glazer1972
Member
Pre-Tribulation Rapture is taught in our church. Many of our members hold to this belief.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Luke 17:34-37
34I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
35Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
36Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
37And they answered and said unto him, Where, Lord? And he said unto them, Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together.
Sounds pretty pre-trib to me ...:godisgood:
38For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 40Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
41Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
42Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
Wow, 1 and 2 Thessalonians are that recent?!?![]()
For someone to not believe in the rapture or be dispensational doesn't disqualifies them as Baptist as far as I'm concerned. It just disqualifies them as being a correct Baptist. Too much Calvinism has wormed its way into the church for my liking. If a person told me they were members of a Baptist church that held to Calvinism and did not hold to dispensational theology, I would be tempted to call them a liar.
oops.....
The ones who were taken.....were taken in judgement;
might need to re-think this one:thumbsup:
ummm where did you get 39 and so on..luke 17 only goes to verse 37..lol... i read it pretty clear..
27They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. 28Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded;
29But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all.
30Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.
31In that day, he which shall be upon the housetop, and his stuff in the house, let him not come down to take it away: and he that is in the field, let him likewise not return back.
32Remember Lot's wife.
33Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it.
34I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
35Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
36Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
37And they answered and said unto him, Where, Lord? And he said unto them, Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together.
also the 2nd thess verse i think webdog may be referring to might include this..
2 Thessalonians 2:7-12 (King James Version)
7For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Yes...you did read it clear,and are correct....in Luke...ummm where did you get 39 and so on..luke 17 only goes to verse 37..lol... i read it pretty clear..
13Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
14Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless.
Posted by Baptist Believer:
If you're talking about a pre-tribulation rapture of the church, that y belief has only been held (by some) for less than 200 years.
Just curious, where in I & II Thessalonians teach a pre-tribulation rapture? I can't find it in I Thess 4:13-18. It tells of a rapture, but not when.
I Thess 5 talks about the Day of the Lord coming as a thief in the night. I've always been taught that that is post-tribulational.
And in answer to the OP.. Yes, it is still held strongly or better is the largely predominant view among Baptists, and sees to be gaining some steam among Cals as well (qualifier - at least those I know and their discussions of others they know)And while I agree a pre-trib view is not 'necessary' from an exegetical standpoint, it is found in scripture.. and not just via 'indirect implication, and exegetical assumptions'. While I agree many of the passages can be seen this way, not all. Therefore, it can and is continued to be held quite strongly. Me personally, I hold to Pre-trib but I am not opposed to the Post-trib view either. I can see both in scripture. The whole Amil and Pret positions are another story. And lest we forget, Darby was NOT the first person to hold this view as it can be seen nearly 300 years earlier, though like Augustine and Calvin and Aminius, Darby was the one who popularized it.
I have posted this a time or two before so I'll do so again:
Long before Darby or Scofield.
Here are some examples of those who held and proclaimed a pre-trib view BEFORE 1830 (other than John Darby 1800-1882)
Joseph Mede (1586-1638);
Edward Bickersteth (1786-1850);
James H. Frere (1779-1866);
William Cuninghame (1775-1849); amoung various others.
Remember that the pre-trib is only slightly younger than the also new-on-scene, Covenant theology.
Hello Brother,
Yes...you did read it clear,and are correct....in Luke...
but if you look at the parallel passage in mt 24 you will see the verses I quoted for you!:thumbs:
mamac....I was also taught the pre-mill teaching first.I was taught that it was correct,and all others were wrong. Then I had a brother challenge me on this...looked into it ,and looked into some other ways Christians have understood the same verses
In luke it says,until the flood came and destroyed them all
In Mt24 it says,until the flood came and "took them away"
Do you see it? I was taught that the one taken was the rapture,and yet in mt 24 it is just the opposite. I had to search it out more.
Most of the puritans had a post mill understanding...many of the reformers were amill...
mamac.....all believers look for the blessed hope. We serve the Lord now, and diligently pursue Holiness now. We seek to win the lost with the truth of the perfect sacrifice of the cross.
As long as you believe in the return of the Lord....do not be afraid to look at the other views. Those christians who held those views were godly men also.
As with all truth...it belongs to God.There is only one truth ,and we all struggle to search it out. No one man has it here on earth, but even that is by God's design.
I can still teach the pre-mill view..accurately if I had to...but I do not believe it is the most accurate..
When I see others post some of the teaching, I wonder if anyone has questioned them as I was questioned years ago by another brother.
Be encouraged...we win in Jesus:thumbs: no matter which calendar of end-times we follow...but search it out...
I promise myself I'm going to stay out of these eschatology threads, but I get sucked in.
I am going to try to stay out of the discussion over how long the pre-trib view has been around. But webdog said the magic words when he cited I & II Thessalonians as sources of pre-trib passages. I can't resist asking where such passages are in those letters.
I know we're not arguing about the pre-trib view, just how long it's been around.. But I'm like Pavlov's dog. Touch the right button and I'm hooked.
oops.....
The ones who were taken.....were taken in judgement;
might need to re-think this one:thumbsup:
Here's my thoughts on this subject.....I believe in a pre-rapture tribulation. Whether or not you do is up to you. You want to stay here and suffer through the seals, bowls, and trumpets it's up to you. I plan on being at the marriage supper of the Lamb while you're down here suffering.
Oh, and for those whose churches don't teach Revelation, and all the surrounding events, times, scriptures....come to our church. We're doing a series right now on Revelation Revealed. It's verrrrrry interesting. Tomorrow's message is "A Word For Every Church."
You just made me laugh too when you said... I believe in a pre-rapture tribulation. I believe in a pre-rapture tribulation. I believe in a pre-rapture tribulation. I believe in a pre-rapture tribulation.
Why would it talk about leaving 1 while the other gets taken if we are all going to get wiped out together? It makes no sense
I have found this premill idea to be very defective.
Most of the puritans had a post mill understanding...many of the reformers were amill...