You don't know how to read my quotes. That's the problem with your understanding.
I have read your post. The problem is not with my understanding. Your entire teaching that Jesus avoided Mary’s DNA, or had a pre‑incarnate human body, is of human invention, of human reasoning apart from revealed Scripture,
You are still confusing categories that Scripture never confuses.
You keep repeating verses, but none of the verses you listed say anything about Jesus avoiding Mary’s DNA, or about Jesus having a human body or human brain before the Incarnation. You are inserting your own assumptions into the text and then insisting that your assumptions are what the verses mean.
That is not exegesis. That is human reasoning apart from revealed Scripture.
Let me address your claims clearly.
1. Matthew 1:20 does not teach what you say it teaches. It does not say Jesus was “already born in the body of Mary.” It says the conception was of the Holy Spirit. Conception is the beginning of human life. You are reading your own idea into the verse.
2. A virgin conception does not require a human sperm cell. You keep insisting that Mary’s ovum could not be used. That is simply false. God does not need a human gamete. God creates the Y chromosome ex nihilo. The rest of the genome comes from Mary. That is exactly what “made of a woman” means (Galatians 4:4).
3. None of the verses you listed teach a pre‑incarnate human body or brain. Genesis 32, John 17, John 8, Hebrews 11, none of these passages say Jesus had a human body before Mary. You are confusing theophanies with the Incarnation. Theophanies are appearances, not permanent human nature.
Scripture says, “The Word became flesh” (John 1:14). Not “The Word already had flesh.” Not “The Word brought flesh from eternity.” Not “The Word used flesh temporarily.” He became flesh in the virgin conception.
4. Your repeated question about Jesus’ brain shows the category mistake. God is a Spirit (John 4:24). Before the Incarnation, the Son had no physical body and no human brain. His human nature began at conception. To claim Jesus had a human brain before Mary is to claim His humanity is eternal, which would make His human nature a created thing and therefore make Christ Himself a created being.
That is not Christian doctrine.
5. You keep saying I have not refuted your verses. But you have not provided a single verse that teaches your position. You have only listed verses and then added your own interpretation on top of them. I cannot refute verses that do not say what you claim they say.
You have not produced one verse that says:
• Jesus avoided Mary’s DNA • Jesus had no genetic connection to Mary • Jesus had a human body before Mary • Jesus had a human brain before Mary • Sin is transmitted by blood • Sin is transmitted by DNA • Sin is a molecule
Not one verse. Not one word. Not one syllable.
6. Your position is not found in Scripture. It is human invention. It is a modern tradition built on misunderstanding biology and misunderstanding Christology. It is not the faith once delivered to the saints.
The biblical doctrine is simple.
The Son is eternal. His human nature began at conception. He took real human flesh from Mary. He was conceived by the Holy Spirit. He was fully God and fully man. He was sinless because He is the eternal Son, not because He avoided Mary’s DNA.
This entire teaching that Jesus avoided Mary’s DNA, or had a pre‑incarnate human body, is of human invention, of human reasoning apart from revealed Scripture.
Scripture, not tradition, is our authority.
