Please remind me to Never, under any circumstances, trust your research.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It's Been Almost 16 Years...
- Thread starter Rippon
- Start date
- Status
Get specific. Go line-by-line and refute what I said.
For instance, try to prove that there was indeed plane debris and human remains in Shanksville, Pa.
No level of "proof" will be good enough for you. I will give you some evidence, but you will never see it as proof.
In the mean time, prove to me there was not any human remains or plain debris in Shanksville, Pa.
Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Flight 93
https://www.nps.gov/media/photo/gallery.htm?id=C7A45234-155D-451F-67A019C294E6A905
I guess I'm still sane.
Why can't you deal with my straightforward observations?
Witnesses near the site said there was no wreckage nor human remains.
I went to Amazon book reviews and found your book to be lacking. It had 37% 5-star ratings and 44% 1-star ratings.
It would be instructive for you to read the negative reviews.
Last edited:
[/quote][/QUOTE]
You can find a witness to tell you anything. The jet plowed into the ground. The wreckage might not be obvious to some, but it was there.
Obviously, 44% of the people who reviewed the book on Amazon sleep in tin foil hats to keep the aliens from zapping them with mind control rays during their sleep.
What is lacking is nut case web sites that post junk that no adult would consider being fact.
There are. And they have been released to the public. But the cameras are on the outside of the building. The cameras that captured the 767s being flown into the World Trade towers were, for the most part, in the hands of tourists standing several blocks away from the towers.
But the cameras on the Pentagon were so close to the 757 that hit the Pentagon it was going too fast to register as more than a blur. The Terrorists had set the throttles at full power before they hit.
The 757 that crashed in Pennsylvania was going almost straight down at terminal velocity when it hit the ground. Much of the metal of the fuselage buried itself in the soft ground, but there was still a lot of metal and human remains on the ground.
[Edited to add: I found a video of the Pentagon just after the 757 hit it. You can't see the plane, but you can hear Air Traffic Control talking to another airline pilot who saw the 757 hit and reported it to ATC.]
http://www.history.com/topics/9-11-attacks/videos/flight-77-crashes-into-the-pentagon
Last edited:
No! No! Not aliens. It's Major League Baseball! They are the culprits!
Ok, thanks for setting me straight on that one.
People were interviewed shortly after the event. Straightforward --no agenda.
That's what you claim. You offer no proof.
LOL!!!
Might not be obvious to some? Is that all you've got? If it was present, it would be obvious to all.
It would be like denying the elephant in the room.
Show pictures. Demonstrate.
I linked pictures.
You claim that there was still a lot of metal and human remains on the ground. Please furnish evidence of that.
The first thing I told you was that no amount of evidence would compel you.
You've bought into the official narrative hook, line and sinker.
The "official report" has had a history of altering its account. One story goes that the plane went into the soft ground like a bullet, and then the earth sealed over it.
Then there's the tale that the FBI recovered 95% of the plane under the ground having had to dig more than than 25 feet.
What a bunch of bull.
According to eye-witnesses who arrived on the scene long before crews came --there were no plane remnants and certainly no human remains.
You mean convince me. That's right. The "information" from official sources are highly suspect, inconsistent and incomplete.
Why would pics be released 4 and a half years after the event? Why?
What witnesses? Have they been able to prove exactly where they were and exactly when they were there.
Mich of the information was not made available until trial. That is common practice.
Sapper Woody
Well-Known Member
I've got my own ideas on the conspiracy theory. But this sentence makes no sense. If there was no wreckage or remains, then why were they drawn to the scene of nothing before the crews showed up?
Something had to draw them to that spot. So the fact that they were there before the crews were tells me that there was indeed wreckage.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
So all these eyewitnesses that saw a plane flying low and smash into the Pentagon were hallucinating. These 400+ some people that were on the planes that didn't hit the Pentagon and didn't hit auger into the field in Pennsylvania...just vanished? Their loved ones held funerals for no reason?
- Status