manchester
New Member
Is it okay to state that the NWT is not the Word of God? Is it okay to say ANY translation is not the Word of God, except for the KJV?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You falsely answered here. That is misleading and mis-information! Not 11 MSS! 5210 MSS (99%) of 5255 MSS favored the KJV; 45 MSS (1%) of 5255 MSS favored these MVs. I researched on the textual criticism for about 15 yrs. I found the evidences disagreeing with your false comments above. I examined the Scriptures and found the factual documents saying the KJV is right and MVs are wrong.Originally posted by gb93433:
With only about 11 manuscripts when the KJV was translated and over 5000 when the NIV was translated it seems kind of strange that the KJV could make a better decision at the time with 11 than later with over 5000.
The NWT followed the W-H text; MVs followed the W-H text. Are they the Word of God? That is serious question because we know the NWT is the cult bible.Originally posted by manchester:
Is it okay to state that the NWT is not the Word of God? Is it okay to say ANY translation is not the Word of God, except for the KJV?
The NWT followed the W-H text; MVs followed the W-H text. Are they the Word of God? That is serious question because we know the NWT is the cult bible. </font>[/QUOTE]You know that is not the truth. Just look at Jn 1:1.Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by manchester:
Is it okay to state that the NWT is not the Word of God? Is it okay to say ANY translation is not the Word of God, except for the KJV?
You falsely answered here. That is misleading and mis-information! Not 11 MSS! 5210 MSS (99%) of 5255 MSS favored the KJV; 45 MSS (1%) of 5255 MSS favored these MVs. I researched on the textual criticism for about 15 yrs. I found the evidences disagreeing with your false comments above. I examined the Scriptures and found the factual documents saying the KJV is right and MVs are wrong. </font>[/QUOTE]So you are saying that they had over 5000 manuscripts available when they translated the KJV in 1611? If they did why did they go back into the Vulgate?Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by gb93433:
With only about 11 manuscripts when the KJV was translated and over 5000 when the NIV was translated it seems kind of strange that the KJV could make a better decision at the time with 11 than later with over 5000.
You falsely answered here. That is misleading and mis-information! Not 11 MSS! 5210 MSS (99%) of 5255 MSS favored the KJV; 45 MSS (1%) of 5255 MSS favored these MVs. I researched on the textual criticism for about 15 yrs. I found the evidences disagreeing with your false comments above. I examined the Scriptures and found the factual documents saying the KJV is right and MVs are wrong. </font>[/QUOTE]You must be an incredible textual critic to be able to date the manuscripts you saw personally and critique them for internal and external evidence classifying them. You must know Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic and Latin quite well. Where did you learn such things? Where is your name on some of the work you have done. I would like to take a look at it. You sound a lot like W.F. Albright.Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by gb93433:
With only about 11 manuscripts when the KJV was translated and over 5000 when the NIV was translated it seems kind of strange that the KJV could make a better decision at the time with 11 than later with over 5000.
I agree with you, DeafPosttrib.Originally posted by DeafPosttrib:
Three books that I do not recommend them to read: JW's 'New World Translation', Book of Mormon, and Koran too.
You are WRONG! DeafPosttrib, modern versions affected any doctrines of the Bible. They omitted IMPORTANT names of our Lord Jesus Christ in the New Testament alone 200 times!NIV, Living Bible, New English Version, Today's English Version, etc... do have doctrines same as in KJV. There is no difference between any Versions with KJV, all have same doctrines.
Absolutely yes, please understand that preacher preaches or teaches the doctrines by using their MVs slightly. Be careful when you listen what they preach/teach by using modern versions dues to wrong purpose. At the deaf church where I visited, I listened with my KJV to a deaf preacher preaching by using different Bible version. He used "verse with verse" (expository preaching) introducting to what he preached. I looked up the KJV and found one verse comparing to other verse in the KJV, but this deaf preacher used the NIV (I think, but I am not sure). I noticed what he said according to the verses in NIV. The NIV agreed with his preaching, but the KJV disagreed with his preaching. See the difference between NIV and KJV.Understand, all of these are 'Christianity' Bibles mentioned about Jesus Christ, Calvary, resurrection, salvation, second coming, judgment day, etc.
I have interesting information about JW bible. I learn the JW bible is similar to NIV. I compared list of many verses between the JW bible and NIV and found 50 verses according to the information, but I think more than 50 verses. Compare the similarity between JW and NIV because JW bible followed the W-H text and NIV followed the W-H text.JW's New World Translation take too many important verses away.
I agree with you!I do use KJV all the times, because it is more close to Greek than any versions,
No, look up my answer above.all versions have same doctrines as KJV have.
Ok, I do have several different versions in my library. Let's look in New International Version on Romans 10:9, it says, "That if you confess with your moth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." Is there a big difference between NIV and KJV on Romans 10:9? Does, NIV deny that Jesus Christ is the Lord?modern versions affected any doctrines of the Bible. They omitted IMPORTANT names of our Lord Jesus Christ in the New testament alone 200 times!
I agree with you, but don't get too horrified. Did you share with your Bible teacher what you just shared with us? If not, then you do not love that person enough to correct him. We are neither part of the problem nor part of the solution so that is gossip as well.You did not ask for advive but rather complianed and expreseed your opinion. All we have to do is to take the log out of our own eye first. Then we have reason to judge. The truth is that we must examine ourselves and judge ourselves rightly first. Everyone of us are at different points on the path God has given us. That is the reason why we need the body.Originally posted by michelle:
--------------------------------------------------
Good points michelle.
--------------------------------------------------
Thanks KJVThumper! I was horrified last Sunday, when my Bible class teacher tried to separate truth and love, by saying we need to find the "balance" between them. The problem with this belief and teaching, is that one cannot be separated from the other. If Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life, and the words of God are the truth, and God is love, and Jesus Christ is God, then the two go together, not separately, and do not need to be balanced out. This seemed to me, to be teaching how to compromise and that we should compromise.
Love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle