Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
No you just don't get it.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Is This Right or Wrong?
- Thread starter SavedByGrace
- Start date
- Status
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Enlighten me
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
That seems unlikely to happen.
The problem seems to be that you don’t believe in self-defense of any kind.
Have you followed the trial at all, or only read such biased reports?
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
The things that I listed all have killed people. If we should make everything safe then we should do away with all of those items so we can save just one life.
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
You are avoiding the main point of a 17 year old kid being allowed to own weapons that are used to murder
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
That isn't the main point though, is it? Since I am the one that initiated this branch of the conversation I decide what the main point is and the gun wasn't it. Not to mention I have already said it is fine for a 17 year old to own a rifle. I am fine with a 12 year old owning a rifle.
Who has the personal accountability, the loaded gun, or the person choosing to shoot it?
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Yeah free.Wow you Americans are so different from the rest of the world
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Last edited by a moderator:
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
I would still like to know if saving every life counts why do we not get rid of knives, baseball bats, forks, cars, planes, gasoline, etc... @SavedByGrace
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
Or choking on your food might kill you! Your reasoning is moot
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Right we should ban food too.
SavedByGrace
Well-Known Member
you just cannot admit that it is WRONG to have "rights" for 17 year olds, and as you say, 12 year olds, to use guns! The US Constitution is NUTS on this!
Was it actually murder - or was it self-defense
and as far as 17 years old - we have 17 years old in the Army/USMC
and though not authorized -
Many youngsters age 12 and Up served in WW II
Youngest Enlisted Men : 15 & 16 year old Soldiers
The Underage Military Service - had over 1,000 members (16 & under)
and over 10,000 17 year olds join the US military every year
(must have parents permission)
"As of 2020 approximately one-quarter of enlistees to the Regular British Army were aged under 18.[211"
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
I don't admit that because it is not true. Please spell out how exactly it is wrong for a 17 year old to use guns? Good luck.
SavedByGrace said: ↑
This is very serious. How can it ever be justified for a 17 year old kid to own a weapon to murder?
He did not own it. He borrowed it. For his protection while trying to see what the idiots on the left were doing to his community. The perps (not him) were trying to steal it from him. He did not murder anyone. You are part of the problem, convicting him without merit. Is that how it works where you live?
#69Wingman68, Today at 9:34 AM
Talking with people who don’t listen is a waste of time.
Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Guns are used for legitimate reasons FAR more than they are used for murder.
What was the purpose of the cities of refuge?
- Status