• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is our theology derived mainly from the Gospels or Epistles then?

JonShaff

Fellow Servant
Site Supporter
No doubt, the entirety of Scripture is profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in Righteousness. I simply believe that the Epistles are highly didactic, thus, more evidently doctrinal--Orthodoxy. Obviously epistles deal with practice as well--orthopraxy. You'll find doctrinal realities all throughout Scripture, but much addresses orthopraxy--how others lived in light of the Truth.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No doubt, the entirety of Scripture is profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction in Righteousness. I simply believe that the Epistles are highly didactic, thus, more evidently doctrinal--Orthodoxy. Obviously epistles deal with practice as well--orthopraxy. You'll find doctrinal realities all throughout Scripture, but much addresses orthopraxy--how others lived in light of the Truth.
The Epistles would be the doctrines and practices for the new Covenant!
 

Rippon2

Well-Known Member
All of the Bible was inspired to us, but not for us directly?
Your sub-standard English is difficult to understand.

What do you mean by "was inspired"? You put it in the past tense, as if it is no longer inspired.

I suppose you meant to say "is inspired." But "to us"? It is inspired, or as the NIV long has it "All Scripture is God-breathed." It's not a matter of us making it inspired.

And what do you mean by "but not for us directly"? You use strange and confusing language.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Your sub-standard English is difficult to understand.

What do you mean by "was inspired"? You put it in the past tense, as if it is no longer inspired.

I suppose you meant to say "is inspired." But "to us"? It is inspired, or as the NIV long has it "All Scripture is God-breathed." It's not a matter of us making it inspired.

And what do you mean by "but not for us directly"? You use strange and confusing language.
All of the 66 Canon Books have been inspired by the Holy Spirit, but to get our primary theology for the new Covenant, will find that in the NT Books, due to Progressive revelation!
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Gospels inform us of the person and mission of the Lord Jesus, but the doctrine that are built upon that foundation are foimd in the Epistles!
There is a small degree of truth in that, but you can find plenty of doctrine in the Gospels, and plenty about the person and work of our Lord in the Epistles.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
you can find plenty of doctrine in the Gospels

Agree, but being aware of this at the same time:

24 But he answered and said, I was not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Mt 15

As 'The Prophet' I'm not sure He had anything to say to non-Jews.
 
Top