Zaac
Well-Known Member
Hi folks, I haven't been here for a long as another forum and fighting the final stage of MS has kept me busy.
The Death Penalty is a much disputed and seldom addressed from the whole of scripture. To get anywhere with the issue there are points that must be taken into consideration and must, in any good Bible Study, never be ignored.
The Bible, our Christian versions, is of a single context, all the way from "In the beginning..." through the very last verse of The Revelation of Jesus 22. And from this knowledge shown to me through my twenty-six years of study by the Holy Spirit during my private Time with God comes my First Rule of Hermeneutics; No scripture, collection of scriptures nor any passage of scriptures can ever be clearly understood without the light of all other scripture shinning on it/them.
Since I have been away for years let me explain further the basis for my opinion here. There are two components of a Christian Bible, the Bible and the only God ordained, God breathed or inspired twenty-seven Commentaries giving us Life Application of the Bible that Jesus wrote and taught from, the first sixty-six books or the Old Testament.
Hey Bill. Glad you're back with us. Will be praying for your health issues.
I think I'm kind of confused here. You say the "first" sixty-six books as though you believe there are additional books that should be included in the Bible. Can you clarify? Thanks.
Now, today we have a tool that never is mistaken, DNA Testing and it is conclusive proof of guilt or innocence. In the Ten Commandments, written by the very finger of the Son of God before His incarnation into the body of the human, Jesus (John 1:1-3), we are given, Thou shalt not murder. Then in genesis 9:6 we find the son of God commanding us that if a man sheds the blood of another man, we are to kill him.
I believe , again, when you take the Bible as a whole and allow it to hold it's integrity from start to finish, that Gen. 9:6 was for that pre-Christ time frame and to those people.
We can't very well take the whole of Scripture into account and reconcile the command to love our neighbor as ourselves, or how we are to forgive many times over, or how we are ALL guilty of breaking EVERY commandment if we break one, if we purport that we still have the right to kill those who have killed another.
The whole of Scripture simply does not support that.
The law didn't go away. But it was completed and The Cross showed us why doing the cultural things that the Israelites did to keep themselves set apart from the heathen cultures around them AREN'T what would set us apart post-Cross.
Post cross, it is the love of Jesus and HIS Holiness that should set us apart.
It is the love of Jesus that extends mercy when anyone wants to take the life of another for any reason.
It is the love of Jesus that says forgive that person no matter how many time they have wronged you.
It is the love of Jesus that says I'm going to help the widows, the poor, and the orphaned.
It is the love of Jesus and what HE did on the Cross for all who would be saved that should compel us to ALWAYS show the same kind of grace and mercy when it comes to advocating life for EVERY situation, not just with the unborn.
I often tell people that it's really easy to know when an understanding is or is not of God.
An understanding that IS of God is NOT going to author confusion by contradicting another understanding or action of God. The only time it does, is when men's opinions have entered into the understanding.
There's simply no way, IMO, to look at The Cross and see any situation where Christ would expect His followers to do anything but show grace and mercy for the lives of those whom a worldly government gives the okay to kill.