Is this the truth about SBC leadership?

I certainly would not call the SBC the same as it was 100 years ago. The leaders today are hiring graduates from DTS and Pat Robertson's university to teach in SBC seminaries. They have board members who are from outside of the SBC. That would have been unheard of just a few years ago.

To have a man being nominated as president of the SBC whose church gives less than 1/2 of one percent to the CP clearly shows a lack of cooperation with the very same entity he claims to support by the idea of running for the president of an organization where the CP sets it apart from others. Doesn't that kind of practice say something to anyone about the heart issue of a church?