Gal 4:30
30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture?
Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
This the same Truth being confirmed here
Rom 11:15
15 For
if the casting away of them[non heirs] be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?
Now the scripture is plain in this analogy that Paul was inspired to use in Gal 4, and that national israel according to the flesh @ Sinai is represented as hagar and her son ishmael Note:
Gal 4:24-25
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
25
For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Which is cast out
Gal 4:30
30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture?
Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
That is national israel according to the flesh, and the promise is "for the son of the bondwoman
shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman."
That cuts off any hope of a future national israel heirship !
The physical nation of jews that were cast away, were not the people of God, Paul makes that clear
Rom 11:1-2
I say then,
Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
2
God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel saying,
Now that cannot be the People of
Rom 11:15 that are cast away
Rom 11:15
15 For
if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?
This casting away is speaking of national israel, which could not have been God's People which He foreknew ! Or we have a big problem with
Rom 11:1-2 !