Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If God were fair, we'd all be going to Hell. Instead, He chose to die for the sins of all men, in spite of whether they would accept him or reject him. That's most definitely unfair.Originally posted by Ken Hamilton:
1) Is there any Biblical basis for insisting on the idea that God is "fair"?
2) For those of you who are parents, how do you respond when your child says, "But that isn't fair!"?
Ken
Then, Scott, from a fair/unfair standpoint, you have no problem with God regenerating(giving the new birth) to some but not to all based on His free, sovereign grace, right?Originally posted by ScottEmerson:
If God were fair, we'd all be going to Hell. Instead, He chose to die for the sins of all men, in spite of whether they would accept him or reject him. That's most definitely unfair.
Justice is a doing what is legally correct. That is not fairness. Fairness means everyone is treated exactly alike. If God must treat everyone exactly alike to be "fair", then He not sovereign and free to act according to His purposes as stated in Romans 9 as the Potter.Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
There is no attribute called the Fairness of God; we do, however, know of the justice of God which indicates to us that He just in all of His dealings with humankind.
God is totally fair...
Ah, but Helen, one man is not sovereign over another man, he is answerable to God. God is answerable to no one but Himself, He is the Potter.Originally posted by Helen:
In Colossians 4:1, slavemasters are told to provide their slaves with what is right and fair. Why? because you know that you also have a Master in heaven.
Then you will understand what is right and just and fair -- every good path.For wisdom will enter your heart, and knowledge will be pleasant to your soul.
Unless one is an Open Theist, one must believe that God created humans whom He knew would not be saved and end up in hell. Arminians or Semi-Pelagians or non-Calvinists(whatever you want to call them) don't get a pass on that issue.Originally posted by Eric B:
The context shows that the "Potter" makes his vessels for a purpose, not just to damn people "just for the hell of it" (pardon the pun!)
Once again, the problem is people seeming to think that creating people for destruction is the exclusive defining mark of "sovereignty".
Then, Scott, from a fair/unfair standpoint, you have no problem with God regenerating(giving the new birth) to some but not to all based on His free, sovereign grace, right?</font>[/QUOTE]He allows all a chance. Those who say yes, he regenerates. Those who say no, he does not. That is fairness, wouldn't you say?Originally posted by Ken Hamilton:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ScottEmerson:
If God were fair, we'd all be going to Hell. Instead, He chose to die for the sins of all men, in spite of whether they would accept him or reject him. That's most definitely unfair.
No, Scott. Everyone doesn't get the exact same equal chance to hear the gospel. Everyone doesn't get the exact same equal chance to say yes or no, even in the system you advocate.Originally posted by ScottEmerson:
He allows all a chance. Those who say yes, he regenerates. Those who say no, he does not. That is fairness, wouldn't you say?
I never said anything about equal chance now, did I? Calvinism states that the majority of people don't even have such a chance. I would maintain that Scripturally, there is no such unequalness of opportunity. Such a notion is built more on logic than Scripture - see my reply to Pastor Larry for that.Originally posted by Ken Hamilton:
A Calvinist has no problem Scripturally with the unequalness of opportunity. It's the free-willers that have to work through that difficulty in their system.
These types of statements are extremely inappropriate and out of place. We do not borrow the blasphemy of the world for theological purposes. This will not be tolerated, intended or not.Originally posted by Eric B:
The context shows that the "Potter" makes his vessels for a purpose, not just to damn people "just for the hell of it" (pardon the pun!)
I don't try to argue on something like that, as God's timeless realm is vastly different from what we understand. But trying to use this logical premise (God knows who will go to Hell) to argue for Him deliberately decreeing them there is going beyond the scripture.Unless one is an Open Theist, one must believe that God created humans whom He knew would not be saved and end up in hell. Arminians or Semi-Pelagians or non-Calvinists(whatever you want to call them) don't get a pass on that issue.
So His wrath and power are only made known by sending people to Hell? We don't even know who will end up in Hell in the end, so what is being shown to anyone in that case? Something is being shown to people NOW, and the context makes this clear.The purpose for those who end up in hell is, according to Romans 9:22 is to "show His wrath and to make His power known".
My point was, the passage is about Israel, not everyone who will end up in Hell. They are the ones who Paul anticipated resistance from, because this was very offensive to their whole notion of salvation by inheritance and works of the Law. That is the whole theme we see in both Paul and Jesus when it comes to their dealing with the Jews. They were hardened to show the Gentiles grace, and to make them jealous as other passages point out. V.33 on support this as well. We must not read some new meaning into it, thinking it is right just because what we've concocted is "hard" to the man's reasoning.One can kick against the concept all he wants but the Bible as a whole teaches that God is the Potter and man is the clay. And the apostle Paul anticipated such resistance in Romans 9:19-21. Man's natural reasoning is unable to accept the concept(1 Corinthians 2:14).
It's not a statement that I go aroung using, but I didn't realize it was considered "blasphemy". (Blasphemy is against God, not Hell). But sorry if you see it that way.These types of statements are extremely inappropriate and out of place. We do not borrow the blasphemy of the world for theological purposes. This will not be tolerated, intended or not.
Moderator
I am a single predestinarian. I don't believe anyone is decreed to end up in hell.Originally posted by Eric B:
But trying to use this logical premise (God knows who will go to Hell) to argue for Him deliberately decreeing them there is going beyond the scripture.
So His wrath and power are only made known by sending people to Hell?
Ray,Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
sending the majority off to Hell.
People end up in Hell because they will it to happen.
Not an Arminian teaching. A common sense one. Simply look at the stats, man.Originally posted by Ken Hamilton:
Where do you get the idea that a majority of all people who have ever lived will end up in hell? Is that an Arminian teaching?