thisnumbersdisconnected
New Member
That was polite. There are all sorts of descriptives I could have used from which I refrained.Critic be polite.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That was polite. There are all sorts of descriptives I could have used from which I refrained.Critic be polite.
WinMan. He won't listen to any Calvinist.
That was polite. There are all sorts of descriptives I could have used from which I refrained.
WinMan. He won't listen to any Calvinist.
My point was that you seem to read all sorts of books all the time, one more couldn't hurt could it?
Winman - If I were going to give you a review of a book like I did to Evan, would you accept the review of a Calvinist - even though this has nothing to do with Calvinism? I personally don't check the stance on free will/election before I will read something worthwhile but it seems Evan feels that others do. Help me understand?
Sure I would.
Let me say something here and now, I don't hate Calvinists, I simply disagree with Calvinism.
That said, there are a few Calvinists here that know how to push my buttons, and I am sure I annoy many of them. That is the nature of disagreement.
I would value their opinions on many other things. If I was going to buy a new car for instance, I would gladly listen to a Calvinist who owns that model of car and heed their advice. Or if I bought a new computer, or most anything really.
I would even listen to a Calvinist about scripture if they could truly present a good argument supported by scripture. But if they just parrot Calvinism and say things like "A man cannot believe unless he is regenerated" without scripture to back it up, I find that very annoying. In fact, I think that type of post should be prohibited, what use is it?
Post your view, but back it up with scripture.
That's what I thought. I think the OP has decided that unless you are of the Calvie camp, you will not accept anything written by a Calvie and honestly, I've never seen that to be the truth. I read a lot of books and don't always know the author's stance on the Doctrines of Grace and honestly, that doesn't affect a lot of things. This book has nothing to do with that part of theology but it questions whether or not God has new revelations for us today. This particular book "oogs" me out (a term we use when we are creeped out by something) even just because of the capitalizations that she uses like "Presence" and "Love". Just who are those two??
Well, as I wrote in another thread, I only have a couple of books, and those were given to me as presents. So, I pretty much have nothing to say about books.
I will say this though, we all believe Jesus speaks to us in some way, although I don't think I could put it accurately into words. Usually when I pray and ask questions, certain scripture comes to mind, and I consider this God giving me the answer. Sometimes I ask over and over again, and sometimes it takes a long time to get an answer.
But I wouldn't write a book on this, this is something a Catholic or Charismatic would go for. I'm not into mystical stuff at all.
But I would listen to Calvinists, I would listen to YOU.
Sure I would.
Let me say something here and now, I don't hate Calvinists, I simply disagree with Calvinism.
That said, there are a few Calvinists here that know how to push my buttons, and I am sure I annoy many of them. That is the nature of disagreement.
I would value their opinions on many other things. If I was going to buy a new car for instance, I would gladly listen to a Calvinist who owns that model of car and heed their advice. Or if I bought a new computer, or most anything really.
I would even listen to a Calvinist about scripture if they could truly present a good argument supported by scripture. But if they just parrot Calvinism and say things like "A man cannot believe unless he is regenerated" without scripture to back it up, I find that very annoying. In fact, I think that type of post should be prohibited, what use is it?
Post your view, but back it up with scripture.
Well, as I wrote in another thread, I only have a couple of books, and those were given to me as presents. So, I pretty much have nothing to say about books.
I will say this though, we all believe Jesus speaks to us in some way, although I don't think I could put it accurately into words. Usually when I pray and ask questions, certain scripture comes to mind, and I consider this God giving me the answer. Sometimes I ask over and over again, and sometimes it takes a long time to get an answer.
But I wouldn't write a book on this, this is something a Catholic or Charismatic would go for. I'm not into mystical stuff at all.
But I would listen to Calvinists, I would listen to YOU.
You are an anti-intellectual which is common among KJVO types. You fail to see the value in open air preaching because you do not read. Was reading about a man last night from another century that open air preached to drunks even when they did not listen! He got harassed and heckled but he still did it! He would preach even without a crowd! If you would read history books you would understand.
By his testimony and the testimony of someone else from 1910 I want to go open air preach in front of the Denver United Methodist Church about their hell bound false doctrine!!!
Yeah, it's obvious to everyone that you are far more intellectual than I am.
Stop trying to divert the subject. I was not talking about me.
WinMan. He won't listen to any Calvinist.
That's "opening"??
We came from similar backgrounds. But God opened both our eyes and moved us to Reformed Theology.