Originally posted by Daniel David:
Johnv and BB, do a search in the N.T. and find the number of times that Jesus said Moses is the author of the Law. [
It is overwhelmingly stating that Moses is the author.
Not really.
Jesus did not directly discuss the authorship of “the Law” (I’m assuming you mean the Pentateuch.) However, He did use the term “Moses” as shorthand for the first five books of the Bible. Have you noticed that Jesus occasionally used the phrase “Law of Moses” to describe both the entire Pentateuch (Luke 24:44) and also the ceremonial law (John 7:23) that was apparently dictated directly by God. I believe we can all agree that the ceremonial law was God’s law, not Moses’ law, so it can easily be concluded that Jesus is referring to the writings themselves instead of the authorship.
A natural reading of the text in the context of the material reveals that the intent of these statements is as a reference to the content of the writings, not the authorship.
Now after saying all of that,, I need to point out that the name of Moses
is traditionally attached to the text and is the basis of these statements using “Moses” as a shorthand for these texts. As Helen and others have pointed out, it is likely that Moses himself (and probably some assistants) gathered ancient texts and put together a history of the children of Israel (especially the book of Genesis which all took place before Moses). This likely possibility does not preclude the inspiration of scripture at all or diminish the contribution of Moses. And as others have noted, the death and obituary of Moses was likely written by someone else, possibly Joshua or perhaps a scribe who worked with Moses.
Johnv, it should be a doctrine becuase it was important to the Lord to say it over and over again.
The Lord did not address the authorship even once. (That was the point of my joke much earlier in this thread.)
Again, this just smacks the liberal idea that Christ is the criterion by which Scripture is understood. Even when he explicitly says something, the libs don't want to listen.
As one who holds to that allegedly liberal idea that Jesus the Christ is the both the focus and interpreter of scripture, I don’t think you truly understand what you are criticizing.
And who are you calling a “lib”?
