Only ones they've built up themselves eg the Chinese PLA. The officer class in Germany were different: they in many respects chose Hitler and he allowed them largely to keep their positions
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Seriously? One of the hallmarks of leftism is to spend money on social programs and deny the military money.All sounds leftist to me. Communists love strong militaries. Military hawkishness is neither right nor left.
Hitler outlawed Communism because he was Nazi. Not really all that different in ideology. Both were struggling for power.Seriously? One of the hallmarks of leftism is to spend money on social programs and deny the military money.
If you are saying communism is leftist then you must agree that Nazism was far right fascism, simply by the fact that Hitler outlawed communism!
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL
When the minimum wage increased, McDonalds replaced workers with self-order kiosks.
Is the goal really to eliminate all entry level positions?
It is not a "one size fits all" question.
Setting aside "minimum wages", it is my "health care premiums" rising at 30% per year that dwarf any issues with salary. The difference between a $2000 deductible last year and a $7000 deductible this year REALLY matters.
FASCISM:
the definition of fascism
IMO the CAUSE of fascism is an aberration which comes out of perverted patriotism (left or right - which is an expression of love of country).
Note: it is "perversion" a wrong over-reaction coming out of a real or imagined or propagandized expectation of the coming destruction of one's government or one's actual country.
My opinion.
Actually, it is. When a person works 40 hrs/wk in America they should not be in poverty.When the minimum wage increased, McDonalds replaced workers with self-order kiosks.
Is the goal really to eliminate all entry level positions?
It is not a "one size fits all" question.
Setting aside "minimum wages", it is my "health care premiums" rising at 30% per year that dwarf any issues with salary. The difference between a $2000 deductible last year and a $7000 deductible this year REALLY matters.
That's why we need to provide a decent safety net for the poor in this country like all other industrialized nations do.Most? We have a huge chicken plant here. Most of their workforce is part time. Management hates it. Management wants full time employees. Most of the workforce will not work over 16 hours per week because the income disqualifies them from govt. programs.
They refuse full time work to keep welfare.
My great grandmother and great grand father left the reservation. They left it to better themselves. My grandmother talked all the time about how glad she was her Mammy and Pappy left. She said they give you just enough money to KEEP you living poor. The social programs keep the Indians on the reservation, the blacks on the plantation, and have drug the rest of the ethnic groups down to the plantation as well.
I'd say that the U.S. doesn't provide a realistic safety net for the needy as do all other industrialized societies.I see you are still spouting the arbitrary and unrealistic standard that the church should buy everyone health care insurance as to why private charities can't provide for the poor. Since the church can't (or won't) do this you say that private charities are a failure.
They're not. Federal poverty level for a single person is $12,060 or less annual income. A person working full time earning minimum wage would make an annual income of $15,080.Actually, it is. When a person works 40 hrs/wk in America they should not be in poverty.
I would say you live on Fantasy Island.I'd say that the U.S. doesn't provide a realistic safety net for the needy as do all other industrialized societies.
Actually, it is. When a person works 40 hrs/wk in America they should not be in poverty.
S
I would say you live on Fantasy Island.
No one owes you their labour with such an attitude!Says who? Just because one works 40 hours does not mean they get paid what they want. If you do not make what you need then go somewhere else where you are more valuable. No one owes you a living.
I'd say that the U.S. doesn't provide a realistic safety net for the needy as do all other industrialized societies.
I agree that the gross annual salary for a person working at the Federal minimum wage of $7.25 is about $15,080. All wages are subject to a FICA tax of 7.65% which leaves a take-home pay of $13,926. The average family size is 2.54 people/household. and the federal poverty rate by size of household is:They're not. Federal poverty level for a single person is $12,060 or less annual income. A person working full time earning minimum wage would make an annual income of $15,080.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL
I agree that the gross annual salary for a person working at the Federal minimum wage of $7.25 is about $15,080. All wages are subject to a FICA tax of 7.65% which leaves a take-home pay of $13,926. The average family size is 2.54 people/household. and the federal poverty rate by size of household is:
1 - $12,140
2 - $16,160
3 - $20,780
The minimum wage will marginally support a single person but not a couple. of course then there's the cost of an apartment. The median cost of a 1BR in Indianapolis is $690/mo. I just pick that as what i consider to be an average city. Even in a small town I doubt you could beat that by much. Housing costs would then be $8,280 excluding utilities. That means a person making the minimum wage would have $5,650 for EVERYTHING ELSE including food and medical. Think you could do that?
All wages are subject to a FICA tax of 7.65%