Originally posted by Plain ol' Ralph:
Your demeanor is what is ungodly,
Please cite examples.
The most contentious things I said was that you weren't honest enough to look at cross references in the KJV then acknowledge different wording and that you were employing double standards. Both of these are true statements. You still have not dealt with the fact that in the parallel passages I cited, the KJV attributes two different phrases to Jesus.
When MV's supposedly leave something out or change something, you rant and rave. When the same standard is applied to the KJV you attempt evasion and start in with personal attacks.
it is due to your utter confusion to what is stated by Scripture.
Peter is NOT satan, as you would have it read, he was putting the influence of satan before the will of God for Jesus to go to Calvary.
That is a false charge. I am not utterly confused about what is stated by Scripture. In fact, I quoted the KJV verbatim.
Do I think Peter was Satan? Absolutely not. But the passage doesn't say that Jesus was addressing Satan directly. It says that He was addressing Peter directly.
I think the statement was two-pronged. One, He was convicting Peter of allowing Satan to use him and for his attempt at rebuking Jesus. Two, He
was indirectly rebuking Satan.
I find you judging my character as offensive as you're insinuating me to be. If the shoe fits, sir, WEAR IT!
I am not judging your character. I am judging the behavior you have demonstrated in numerous posts on this board.
BTW, the shoe does not fit. You are in no position to make blanket statements about my spirituality or discernment. I make no claims to perfection. I am still learning. But I am not a novice.
The two attacks you have made against my understanding demonstrate that you are willing to falsely accuse me in order to avoid dealing with the truth.
But then again, that is the norm for the newer version advo's,
The KJV is my primary Bible and the one we use at church. Once again you have made a sweeping statement from a position of ignorance.
you tell them the truth, they backlash with derogatory remarks,
You're joking right? I am trying to get you to deal with facts truthfully. It is you that have avoided the facts and instead attacked my sprituality and discernment.
I have only confronted you with the two facts I know about you. One, that you are wrong on the issue of versions. Two, that you have a habit of attacking people personally when they say something you don't like but can't refute in a factual way. This is not Christlike on your part nor does it indicate a love for the truth.
guess it's because when you throw a rock in a pack of dogs, the one you hit yelps the LOUDEST!
Why would a Christian want to through rocks at other Christians? You have made a good analogy though. You would rather cast stones than "reason together".
Hmmmm....somethings not right here with your story. 
