Is your Bible Inerrant?

[Jim Ward]

Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jim Ward:
Why do you mv lovers have such a hard time with simple math?

Why do you KJBOs have such a
problem with even simple English?

My dictionary says:
Bible 1. the collection of
sacred writings of the Christian religion

I have ONE COLLECTION,
it currently has about 20 Bibles
in it: individual collections.
Well, one book actually has 4 Bibles
in it

</font>[/QUOTE]

Typical avoidance of the question reply. Every time a Bible dis-believer gets exposed with a question theyrespond with another question and do not attempt to answer the question asked of them.

Of course we all know that Ed is not a Bible believer but a bibles "believer".

Thanks for the

this morning Ed, it is very much appreciated.


Jim

 

[Jim Ward]

Michelle, you said: "You are making the claim, now you prove it!"


All I can say is don't hold your breath waiting for the proof.


Jim

 

[Ed Edwards]

I don't believe in the Bible, I believe
in the Jesus of the Bible.

The reason it seems i don't answer questions
is that some don't understand my answer.
Consider the question:

Why do you mv lovers have such a hard time with simple math?

1. Arithemetic is a subset of mathematics.
Arithemetic is simple math. Most people
do not know this or forget it is true
when they use "math" in their conversation.

2. Most people on this board seem to forget
that there are two "Word of God":

A. the written Word of God: the Bible
B. the living Word of God: Messiah Iesus

There is one and only one living Word
of God: Christ Jesus. (though Messiah
Yeshua has many names and titles)
There are many written "Word of God"s
in many Languages and many in English.

 

[Ed Edwards]

Yes, my Bible is inerrant, it is
a 21st Century King James Version (KJ21).

 

[robycop3]

Michelle, the argument isn't against Erasmus the man. He's long-dead and has no effect upon the present world. But his WORK remains.

Now, God could've used Cesare Borgia to have collated the Greek mss had He so chosen, so the "who" isn't so important. However, the "what" is. Skanwmatos reminded us that Erasmus revised the TR FIVE times, and that after him, Stephanus and then Beza each revised it. Here's a URL to the history of the TR:

http://www.bibletexts.com/terms/tr-history.htm

 

[Ed Edwards]

Yes, my Bible is inerrant,
it is a CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH VERSION !

 

[Ed Edwards]

Yes, My Bible is inerrant cause it
is a King James Version, 1769 edition
(KJV1769)

Or is it a 1762? I don't know how to tell

 

[Ed Edwards]

New Voter, New Voter!!!!
voter #81 alert.

Yet another vote with the majority:

3 The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 46% (37)

 

[Ed Edwards]

Yes, my Bible is inerrant.
I have a freshly pressed copy of
the Holman Christian Standard
Bible (HCSB) (Holman, 2004).

ILn the new testament it has quotes from
the Old Testament bolded

 

[Ed Edwards]

Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
Yes, my Bible is inerrant.
I have a freshly pressed copy of
the Holman Christian Standard
Bible (HCSB) (Holman, 2004).

In the new testament it has quotes from
the Old Testament bolded

Item corrected for spelling.

 

[Ed Edwards]

An 82ed person has voted!
I need to visit my MIL today.
She was 92 on Monday.

 

[Ed Edwards]

Spring forward

 

[Ed Edwards]

SF = spring forward

 

[Phillip]

Originally posted by Jim Ward:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jim Ward:
Why do you mv lovers have such a hard time with simple math?

Why do you KJBOs have such a
problem with even simple English?

My dictionary says:
Bible 1. the collection of
sacred writings of the Christian religion

I have ONE COLLECTION,
it currently has about 20 Bibles
in it: individual collections.
Well, one book actually has 4 Bibles
in it

</font>[/QUOTE]

Typical avoidance of the question reply. Every time a Bible dis-believer gets exposed with a question theyrespond with another question and do not attempt to answer the question asked of them.

Of course we all know that Ed is not a Bible believer but a bibles "believer".

Thanks for the

this morning Ed, it is very much appreciated.


Jim </font>[/QUOTE]Uh, scuse me Jim but your answer to my questions was just as bad, if not more potent. Remember telling me that when I quit playing around you might start answering. I never heard you specifically answer the questions in my string. It has become obvious that maybe you have no answers?

All we got was a very long testimony about how you became a KJVo with a lack of accurate scripture reference.

 

[Ed Edwards]

My Bible: the New Living Translation (NLT)
is still inerrant!

 

[Ed Edwards]

Some 83rd person has voted! Yea! & thank you.

 

[Phillip]

Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
Somebody vote before everybody figures
out I voted "10 The Bible is inerrant
in all English translations"

I don't have time to read all 200 pages here

I think it is difficult to answer your questions because there are more than one correct answer. I assume, by this, the most accurate answer should be the one selected (do you work at Tinker--I can tell a government question when I see it.

)

Anyway, I voted that the originals were inerrant, but I also believe that the doctrine, science and history is inerrant. I can't go as far as to say ALL English Bibles are inerrant, then we have to consider the Catholic and JW translations (of which the Catholic contain the apocrypha). We do know that the original autographs were inerrant, so therefore, to me that is the "most" correct answer.

 

[Ed Edwards]

Next time i'll try to remember to put:
"vote for the highest number with which you
can fully agree."

 

[Ed Edwards]

There are now 85 votes.
Thank you for your vote.

The 5 newest votes are shown in the left margin.
The total votes for each category is shown
at the right end of the line (which do to wrap around
may be at the left also?).

Poll Results: Is your Bible Inerrant? (85 votes.)
Is your Bible Inerrant?
Choose 1

== - -3 the Bible has many major errors and is invalid 0% (0)
== - -2 the Bible has major errors so is only marginally useful 1% (1)
+1 - -1 the Bible has minor errors and should be used with caution 1% (1)
+1 - 0 the Bible has minor errors but is still useful 6% (5)
== - 1 The Bible is inerrant on all doctrinal issues 11% (9)
+1 - 2 The Bible is inerrant on all issues: doctrinal, historic, and scientific 11% (9)
+2 - 3 The Bible is inerrant in the original autographs 45% (38)
== - 4 The Bible is inerrant only in the Textus Receptus (TR) 4% (3)
== - 5 The Bible is inerrant only in the KJV 1611 (exclusive of translator notes) 5% (4)
== - 6. The Bible is inerrant only in the KJV 1611 (including the translator notes) 2% (2)
== - 7 The Bible is inerrant only in the KJB1769 and/or KJB1873 1% (1)
== - 8 inerrant in any English translation based on the TR 4% (3)
== - 9 inerrant in any English translation translated by dynamic equivalence 1% (1)
== - 10 The Bible is inerrant in all English translations 9% (8)
== - 11 inerrant as implemented in the Doctrine of the Church of England 0% (0)
== - 12 inerrant implemented in the US Republican Party platform 0% (0)

 

[Ed Edwards]

Yea! #86 voted right*

#10. The Bible is inerrant in all English translations 10% (9)

* right is defined as "my side"

Thank you 86th voter