-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Is the denial of imputed guilt essential in the "traditional statement"
- Thread starter jonathanD
- Start date
Tempest in a tea pot. A tiny, tiny SBC tea pot.
quantumfaith
Active Member
Would either of you gentlemen please explain for us less informed and knowledgeable? It would be appreciated. BTW, jonathan, the use of "faction" is a bit acrimonious ....don't you thinK? Perhaps that was your intent. The "non-cal" part of the SBC is not by any measure small or of necessity dissenting.
Last edited by a moderator:
Baptist Puritan
New Member
denial of imputed guilt
From my understanding of the denial of imputed guilt, this doctrine is essential to their doctrine of the age of accountability. This doctrine is totally unscriptural and spiritually damaging, not only for individuals, but also for the local church. This is a newer doctrine within the SBC since historically the SBC was founded by men who held to the doctrines of grace.
From my understanding of the denial of imputed guilt, this doctrine is essential to their doctrine of the age of accountability. This doctrine is totally unscriptural and spiritually damaging, not only for individuals, but also for the local church. This is a newer doctrine within the SBC since historically the SBC was founded by men who held to the doctrines of grace.
None of this is true. imputed guilt has nothing to do with any age of accountability. And the SBC was founded equally by folks on both sides.
Is that Original sin being denied?
And doesn't paul link together the view that God imputed spiritual death to us thru Adam fall, yet imputes eternal life to all found in Christ?
quantumfaith
Active Member
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup: