Originally posted by Refreshed:
Just a note to point out an absurdity that everybody is probably aware of. Using the Flesch scale is accurate if all the words in the test case are "language-wide" without local phrases or obsolete words and does not accurately test between long periods of time because of the morphology of language.
that's right. i haven't got the software w me (AFTERNOTE: found it at
http://www.aellalei.com/resources/sample.html#flesch), but i think it wld be fun to run Jabberwocky thru it sometime, or some passage w short sentences fr a low-syllable language, maybe Pinyin Chinese!
take, for instance, the following paragraph:
"wode ming shi huang wenzhong. nihao, jintian tianqi buchuo. women chu qu you wan ba!"
i know many readers will feel blessed immediately, but i have to intrude--wld u believe it, this reads even EASIER for comprehension than the KJB1611--based on the Flesch-Kincaid!
if the KJB is Grade 4 level, the paragraph above is Grade 0.71999999.
or more pertinently, the following Bible passage:
'A ženi reče: "Trudnoći tvojoj muke ću umnožit, u mukama djecu ćeš rađati. Žudnja će te mužu tjerati, a on će gospodariti nad tobom."'
this Croatian Gen. 3:16 rates 3.708 on the same scale, again, beneath the reading level of the KJB.
i wonder what they wld think of next, those who argue for the KJB's readability on the basis of the Flesch-Kincaid formula despite the version's obvious archaicness of vocab n grammar.
P.S.--ah, more time for Jabberwocky--it rates 4.60138678935261 for Grade level, brillig duh!
[ April 28, 2003, 12:44 PM: Message edited by: Forever settled in heaven ]