'I've never encountered anything so brazen'

[poncho]

Hey uh your record is skipping dude. LoL!

George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/

COZY: BLM leader lives in home owned by Soros’ Open Society board member
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/blacklivesmatter-leader-deray-lives-home-owned-by-soros-connected/

Hacked Soros Memo: $650,000 to Black Lives Matter
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ots-provide-unique-opportunity-reform-police/

Black Lives Matter Rakes in $100 Million from Liberal Foundations

For all its talk of being a street uprising, Black Lives Matter is increasingly awash in cash, raking in pledges of more than $100 million from liberal foundations and others eager to contribute to what has become the grant-making cause du jour.

http://www.policemag.com/channel/pa...-in-100-million-from-liberal-foundations.aspx

Understand the cartoon now? I'll explain, George Soros puts money in one end and the media brainwashed social justice warriors spew the globalist's divide and conquer propaganda out the other.

 

[poncho]

.........

 

[Crabtownboy]

However I feel must be weighed against the alternative which is the bottom line and has to do directly do with motive for you asking me to make a judgment against him. Therefore, I must address your motive first...that is simply the reasonable and rational thing to do when someone asks you to make a character judgment, that if being honest, is concerning a matter of preference.

I do not see why it is so hard to say whether you would be up set or not and why. Don't look for hidden agendas where there are none. If I had donated to a foundation, any foundation, and found the donations were being used for personal needs I would be up set and hope the law followed its course and punished the person who had illegally misused the funds. How about you?

 

[777]

When writing about matters such as this you have to use worlds such as you described or be in danger of being sued for slander. That is why in criminal writings you see the world suspect instead of criminal. The person is not legally a criminal until they are convicted. To call them a criminal is to open yourself up to being sued.

Right, but this is not a criminal matter. The WaPo journolist is doing it here to give the impression of impropriety. The self-dealing charge is arguably the worst, and that is still a civil matter. The IRS code is clear:

https://www.irs.gov/irm/part7/irm_07-027-015.html

no weasel words there. Like the NY AG that's "investigating" Trump's outfit but not Hillary's, this is a partisan hack job when they should be worrying about Julian's penchant and timing for drama.

 

[Zaac]

 

[poncho]

What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?

Social justice warriors believe in an extreme left-wing ideology that combines feminism, progressivism, and political correctness into a totalitarian system that attempts to censor speech and promote fringe lifestyles while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men. They are the internet activist arm of Western progressivism that acts as a vigilante group to ensure compliance and homogeny of far left thought.

The true definition of SJW is up for debate, but most generally it has become a catch-all term that describes feminists and liberals who actively try to solve the perceived social injustices of modern society by organizing in online communities to disseminate propaganda, censor speech, and punish individuals by getting them terminated from their employment. They have also been successful at positioning themselves in the upper echelons of universities, media organizations, and tech companies.

SJW’s do not view all humans as equal

Using a “privilege” hierarchy, SJW’s calculate the worth of a human being based on perceived injustices or wrongs that group has suffered since the time of ancestral man, using selective and narrow interpretations of history. SJW’s elevate groups that they believe have received the least amount of “privilege” in the past, and then use internet activism in the form of mobs and community purges to target those who are determined to have greater amounts of privilege. The idea of privilege is so essential to SJW ideology that a common debate tactic they use is to say “check your privilege,” which roughly translates to, “you must immediately halt or change your speech because your ancestors may or may not have done bad things to women or minority races.”

For example, if a notable white American male makes a joke about a lesbian black woman who practices Islam, SJW’s will coordinate using a combination of blogs, Youtube, and social networking to dox him (publish his personal information, including where he works). They will then pressure the man’s company by flooding it with calls and messages with the goal to remove his source of income while engaging in a mass reporting campaign to get his online accounts suspended.

Continue . . . http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw

WARNING: Stefan Molynuex occasionally uses "adult Language" in his videos.

This explains much doesn't it?

 

[Zaac]

Explains a lot.

 

[poncho]

Their ultimate goal is to silence all speech that they don’t like and which they find offensive while also punishing the speech offender by removing his source of income. As they grow in power, the acceptable range of speech that would trigger an SJW witch hunt is becoming more narrow, and those who are high up on the privilege hierarchy (white men) have to speak through a careful filter if they don’t want to be subject to an SJW attack.

They believe consensus is more important than objectivity

SJW’s do not believe in objectivity. Instead, speech and ideas must be viewed relatively depending on the source and its intended audience. The feeling of the statement must also be taken into account, which can be affected by current news, cultural moods, and pop trends.

