No.
1. Assumptions are behind all dating methods. There is no guarantee that something has not tampered the "clocks" of nature such as the Genesis flood.we must understand that all set dating methods have a set of assumptions. If we wish to remain scientific, in order to have an accurate dating method we must observe, check, and measure that dating method throughout time. For example, a scientist must necessarily observe and measure radioactive decay throughout time if he were to trust this method. Since the speed of light is the basis for radioactive decay we would need measurements to show that the speed has always been constant. Since man does not have this capacity, he should understand that that his dating methods contain assumptions, assumptions that he believes by faith.
I mean we could play that game too though if you want:
The earth's age, on the basis of it's helium formations (from the decay of radioactive elements supposedly operating over billions of years) is about 10,000 years. There is not enough Helium to support an earth 4.5 billion years old.
We could go back and forth with this all day but the point is all dating methods are based on assumptions.
2.I am opposed to how scientists interpret Geologic data in regards to the fossil record: The so-called historical geology has not changed or developed since days when it's basic philosophical structure was first worked out by such non geologists as Charles Lyell (a lawyer), William Smith (a surveyor), James Hutton (an agriculturalist), John Playfair (a Mathematician), George Cuvier (A comparative anatomist) and Charles Darwin (an apostate divinity student) and various theologians (Bruckland, Flemming, Pye Smith, and Sedgewick). Please not that historical geology and the geologic timetable are the philosophical products of ten men who were not geologists.
In fact there is no place on earth that all the "time periods" are observed in the order they appear on the geologic time table. For example the Grand Canyon, which contains the most exposed strata in the world, has 8 period missing (Supposedly 345 million years missing).
Man has never observed the rock formation that the timetable proposes and this time table exists only in textbooks and in the minds of men.
The "scientists" who arranged the "time periods" did so in ascending order because they assumed all life evolved from simple to more complex.
On June 1, 1968 William Meister of Kearns, Utah found a human sandal print with a squashed trilobite in the heel, He was looking for fossils in the "Cambrian Wheeler shale formations, a formation supposedly 600 million years old. Dr. H.H. Doelling of Utah's Geological Survey verified that it was not a fake. Here we have an intelligent man able to make shoes, crushing a trilobite in a soft "Cambrian" rock layer.
The Cambrian explosion is a myth.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
1Ti_6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: