• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jews vs Christians

Allan

Active Member
Amy.G said:
I don't understand your interpretation, sorry.

The Kingdom of God is here right now, in believers through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Christ is sitting at the right hand of the Father. You are doing the same thing the Jews did. You are looking for a physical kingdom, when Jesus taught the Kingdom was spiritual, but would one day be physical (new heaven and new earth).

Now I know you probably think I've been taking Amil lessons from someone, but this is what I see in the scriptures. And this after having been taught for YEARS the pre-trib/pre-mil view.
He is doing the same thing the first 400 years of Christianity did. Beileived in an earthly Kingdom to come. The disciples who learned from the Apostles taught this, their learners taught this and so on. It wasn't until MUCH later that this crept into the Churches doctrines.
 

Havensdad

New Member
Allan said:
He is doing the same thing the first 400 years of Christianity did. Beileived in an earthly Kingdom to come. The disciples who learned from the Apostles taught this, their learners taught this and so on. It wasn't until MUCH later that this crept into the Churches doctrines.

The Historic Pre Millenialism taught by the early church is VERY different from the Dispensational version we see now.
 

Amy.G

New Member
Allan said:
He is doing the same thing the first 400 years of Christianity did. Beileived in an earthly Kingdom to come. The disciples who learned from the Apostles taught this, their learners taught this and so on. It wasn't until MUCH later that this crept into the Churches doctrines.
And I also believe in an earthly Kingdom to come, but not the MK as you guys do. I believe it will come when the new heaven and new earth are created.
I don't buy the MK of the pre/mil view.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
Havensdad said:
My friend, you invent a separation between Israel and the Church that is not there. Not only is Israel the Church, Israel has ALWAYS been the Church. Even in the Old Testament, t refers to the "assembly": cross referenced to the Septuagint, we see the same word used: Ekklesia

Mat 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Notice that Peter is an Ethnic Jew. Jews and Gentiles are equal, non distinct parts of God's Church, a.k.a Israel. This has ALWAYS been true.



According to the Bible, all of the literal land promises were fulfilled.

Jos 21:45 Not one word of all the good promises that the LORD had made to the house of Israel had failed; all came to pass.

To quote someone else on this board: "Do you believe God lied here?" Was it ALL the promises, or just "some"?

I believe the Bible. All the promises made had been fulfilled.



I am not Jim. But the verse does not say "Ten men will each grab a 'different' Jew. It says men from all nations will grab ONE (a) Jew: Jesus Christ, the Messiah. This is not some racist mentality, where one person is placed above another because of the color of their skin! The Bible says their is "no distinction".

More:
It is not just the "blessings" we inherit, as you claim. Scripture DIRECTLY refutes what you have claimed, that we are not seed of Abraham. We are now literally considered seed of Abraham.

Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise.

Also, Israel was NEVER confined to those who were literal descendants of Abraham...

How do you answer these verses?

Rom 9:6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, (not everyone in "ethnic" Israel is "true" Israel)

Rom 9:7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but "Through Isaac shall your offspring be named." (Not everyone in true "Israel" is actually descended from Abraham)

Rom 9:8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.

This does not say "You get to share in some of the blessings"! It says we are "counted as offspring"! We ARE Israel! We have not "replaced" them, we are a part of them. We are grafted into Israel, not "grafted into some of the Blessings". All of the Old Testament promises, which have not been fulfilled (those made after Jos 21) apply equally to us. Both we, as well as "ethnic Israel" (and every other ethnic group) grab hold of a Jew (Jesus) and say "we know that God is with you"..

Exactly! Just because a person is born as a Jew does not make them a heir to the promise.. they must be born again...

The current nation of Israel will perish unless they turn to Jesus and recognize them as their true Messiah...

Jesus said he is the only way...

Christians are the true Israel, we did not replace them, but we are the fulfillment of the promise God made to Abraham. Only those that accept Christ as Savior are the Israel of the Bible... There is nothing special about someone born in the current nation of Israel.

To assign something special to today's Israelis is false doctrine... they will go to Hell without Christ.. .and some die daily.

To claim they have something special and God will save them in the end makes Christ a liar.. He said HE is the only way...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
Havensdad said:
My friend, you invent a separation between Israel and the Church that is not there. Not only is Israel the Church, Israel has ALWAYS been the Church. Even in the Old Testament, t refers to the "assembly": cross referenced to the Septuagint, we see the same word used: Ekklesia
That isn't what Scripture teaches. You will find nowhere in Scripture where the church which is the body of Christ is equated with Israel. If you have a place, I will be glad to look at it. So far, I haven't seen one.

Mat 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Notice that Peter is an Ethnic Jew. Jews and Gentiles are equal, non distinct parts of God's Church, a.k.a Israel. This has ALWAYS been true.
Jews and Gentiles and equal in the church, but not in Israel. If you read the OT, you will see that very clearly. Gentiles as proselytes were not given full rights in Israel.

According to the Bible, all of the literal land promises were fulfilled.
So if that is true in Joshua, why is the promise repeated more than 1000 years later?

Jos 21:45 Not one word of all the good promises that the LORD had made to the house of Israel had failed; all came to pass.

To quote someone else on this board: "Do you believe God lied here?" Was it ALL the promises, or just "some"?
I think God told the truth. Which "good promises" were being referred to? If you read the Bible, it is the "good promises" about the conquest of the land.

I am not Jim. But the verse does not say "Ten men will each grab a 'different' Jew. It says men from all nations will grab ONE (a) Jew: Jesus Christ, the Messiah.
Can you show that from the Scripture itself?

This is not some racist mentality, where one person is placed above another because of the color of their skin! The Bible says their is "no distinction".
So was there racism with God when he chose Israel over all other nations? Of course not. Your argument makes no sense. When the Bible says there is no distinction, you have to give a reference so we can look at it. the Bible uses that terminology two ways that I can think of: 1) with respect to judgment ... both Jew and Gentile are sinner and God does not respect persons; 2) with respect to believers in the church. To my knowledge, God never makes that statement with respect to his promises to Israel.

It is not just the "blessings" we inherit, as you claim. Scripture DIRECTLY refutes what you have claimed, that we are not seed of Abraham. We are now literally considered seed of Abraham.

Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise.
Where did I claim differently? Again you are confusing things. Those of faith are Abraham's offspring in the gospel. But the promises were made to Abraham's genetic seed in Genesis 17, specifically not non-genetic seed.

How do you answer these verses?

Rom 9:6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, (not everyone in "ethnic" Israel is "true" Israel)

Rom 9:7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but "Through Isaac shall your offspring be named." (Not everyone in true "Israel" is actually descended from Abraham)

Rom 9:8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.

This does not say "You get to share in some of the blessings"! It says we are "counted as offspring"! We ARE Israel! We have not "replaced" them, we are a part of them. We are grafted into Israel, not "grafted into some of the Blessings". All of the Old Testament promises, which have not been fulfilled (those made after Jos 21) apply equally to us. Both we, as well as "ethnic Israel" (and every other ethnic group) grab hold of a Jew (Jesus) and say "we know that God is with you"..
My answer is just read the text careully. Paul's point there is about his "kinsmen according to the flesh." That is not you and I as Gentiles. It is Jews. This is so simple I can't imagine you even ask that. I suppose I should cease to be amazed but somehow I never am.

Again, let's just look at the text: It says, "For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel," It does not say, "For not all who "belong to Israel are descended from Israel." Or to put it this way, you are affirming something the text doesn't address. It says nothing about whether or not "Israel" has some from outside of genetic Israel in it. I think it doesn't, but the text doesn't say that. The text simply says that everyone in one group (descended from Israel) are in another group ("Israel"). It says nothing about who else might or might not be in the second group.



The point of Romans 9 is that one does not have salvation simply by being an ethnic Jew. It takes more, not less.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

J.D.

Active Member
Site Supporter
Havensdad said:
I am not Jim. But the verse does not say "Ten men will each grab a 'different' Jew. It says men from all nations will grab ONE (a) Jew: Jesus Christ, the Messiah.
I was glad to see someone bring that up. We ARE hanging on to the garment of a Jew - his name is Jesus Christ.
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
I don't understand your interpretation, sorry.
Okay. Read the text and see who Jesus is talking to and then ask if it makes sense that Jesus is saying that the kingdom is inside of those who rejected him.

The Kingdom of God is here right now, in believers through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Christ is sitting at the right hand of the Father. You are doing the same thing the Jews did. You are looking for a physical kingdom, when Jesus taught the Kingdom was spiritual, but would one day be physical (new heaven and new earth).
The new heavens and earth is not the kingdom in biblical terms. If someone says the kingdom is present now spiritually, I suppose that is okay in some sense, but when you read the OT descriptions of the kingdom, you see that it involves much more than something inside of you. Again, I think this is where ignorance of the OT causes great problems.

Now I know you probably think I've been taking Amil lessons from someone, but this is what I see in the scriptures. And this after having been taught for YEARS the pre-trib/pre-mil view.
I don't think you see that in Scriptures. Again, just read the OT without a bias for any particular view. Having studied and taught the minor prophets, I am amazed that anyone can, with a straight face, say they are amillennial. It is impossible to get past the minor prophets with such a view without destroying the integrity of the text. And that is something I simply cannot do.
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
I was glad to see someone bring that up. We ARE hanging on to the garment of a Jew - his name is Jesus Christ.
Again I ask, can you show that from the text?

If you read the passage, you will see that people are "going up to the Lord," not grabbing onto the Lord.

Come on folks, at least get involved in the text itself.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
This verse sums it up

Gal 3:29 And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise.

Let's look at this...

"And if you are Christ's" Saved, redeemed, Justified, born again, regenerated... all terms that describe saved people, Jesus' church.... His called out people...

"then you are Abraham's offspring"
A descendent of Abraham... a term in the Bible to denote the Jewish People..

"heirs according to promise." the people who receive what was promised... Promised who? To Abraham...

Therefore the church (those who are Christ's) is Israel (Abraham's Offspring) and will receive (Heirs of the promise) what God promised Abraham.

The Bible can't be more plainer than that...

It is not about genetics anymore.. it is about faith.
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
Tiny,

You have to look at all of Scripture. The promise of Gal 3 is the promise of the gospel. It does not address the other promises except to say that they were not annulled. No one in the OT could have been "Christ's" in the NT sense since he had not died and risen again yet. When you think about it, that doesn't make a lot of sense. They are not saved apart from Christ to be sure, but let's not ignore what the Scripture says.

BTW, let me add and not to Tiny directly, that I think a lot of the confusion is that people have not studied the OT enough to know what to do with it if they don't apply it to the church. It is, in some ways, the easy way out. Rather than take the time to figure it out, they offer a few gloss over remarks and proof texts and never really are forced to get into it.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
God doesn't lie. He fulfilled His promise to Abraham as the following Scripture show.

Joshua 21:43-45
43 And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.
44 And the LORD gave them rest round about, according to all that he sware unto their fathers: and there stood not a man of all their enemies before them; the LORD delivered all their enemies into their hand.
45 There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass.


1 Kings 8:56
56 Blessed be the LORD, that hath given rest unto his people Israel, according to all that he promised: there hath not failed one word of all his good promise, which he promised by the hand of Moses his servant.

Nehemiah 9: 7-26
7 Thou art the LORD the God, who didst choose Abram, and broughtest him forth out of Ur of the Chaldees, and gavest him the name of Abraham;
8 And foundest his heart faithful before thee, and madest a covenant with him to give the land of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Jebusites, and the Girgashites, to give it, I say, to his seed, and hast performed thy words; for thou art righteous:

9 And didst see the affliction of our fathers in Egypt, and heardest their cry by the Red sea;
10 And shewedst signs and wonders upon Pharaoh, and on all his servants, and on all the people of his land: for thou knewest that they dealt proudly against them. So didst thou get thee a name, as it is this day.
11 And thou didst divide the sea before them, so that they went through the midst of the sea on the dry land; and their persecutors thou threwest into the deeps, as a stone into the mighty waters.
12 Moreover thou leddest them in the day by a cloudy pillar; and in the night by a pillar of fire, to give them light in the way wherein they should go.
13 Thou camest down also upon mount Sinai, and spakest with them from heaven, and gavest them right judgments, and true laws, good statutes and commandments:
14 And madest known unto them thy holy sabbath, and commandedst them precepts, statutes, and laws, by the hand of Moses thy servant:
15 And gavest them bread from heaven for their hunger, and broughtest forth water for them out of the rock for their thirst, and promisedst them that they should go in to possess the land which thou hadst sworn to give them.
16 But they and our fathers dealt proudly, and hardened their necks, and hearkened not to thy commandments,
17 And refused to obey, neither were mindful of thy wonders that thou didst among them; but hardened their necks, and in their rebellion appointed a captain to return to their bondage: but thou art a God ready to pardon, gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and forsookest them not.
18 Yea, when they had made them a molten calf, and said, This is thy God that brought thee up out of Egypt, and had wrought great provocations;
19 Yet thou in thy manifold mercies forsookest them not in the wilderness: the pillar of the cloud departed not from them by day, to lead them in the way; neither the pillar of fire by night, to shew them light, and the way wherein they should go.
20 Thou gavest also thy good spirit to instruct them, and withheldest not thy manna from their mouth, and gavest them water for their thirst.
21 Yea, forty years didst thou sustain them in the wilderness, so that they lacked nothing; their clothes waxed not old, and their feet swelled not.
22 Moreover thou gavest them kingdoms and nations, and didst divide them into corners: so they possessed the land of Sihon, and the land of the king of Heshbon, and the land of Og king of Bashan.
23 Their children also multipliedst thou as the stars of heaven, and broughtest them into the land, concerning which thou hadst promised to their fathers, that they should go in to possess it.
24 So the children went in and possessed the land, and thou subduedst before them the inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites, and gavest them into their hands, with their kings, and the people of the land, that they might do with them as they would.
25 And they took strong cities, and a fat land, and possessed houses full of all goods, wells digged, vineyards, and oliveyards, and fruit trees in abundance: so they did eat, and were filled, and became fat, and delighted themselves in thy great goodness.

26 Nevertheless they were disobedient, and rebelled against thee, and cast thy law behind their backs, and slew thy prophets which testified against them to turn them to thee, and they wrought great provocations.


I hate to say it but some people on this forum have a history of tieing the words God and lie together. They need to contemplate the following Scripture Hebrews 6:18. That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Amy.G said:
It means that the whole Bible is about Christ. Everything written is for the purpose of revealing a Savior.

Amy your posts are excellent. I thought you would be interested in seeing what the Baptist Faith and Message states the Scripture. You can find the 1925, 1963, 2000 Messages side by side at: http://sbc.net/bfm/bfmcomparison.asp



I. The Scriptures: 1925 Baptist Faith and Message


We believe that the Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired, and is a perfect treasure of heavenly instruction; that it has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter; that it reveals the principles by which God will judge us; and therefore is, and will remain to the end of the world, the true center of Christian union, and the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds and religious opinions should be tried.


I. The Scriptures: 1963 Baptist Faith and Message

The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is the record of God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. It reveals the principles by which God judges us; and therefore is, and will remain to the end of the world, the true center of Christian union, and the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and religious opinions should be tried. The criterion by which the Bible is to be interpreted is Jesus Christ.


I. The Scriptures> 2000 Baptist Faith and Message

The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. Therefore, all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy. It reveals the principles by which God judges us, and therefore is, and will remain to the end of the world, the true center of Christian union, and the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and religious opinions should be tried. All Scripture is a testimony to Christ, who is Himself the focus of divine revelation.

Please notice that the Scriptures are the true center of Christian Union, nothing about Jews and Christians in Gods plan for the future. Notice also that the 1963 and 2000 Messages confirms your statement that "Everything written is for the purpose of revealing a Savior."
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
OldRegular said:
God doesn't lie. He fulfilled His promise to Abraham as the following Scripture show.
But do the following Scriptures show that?

Joshua 21:43-45 ... 1 Kings 8:56 ... Nehemiah 9: 7-26
Wow ... where to start. First, let's start with your last citation and let's not quote selectively. Let's start where you left off.

Nehemiah 9:27-31 "Therefore You delivered them into the hand of their oppressors who oppressed them, But when they cried to You in the time of their distress, You heard from heaven, and according to Your great compassion You gave them deliverers who delivered them from the hand of their oppressors. 28 "But as soon as they had rest, they did evil again before You; Therefore You abandoned them to the hand of their enemies, so that they ruled over them. When they cried again to You, You heard from heaven, And many times You rescued them according to Your compassion, 29 And admonished them in order to turn them back to Your law. Yet they acted arrogantly and did not listen to Your commandments but sinned against Your ordinances, By which if a man observes them he shall live. And they turned a stubborn shoulder and stiffened their neck, and would not listen. 30 "However, You bore with them for many years, And admonished them by Your Spirit through Your prophets, Yet they would not give ear. Therefore You gave them into the hand of the peoples of the lands. 31 "Nevertheless, in Your great compassion You did not make an end of them or forsake them, For You are a gracious and compassionate God.

So clearly, Nehemiah is a historical recitation of God's providential work that closes with the premillennialists' point: You did not make an end of them or forsake them.

Second, let's compare your references to the promise: I will give to you and to your descendants after you, the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God." (Genesis 17:8).

Your citation of Nehemiah once again proves that it does not support your point because God has given Israel into the hands of the people of the land (something strange is Israel is the church).

In those passages you cite, did the descendants of Abraham inhabit the promised land "forever"? If so, then how do you explain the exile in 586? How do you explain the current situation?

Remember, if you read the OT the promise of the land involves peaceful dwelling:

2 Samuel 7:10-11 I will also appoint a place for My people Israel and will plant them, that they may live in their own place and not be disturbed again, nor will the wicked afflict them any more as formerly, 11 even from the day that I commanded judges to be over My people Israel; and I will give you rest from all your enemies.

Is Israel currently dwelling in the land in peace?

This whole idea that Israel is the church is patently ludicrous. The church is a regenerate people. Israel was not. Israel constantly showed their unbelief. And they were punished for it. But it seems that not very many here are actually thinking about that. Again, it makes me wonder why we are not dealing with more Scripture.

I ask you as I did Jim, when do you think Zech 8:23 will be fulfilled? We already showed that it is not referring to Jesus. So when will it be fulfilled?

I hate to say it but some people on this forum have a history of tieing the words God and lie together. They need to contemplate the following Scripture Hebrews 6:18. That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
Exactly my point. This is what I have been trying to emphasize. Your position has the affect (unintentionally I am sure) of making God out to be a liar.

God said the descendants of Abraham would live in the promised land forever in peace. You say they won't. It seems to me that it is hard to escape the conclusion that one of you is not telling the truth. Given your citation of Hebrews 6:18, I have to say that God is telling the truth, and therefore Israel will be restored to the land in peace.

Seriously ... and I am not being patronizing in the least or making a personal attack ... But I seriously do not see how you avoid making God out to be a liar. I know you don't intend to. I do not doubt your sincerity. But how do you avoid it? The Bible says that God has not cast off Israel forever, yet you say he has and is now making the church Israel.

BTW, your position makes mincemeat out of Romans 11:25 where it says that a partial hardening has happened to Israel. You either have to say that the church has been partially hardened (since you claim that Israel is the church) or you have to make an arbitrary reassignment of meaning to say that "Israel" actually means "Israel," in which case you have undermined your whole point.

