I did a google search and found this from Charles Hodge: Systematic Theology volume 2
§ 13. Original Sin.
The effects of Adam’s sin upon his posterity are declared in our standards to be,
(1.) The guilt of his first sin.
(2.) The loss of original righteousness.
(3.) The corruption of our whole nature, which (i.e., which corruption), is commonly called original sin. Commonly, but not always. Not unfrequently by original sin is meant all the subjective evil consequences of the apostasy of our first parent, and it therefore includes all three of the particulars just mentioned. The National Synod of France, therefore, condemned the doctrine of Placæus, because he made original sin to consist of inherent, hereditary depravity, to the exclusion of the guilt of Adam’s first sin.
This inherent corruption in which all men since the fall are born, is properly called original sin,
(1.) Because it is truly of the nature of sin.
(2.) Because it flows from our first parents as the origin of our race.
(3.) Because it is the origin of all other sins; and
(4.) Because it is in its nature distinguished from actual sins.
Then a quote from the forum of Concord;
(1.) That this corruption of nature affects the whole soul.
(2.) That it consists in the loss or absence of original righteousness, and consequent entire moral depravity of our nature, including or manifesting itself in an aversion from all spiritual good, or from God, and an inclination to all evil.
(3.) That it is truly and properly of the nature of sin, involving both guilt and pollution.
(4.) That it retains its character as sin even in the regenerated.
(5.) That it renders the soul spiritually dead, so that the natural, or unrenewed man, is entirely unable of himself to do anything good in the sight of God.
This doctrine therefore stands opposed, —
1. To that which teaches that the race of man is uninjured by the fall of Adam.
2. To that which teaches that the evils consequent on the fall are merely physical.
3. To the doctrine which makes original sin entirely negative, consisting in the want of original righteousness.
4. To the doctrine which admits a hereditary depravity of nature, and makes it consist in an inclination to sin, but denies that it is itself sinful.
5. The fifth form of doctrine to which the Protestant faith stands opposed, is that which admits a moral deterioration of our nature, which deserves the displeasure of God, and which is therefore truly sin, and yet denies that the evil is so great as to amount to spiritual death, and to involve the entire inability of the natural man to what is spiritually good.
6. And the doctrine of the Protestant churches is opposed to the teachings of those who deny that original sin affects the whole man, and assert that it has its seat exclusively in the affections or the heart, while the understanding and reason are uninjured or uninfluenced.
