1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is the "Version" issue really that Important?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Dr. Bob, May 25, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 3 of 8
  1. Trotter

    Trotter <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,818
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Actually, I can do it with any bible translation I own... and I own quite a few different translations.

    My faith in in the Author, not the translators. I learn which is good and which is inferior by actually reading and using a translation... not taking some crakpots' opinions about them.

    If I were going to take another's opinion, it would be from someone who was at least reputable.
     
    #41 Trotter, Jun 10, 2006
  2. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen Brother Trotter -- Preach it! :thumbs:
     
    #42 Ed Edwards, Jun 10, 2006
  3. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,389
    Likes Received:
    551
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Roby - if only 4 HAD it in but they were the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, et al, then THEY would be evil and terrible, and could not be trusted. But if 4 out of 5500 OTHERS have it and some SDA sources agree, well bingo, the "AV is right and all others false" malarkey.

    One cannot debate with someone who believes a position by faith without one shred of evidence and not ONE verse (in ANY translation!) They will not learn.

    So best to ignore such "trolls" and figure they are "willingly ignorant" and go about discussing in an intelligent manner with many who hold to the priority of the KJV without going to such an extreme.
     
    #43 Dr. Bob, Jun 10, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 10, 2006
  4. william s. correa

    william s. correa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    Crack pipe?

    Well I dind"t studder "My faith in in the Author",when I said "The AV 1611 Is the Inerrant ,infallible ,Word of God"
     
    #44 william s. correa, Jun 10, 2006
  5. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure it is

    If you ignore all questions on the subject!
     
    #45 DesiderioDomini, Jun 11, 2006
  6. Anti-Alexandrian

    Anti-Alexandrian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    764
    Likes Received:
    0
    So where is "scripture"(chapter and verse;any translation will do) to support the Alexandrian position?
     
    #46 Anti-Alexandrian, Jun 11, 2006
  7. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    2Ti 3:16-17 (KJV1611 Edition):
    All Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God, & is profitable
    for doctrine, for reproofe, for correction,
    for instrution in righteousnesse,
    17 That the man of God may be perfect,
    throughly furnished vnto all good workes.
     
    #47 Ed Edwards, Jun 11, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 11, 2006
  8. IronWill

    IronWill New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    As soon as you show me verses that say the King James or Textus Receptus is the Bible, I'll show you verses that show you my version of choice or underlying texts are the Bible.
     
    #48 IronWill, Jun 11, 2006
  9. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    All Scripture on this verses refers to the WORDS in the autographs -- Hebrew, Greek and little Aramiac.
     
    #49 Askjo, Jun 11, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 11, 2006
  10. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please provide your proof reflecting to the bold of your quotation above.
     
    #50 Askjo, Jun 11, 2006
  11. IronWill

    IronWill New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    You do the first part, at which point I will do the latter.
     
    #51 IronWill, Jun 11, 2006
  12. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    All Scripture on this verses refers to the WORDS in the autographs -- Hebrew, Greek
    and little Aramiac; the WORDS in the original language copies;
    the WORDS in faithful translations.

    In fact, that shouldn't be hard for an omniPOTENT God to have more than
    one set of WORDS that express His WORD.
     
    #52 Ed Edwards, Jun 11, 2006
  13. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    You relpied to Anti-Alexandrian, not me. Come on, please provide your proof.
     
    #53 Askjo, Jun 11, 2006
  14. IronWill

    IronWill New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, not playing. If you post your verses about the KJVO position, I'll post mine about my position.
     
    #54 IronWill, Jun 11, 2006
  15. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,389
    Likes Received:
    551
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Iron, they have no proof so MUST attack you. Don't play the silly game of that sect.

    NO TRANSLATION is proven in any Scripture or any translation of Scripture to be "perfect". Why? IT IS THE WORK OF MAN. And if man can do a "perfect" work, we don't need God.

    Remember, those claiming such perfection for only one English translation (don't know which revision - they can't get their act together on that) are moving BEYOND what God preserved/promised!

    Or they are claiming a second work of inspiration. Ugh. Talk about heresy.
     
    #55 Dr. Bob, Jun 11, 2006
  16. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, I will not answer it until you provide your proof because you asked Anti-Alexandrian for it, but I asked YOU, not Anti-Alexandrian, for proof. If you refuse to answer it, then I will not answer it.
     
    #56 Askjo, Jun 11, 2006
  17. Anti-Alexandrian

    Anti-Alexandrian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    764
    Likes Received:
    0
    They answer a question with a question;how original!
    They do so because they cannot give a honest answer.
     
    #57 Anti-Alexandrian, Jun 11, 2006
  18. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Come on fellas - lets quit the "if you don't tell me I won't tell you" game.

    Leave it please and get back on topic.
     
    #58 NaasPreacher (C4K), Jun 11, 2006
  19. IronWill

    IronWill New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ah, hold on now, I believe that ad hominem attacks are forbidden here. Let's stick to the issue please. What scripture defends the KJV-Only position?
     
    #59 IronWill, Jun 11, 2006
  20. Anti-Alexandrian

    Anti-Alexandrian Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    764
    Likes Received:
    0
    No attacks,just stating the obvious.

    There IS no scripture to support that.
     
    #60 Anti-Alexandrian, Jun 11, 2006
Page 3 of 8
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...