< snip >

The lack of such objectivity in SJWism is by design. It’s borrowed from Cultural Marxist thought, which argues that objectivity and the idea of right or wrong is less important than consensus. The reason is that consensus can be easily accomplished by controlling the narrative—cultural facts, ideas, and memes that are possessed by a specific population. If one can manufacture consensus by controlling this narrative through domination of the media or by swiftly eliminating speech which goes against what “should” be believed, specific beliefs can be held even if they go against proven scientific thought or basic rationale. SJW tactics evolved by necessity to keep their ideology alive in a modern climate where science—even 100-year-old science—contradicts the bulk of their ideas.

Continue . . . http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw

 

[InTheLight]

Their ultimate goal is to silence all speech that they don’t like and which they find offensive while also punishing the speech offender by removing his source of income.

Donald Trump said on Friday he plans to change libel laws in the United States so that he can have an easier time suing news organizations.

"One of the things I'm going to do if I win, and I hope we do and we're certainly leading. I'm going to open up our libel laws so when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money. We're going to open up those libel laws. So when The New York Times writes a hit piece which is a total disgrace or when The Washington Post, which is there for other reasons, writes a hit piece, we can sue them and win money instead of having no chance of winning because they're totally protected," Trump said.

 

[poncho]

Sounds like bad news for the SJW's in the media.

What do SJW’s want to achieve?

Their goal is power and domination over the Western cultural narrative to manufacture a consensus that is aligned with their extreme far-left ideology. Since their ideas are so far removed from science, logic, and rationale, this requires a complete control of information to disseminate their immoral world view along with the complete silencing of those who contradict them. It is not clear what their end game is when it comes to the white men who they believe are a bane to planet Earth, but it’s not a stretch to predict violence in the future assuming their mobs grow in size, anger, and power, which would put them close to being classified as terrorists according to the FBI. Currently their main strategies are bullying, spreading propaganda, and censoring opponents.

Continue . . . http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw

 

[Lewis]

Obama isn't running for President again.

LINK
"Hillary Clinton took pains to establish herself as the Democratic candidate who would most faithfully continue the legacy of President Barack Obama at Sunday night’s debate...Clinton mentioned the president 10 times..."

LINK
Barak Obama - "I will consider it a personal insult, an insult to my legacy, if this community lets down it's guard. You want to give me a good send off? Go vote!"

The Southern border has been open for 200+ years. Did you have trouble with previous administrations leaving it open? The Northern border s open. You got a problem with that one too?

Congress and presidents have voted a couple of times to complete the fence. Yet miraculously, it's never been completed and Obama took pains to mock Republicans for saying so, jiving that Republicans want a moat with alligators, and claiming that the fence was indeed finished.

The northern border is much less of a problem, and you know that. The Canadian economy is good, they don't encourage their unemployed to illegally enter the US (as the Mexican government has done), and when is the last time you saw Canadian gang-bangers shooting it out in the streets?

 

[Zaac]

LINK
"Hillary Clinton took pains to establish herself as the Democratic candidate who would most faithfully continue the legacy of President Barack Obama at Sunday night’s debate...Clinton mentioned the president 10 times..."

LINK
Barak Obama - "I will consider it a personal insult, an insult to my legacy, if this community lets down it's guard. You want to give me a good send off? Go vote!"

She's running. She can mention him if she wants to her aid or detriment.

Congress and presidents have voted a couple of times to complete the fence. Yet miraculously, it's never been completed and Obama took pains to mock Republicans for saying so, jiving that Republicans want a moat with alligators, and claiming that the fence was indeed finished.

The fence idea is stupid and just another example of GOP histrionics built up by Sean Hannity and Fox News and adopted by the GOP.

The northern border is much less of a problem, and you know that. The Canadian economy is good, they don't encourage their unemployed to illegally enter the US (as the Mexican government has done), and when is the last time you saw Canadian gang-bangers shooting it out in the streets?

Why is the northern border much less of a problem? People can't get into the country that way?When is the last time YOU saw Mexican gang bagers shooting it out in the streets?

 

[Lewis]

She's running. She can mention him if she wants to her aid or detriment.

That's right, and Hillary has been positioning herself as the continuation of Obama's legacy. That is why he is out there campaigning for her. That is why he has told his listeners that he would "Take it as an insult" if they didn't get out and vote for his successor. You think he meant Trump? Or Hillary?

The fence idea is stupid and just another example of GOP histrionics built up by Sean Hannity and Fox News and adopted by the GOP.

Sure it is. That is why the National Border Patrol Union supports Trump. That is why vice president of Border Council Chris Cabrera said that the border is “Not secure at all. It has actually gotten less secure. We are lucky to catch 40-45% of what crosses.”

When is the last time YOU saw Mexican gang bagers shooting it out in the streets?

Well, 46% of gangs in the US are Hispanic/Latino according to the NationalGangCenter.Gov.
Those gangs consisting of Canadian illegal immigrants = zero.