In that HOw each side regards the effects from the fall...
cals tend to see it TOTALLY affecting mankind, as it gave us inherited original Sin, that we All have a fallen sinful nature, and that we are simply unable to respond to the Gospel by ourselves, as our sin nature and spiritual "deadness' means God HAS to directly intervene on our behalf to save us...
They see the image of God now corrupted beyond point of repair, so to speak...
Arms tend to see it as though we have been marred by fall, NOT affected us so much that we cannot respond in earnest to the Gospel... God allowed us free will to love and accept/reject Him, and that still remains even in flawed/marred mankimnd after fall.
So they still are able to respond as the will was NOT destroyed by fall, or even depravied, but more like was marred/restricted...
So is HOW we view the extent/result of the Fall depend where we tend to fall on Cal/Arm side?
cals tend to see it TOTALLY affecting mankind, as it gave us inherited original Sin, that we All have a fallen sinful nature, and that we are simply unable to respond to the Gospel by ourselves, as our sin nature and spiritual "deadness' means God HAS to directly intervene on our behalf to save us...
They see the image of God now corrupted beyond point of repair, so to speak...
Arms tend to see it as though we have been marred by fall, NOT affected us so much that we cannot respond in earnest to the Gospel... God allowed us free will to love and accept/reject Him, and that still remains even in flawed/marred mankimnd after fall.
So they still are able to respond as the will was NOT destroyed by fall, or even depravied, but more like was marred/restricted...
So is HOW we view the extent/result of the Fall depend where we tend to fall on Cal/Arm side?
Last edited by a moderator: