IfbReformer
New Member
Well its that time of year again and the question always comes up.
I just wrote an article for my site that deals with this subject.
Here are some excerpts:
Thanks,
I look forward to you responses.
IFBReformer
I just wrote an article for my site that deals with this subject.
Here are some excerpts:
Please read the full article at http://www.ifbreformation.org/IsChristmasWrong.htmlIn 2003, if we were to ask the average Christian "Should we as Christians celebrate Christmas? - we would here a resounding "yes!". But this was not always the case. Since the first official celebration of Christmas in 340 A.D. under the order of the Roman Emperor Constantine, there have been many Christians who refused to celebrate Christmas.
The question we will seek to answer here is not whether there have been Christians throughout the centuries who have opposed Christmas - that fact we concede. The question we will seek to answer in this article is whether or not Christians of the past (and present) were right in opposing the observation of Christmas...
What are the reasons some Christians have opposed celebrating Christmas? Well, there are two main arguments that are made. The first is it is never commanded in the scriptures to take a special day and celebrate the birth of Christ. This leads many separatists to say if is not commanded, we may not do it. The other reason is that Christmas replaced or was made over a pagan celebration. Therefore it is poisoned with what used to be pagan symbols and cannot be used by Christians...
In its original context, when Romans 14 speaks of some considering certain days sacred and others considering every day alike they were speaking of the Jewish holy days and festivals. The stronger Christian in this context, was the one who realized he was no longer under compulsion to keep the dietary laws, holy days and festivals.
But the principle that is taught here is much greater. It is that there are disputable matters that Christians ought not "to judge someone else's servant" about. It is an unfortunate fact that most of the Christians today that oppose the celebration of Christmas are fundamentalist. This is not to say that most fundamentalists oppose Christmas, because in most IFB churches I have ever seen they do not. But there are some on the fringes that do and they make up most of the Christians that oppose Christmas today.
Actually I will say that those fundamentalists today who oppose Christmas are simply taking the modern day fundamentalist fault of "passing judgment on disputable matters" to its logical conclusion. They take their idea that if it is not in scripture not only are they not obligated to observe it, but they also vehemently condemn those Christians that do as "worldly compromisers"...
It is one thing to simply choose not to celebrate Christmas, it is quite another to make it a doctrinal issue and condemn and judge those Christian brethren that do. Those who judge other Christians for celebrating Christmas have clearly gone "beyond what is written" and are "passing judgment on disputable matters".
The second argument of those who oppose the celebration of Christmas by Christians is one that is more intimidating to many Christians. They say "because it has pagan origins, we as Christians should not celebrate it"...
So here in Acts,Peter quoting the prophecy of David about Christ, uses the word 'hades' to speak of where Christ was and in direct correlation to the Hebrew Sheol. But 'hades' was refering to a pagan God and place - how could Peter as well as his Lord use this word if it they considered it wrong to use things with pagan origins? This is a prime example of how we can claim things from a pagan culture and turn them to good use for God.
If it is wrong for us to celebrate the birth of Christ on a day that used to be used to honor a pagan deity, then how was it right for Christ and his Apostles to use a pagan deity to teach about the after life?
Not to get into much detail here, but even the Christian practice of baptism was pagan in origin. The Greeks and other cultures were using the practice to purify themselves among other things for hundreds of years before Christ. The church fathers Tertullian and Justin Martyr both plainly acknowledged the pagan origins of water baptism. Yet God took this pagan practice, and used it for his purpose and plan.
So the belief that Christians may not take things that have pagan origins and turn them to use for Christ falls on its face when compared with the example of the New Testament...
Thanks,
I look forward to you responses.
IFBReformer