Gregory Perry Sr.
Active Member
Two Things....
#1...I believe Obama is..at the very least pro-Islam and anti-Constitutional. I personally believe he is for all practical purposes a traitor to the principles of the founding fathers of our nation. However, He is in "power" because God allowed him to be. As Christians we have to acknowledge the possibility that God's purpose MAY JUST BE to bring this nation into and under the judgement that "we so richly DESERVE" because we have collectively abandoned Him and His ways of Righteousness.
#2.... David Barton is not infallible and as such will always be prone to error. However..the article posted in the OP is a good one and all that stuff is a matter of public record as far as I can tell. I believe in as much as he can be he is as good a man as any of the rest of us and I support his apparent motive to bring the citizens of our country back to an awareness of the spiritual nature of the roots we were founded on as a nation. Let us NOT "throw the baby out with the bathwater". Where he is wrong in his view of "history" he must be corrected. I read a statement he made where he said he has "documentation" to support his assertions. If so, he definitely needs to share it. Some of his documentation may be faulty...who knows...or it could be right...again..who REALLY knows. In any case...I'm not willing to completely discard all his work because it fails to meet OUR misplaced "standard" of historical PERFECTION. Sometimes...as you are eating that watermelon with ALL ITS SWEETNESS...you have to spit out those annoying little seeds! By the way...as far as I can tell, David's "worldview" is the same as ours (for the most part) and there is NO DENYING that the secular historians (revisionists) are trying to bury ANY mention of the spiritual heritage our country was founded on. Barton has stuck his very public NECK on a very public "chopping block"...would we do the same????
OBAMA has to go...I agree...but...are we prepared for the Mormon/Catholic ticket that may follow? That would raise a whole new set of questions...wouldn't it now!:type:
Bro.Greg
#1...I believe Obama is..at the very least pro-Islam and anti-Constitutional. I personally believe he is for all practical purposes a traitor to the principles of the founding fathers of our nation. However, He is in "power" because God allowed him to be. As Christians we have to acknowledge the possibility that God's purpose MAY JUST BE to bring this nation into and under the judgement that "we so richly DESERVE" because we have collectively abandoned Him and His ways of Righteousness.
#2.... David Barton is not infallible and as such will always be prone to error. However..the article posted in the OP is a good one and all that stuff is a matter of public record as far as I can tell. I believe in as much as he can be he is as good a man as any of the rest of us and I support his apparent motive to bring the citizens of our country back to an awareness of the spiritual nature of the roots we were founded on as a nation. Let us NOT "throw the baby out with the bathwater". Where he is wrong in his view of "history" he must be corrected. I read a statement he made where he said he has "documentation" to support his assertions. If so, he definitely needs to share it. Some of his documentation may be faulty...who knows...or it could be right...again..who REALLY knows. In any case...I'm not willing to completely discard all his work because it fails to meet OUR misplaced "standard" of historical PERFECTION. Sometimes...as you are eating that watermelon with ALL ITS SWEETNESS...you have to spit out those annoying little seeds! By the way...as far as I can tell, David's "worldview" is the same as ours (for the most part) and there is NO DENYING that the secular historians (revisionists) are trying to bury ANY mention of the spiritual heritage our country was founded on. Barton has stuck his very public NECK on a very public "chopping block"...would we do the same????
OBAMA has to go...I agree...but...are we prepared for the Mormon/Catholic ticket that may follow? That would raise a whole new set of questions...wouldn't it now!:type:
Bro.Greg