They believe in Baptismal Regeneration yet affirm the essentials of the faith. Does this one variance make them a cult?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
GRACE: I want to go to pastor Tom Rukala, joining us tonight, a special guest, a Baptist minister. I`ve been researching the Church of Christ. I don`t know that much about it. What can you tell me?
PASTOR TOM RUKALA, BAPTIST PASTOR: Well, the Church of Christ is a relatively new church. It was started about 150 years ago by Alexander Campbell. And it`s, unfortunately, a very legalistic sect, and they tend to use methods of intimidation and pressure tactics. They claim that they are the only ones going to heaven, and all other people are condemned to hell. So in case...
GRACE: Uh-oh, I`m in trouble. But I already knew that.
(LAUGHTER)
GRACE: Now, wait a minute. What more can you tell me?
RUKALA: Well, they claim that if you`re not baptized by one of their ministers, that you`re doomed to hell, even if you`re a believer in Jesus Christ, which, of course, breaks completely from the traditional Christian view that all those who call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ will be saved because we`re saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, who died for our sins and rose again. For the Church of Christ folks, that`s not enough. You have to be a member of their narrow sect. It`s a very exclusive group. And if you`re not a member of their sect, you`re condemned.
GRACE: You know, Pastor, you keep saying "sect." "Sect." You make it sound like a cult.
RUKALA: It kind of is a borderline cult, unfortunately. I don`t want to make it out to be some kind of Hare Krishna group, but it has cult-like characteristics and...
GRACE: In what sense?
RUKALA: Well, in the sense of the exclusivism, the attitude that they are the only ones who know the truth. The tactics that they use are sometimes just -- not only un-biblical but unethical, and they can be very ungracious, unfortunately.
They believe in Baptismal Regeneration
YOU believe "SAVED" means 'regenerated', right?:
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that disbelieveth shall be condemned. Mk 16
If "SAVED" means 'bound for heaven' then please splain to me where they're wrong.
YOU believe "SAVED" means 'regenerated', right?:
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that disbelieveth shall be condemned. Mk 16
If "SAVED" means 'bound for heaven' then please splain to me where they're wrong.
Eph 2:8-10
I don't think that the question is regeneration here, but whether or not water baptism is the mode by which our sins are washed away. And for most of the CoC, you are only "saved" if you were dunked under the water by a CoC elder. In other words, if you were not physically submerged in water by an authorized minister then you have not been regenerated.8 for by grace have ye been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
9 not of works, that no man should glory.
10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God afore pprepared that we should walk in them. Eph 2
This means nothing. It's open to interpretation. You didn't address what 'SAVED' means.
Does 'saved' mean 'regenerated'? Is the passage stating that faith regenerates us?
FYI, scripture indicates that only the 'regenerate' can be 'saved'.
8 for by grace have ye been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
9 not of works, that no man should glory.
10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God afore pprepared that we should walk in them. Eph 2
This means nothing. It's open to interpretation. You didn't address what 'SAVED' means.
Does 'saved' mean 'regenerated'? Is the passage stating that faith regenerates us?
FYI, scripture indicates that only the 'regenerate' can be 'saved'.
...if you were not physically submerged in water by an authorized minister then you have not been regenerated.
Unbelief is what damns, not being unbaptized.. Notice the second part of that verse..He that believeth and is baptized is saved... as is he that believeth and is not baptized.YOU believe "SAVED" means 'regenerated', right?:
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that disbelieveth shall be condemned. Mk 16
If "SAVED" means 'bound for heaven' then please splain to me where they're wrong.
I don't think an authorized minister is required.just wanted throw in my 2 cents here - where does Scripture REQUIRE an authorized minister.
I realize that our Baptist tradition is that the pastor does the baptizing - but there have times when a person other than pastor preformed the ordinance.
There are many things about some of the smaller (and older) CoC churches in my area that I would consider false doctrine. What prevents them from being "Baptist" is their view that God uses water baptism in saving men by His grace. What you have to decide is what false doctrine actually causes them not to believe the true gospel.It depends on how you define cult, I would definately classify them as a false religion.
They ascribe to Baptism what only Faith in the shed blood of Christ can do; wash sins away.
It's a false religion straight from the pits of hell.
It depends on how you define cult, I would definately classify them as a false religion.
They ascribe to Baptism what only Faith in the shed blood of Christ can do; wash sins away.
It's a false religion straight from the pits of hell.
I think it best not to look for doctrines that "damn" (they do not infact condemn but instead they reflect an already condemned state) but look for the doctrines that save. Do they hold fast to the gospel of Jesus Christ?Yes and I am trying to figure that out for myself. I know that the United Church of Christ is from Hell but not sure on this one. They hold to false doctrine yes but does it damn not sure yet. KJVOnlyism is false doctrine but I never write up those churches because they affirm the essentials.
I am trying to dialogue more with them to see really what they believe. If it does turn out they are false what type of tract should I mail them?
I have tracts designed for apostates, tracts on Hell, tracts on the moral law, and tracts on the blood of Christ.
I think it best not to look for doctrines that "damn" (they do not infact condemn but instead they reflect an already condemned state) but look for the doctrines that save. Do they hold fast to the gospel of Jesus Christ?
If so, then no amount of error can rip them from His grasp. If not, then no amount of correct theology can save them.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G530A using Tapatalk
I think it best not to look for doctrines that "damn" (they do not infact condemn but instead they reflect an already condemned state) but look for the doctrines that save. Do they hold fast to the gospel of Jesus Christ?
If so, then no amount of error can rip them from His grasp. If not, then no amount of correct theology can save them.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G530A using Tapatalk