into the union voluntarily with clear intent to form a household and serve God together.

3. Sexual Consummation ("One Flesh")

• Physical Union: The physical act of sexual intercourse completes and seals the "one flesh" union introduced in Genesis 2:24.
• Not Sex Alone: Mainstream biblical theology distinguishes between a covenant commitment and physical intimacy alone. Scripture does not treat casual or premarital sex by itself as a full marriage, as sex requires the framework of covenantal responsibility, fidelity, and public context.

Before man started all the ceremonies it was different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kai

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
Peter Ruckman defined marriage primarily as a physical union ("flesh joined to flesh") rather than strictly a legal contract or a religious ceremony.
 

Kai

Well-Known Member
Peter Ruckman defined marriage primarily as a physical union ("flesh joined to flesh") rather than strictly a legal contract or a religious ceremony.

I make a point of taking anything Peter Ruckman taught with a grain of salt, though he could be right about that. If I remember correctly, he was also married three times.
 

Ascetic X

Well-Known Member
I make a point of taking anything Peter Ruckman taught with a grain of salt, though he could be right about that. If I remember correctly, he was also married three times.
Ruckman’s definition of marriage as sexual intercourse is not compatible with modern society. In a promiscuous reality, it would mean that many men had lots of wives, etc.
 
Top