That was a one off, as His normal form is Spirit!What???
Luke 3:22
and the Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form, like a dove...
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That was a one off, as His normal form is Spirit!What???
Luke 3:22
and the Holy Spirit descended on him in bodily form, like a dove...
Yes indeed, as think that is the expressed purpose for many who hold to Icons!
not all movies or tv shows on Jesus would cause one to do that though!If we have reverence towards Jesus and religious affection certainly it will be unavoidable that some of that affection should terminate on the picture he use as a representation. This is idolatry,
it rises to the level of idolatry if one either thinks that is the real Jesus, or else is praying to and worshipping the actor then?
I think that it was against making image of the unseen God, but in Jesus we now see God in a physical form!No, it is still idolatry and an act of piety to use a picture as an image of Jesus even if we do not think that the image is accurate. Even some pagans recognized that the images they made to represent their gods were not accurate. The Commandment is simply to make no carved image or likeness of Yahweh at all, (Deuteronomy 4:15-18) so that it is unlawful in itself to make any image of either the Father, Son, or Holy Spirit. Trying to depict our God is how we corrupt ourselves, the making of such images is itself corrupting ourselves. (Deuteronomy 4:16)
I think that it was against making image of the unseen God, but in Jesus we now see God in a physical form!
This is idolatry,
not all movies or tv shows on Jesus would cause one to do that though!
I would tend to see this as being based upon conviction and preference, for if you sense that it would be sin to watch Jesus on a movie show, to you would be a sin!Yeshua1, your response seems to indicate that you agree with Noah that it could be idolatry, but not always. What conclusion would those who are aware of the fact that you watched the movie/tv program come to? Were you indulging in idolatry or not? Who knows?
1Th 5:22 KJV - Abstain from all appearance of evil.
I prefer to practice the advise in the passage quoted. I do not what to put myself in a position where I have to explain my actions to my fellow believers. (Hope this makes sense. )
Despite certain views (mostly Reformed confessional) that attempting to picture Jesus in art, plays, or movies is a violation of the second commandment (which then nullifies most of the great art of centuries as well as the early and modern passion plays; e.g. BJU and its art museum) — on the other hand such items and events have done much to draw people to a saving faith in Christ.
The Jesus Film in particular is a key example, and for most people I suspect the second commandment is interpreted to prohibit representation of the Father or Holy Spirit as being spirit and therefore not permissible to have graven image likenesses.
You have evidence that those actors were NOT part of the Body of Christ?Wesley, do you honestly think that your post was a refutation of my #4 post?
Jesus has never been on tv, movies or the internet.
I would tend to see this as being based upon conviction and preference, for if you sense that it would be sin to watch Jesus on a movie show, to you would be a sin!
But it is not really watching Jesus on TV by watching a man who is not Jesus play Jesus as an actor. It is to count him a representation of Christ who is not Christ Himself. No one can prove that such idolatry is not even more hated by God than homosexuality. Both practices are abominations to Him.
or to films such as the Jesus one used by Campus Crusade worldwide for outreach?Why should God object to passion plays?
I still like the Jesus Film and I gave 3 copies of it for Christmas gifts and I am using the cell phone app which has the film broken down in 61 parts to send a clip regularly to another friend. I think that they are headquartered in Orlando now. I have given away several copies over the years and have watched it many times myself. I always liked Bill Bright and his wife and I am grateful to the Hunts for donating the money to make the film.
Is it saving faith that people are drawn to by the films or carnal faith? No one needs to be regenerated by the Holy Spirit and effectually drawn by the Father in order to love an image meant to depict the Savior. It is loving Christ and coming to Him by faith that is impossible apart from the regenerating work of the Spirit of God.
A passion play acts out Scripture for those who cannot read and write so that they may have insight to what Scripture teaches. I think that such passion plays are ancient. You may have a good point that they attract people for carnal reasons. Church music may be in the same category, although music was used in the Old Testament.
I would argue in reference to those who cannot read that they can still listen to the Word read. I am not against music. I am against attempting to depict any of the three persons of the Trinity. I would say what such images teach people are lies as they represent either the Father, Son, or Holy Spirit other than the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is. “So belief cometh of hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ.” (Romans 10:17 ASV)
So you have an illiterate person in Indianapolis who has no idea about everyday life in Israel 2000 years ago....why can't you show them the Jesus film where the dialogue is all from the book of Luke and the filming was done in Israel?
No one has ever watched Jesus in a movie.I would tend to see this as being based upon conviction and preference, for if you sense that it would be sin to watch Jesus on a movie show, to you would be a sin!