As I have said often, and you have demonstrated handily, you cannot win this discussion on the basis of Scripture. At every turn, Scripture disproves amillennialism. There is some support for historic premillennialism. But there is no Scripture support for amillennialism in the Scripture itself. It all comes from outside, and then Scripture has to be read in light of the conclusions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Allan said:
Amy, who other than Old Reg, has made any such statements that the Jews will "rule over Christians". We (the church) shal rule with Christ but they shall also rule or better be partakers in leading though lower than us. Much like our government. We have the President (Christ) as well as the Senate and Congress.
Both groups are ruling but one has more authority and power than the other. So it will be in the MK.

John F. Walvoord, the preeminent dispensational theologianand former president of Dallas theological seminary, in his book Major Bible Prophecies, page 391 states:

"The place of Israel and their restoration in the millennial kingdom cannot be overemphasized, for Israel is a major part of God's purpose to subdue the whole earth. Accordingly, the return of Israel to the land, their spiritual restoration, and Christ's government over them are essential to God's purpose. As such the children of Israel will be exalted above the Gentiles and given a special favored place as God's chosen people. Gentiles will also have a major place in the millennial kingdom but will be second to Israel in their spiritual blessing."

Walvoord also teaches in Major Bible Prophecies that David will reign as coregent with Jesus Christ in the millennial kingdom. He writes [page 393] "Though many have tried to explain away this passage [Ezekiel 37:24-25], it obviously requires the Second Coming of Christ, the establishment of David’s kingdom on earth, the resurrection of David, and David’s sharing the throne of Israel as coregent with Christ."

STRANGE isn't it!:thumbs:
 

Jim1999

<img src =/Jim1999.jpg>
I can't recall ever saying that Israel was the church. I have said that the church is the Israel of God; the kingdom of God. It is a whole new era; the era of Jesus, the Christ.

The prophecies of old are either fulfilled in the church or at worst will be fulfilled. Israel the nation is just that, a secular nation.

So long as one follows the Plymouth Brethren doctrines of dispensationalism they will never see beyond the unimaginable divisions of scriptures. By the way, Dallas Seminary is not even a Baptist school. It is a harbour of dispensationalism and I fear our Fellowship school is filled with Dallas graduates and we too will face this errant theology and church doctrines.

Cheers,

Jim
 

Pilgrimer

Member
Havensdad said:
I am not Jim. But the verse does not say "Ten men will each grab a 'different' Jew. It says men from all nations will grab ONE (a) Jew: Jesus Christ, the Messiah.

I had never considered that, but it's interesting. I have come to understood the passage from Zechariah to refer to the Apostles, that it is these Jewish believers whose skirts the Gentiles have latched onto and been led to the Lord, after all, who gave the world the Gospel? The Gentiles would know nothing of the Lord, or how to find Him, were it not for the testimony of these men.

But there is more: the Apostles were given authority over the church. Who delivered the Word of God through the Gospels and Epistles they wrote that the church lives by? Where did we get our doctrine that governs our lives? Jews. That's why the Apostles of Christ each are seated on thrones with Christ, ruling and reigning over the household of God through their testimony and teaching that they have left us.

"Ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you."

I have been thinking that was a prophecy about the Apostles leading Gentiles to Christ. But I never noticed that it speaks of "a" Jew, so maybe it is a prophecy about Paul. After all, Paul is called "the Apostle to the Gentiles."

In Christ,
Pilgrimer
 

Amy.G

New Member
OldRegular said:
Walvoord also teaches in Major Bible Prophecies that David will reign as coregent with Jesus Christ in the millennial kingdom. He writes [page 393] "Though many have tried to explain away this passage [Ezekiel 37:24-25], it obviously requires the Second Coming of Christ, the establishment of David’s kingdom on earth, the resurrection of David, and David’s sharing the throne of Israel as coregent with Christ."

STRANGE isn't it!:thumbs:
Say what??

That prophecy is about Christ. It doesn't refer to David literally.

In Ez. 37:24-27 it makes these statements:

They shall have one shepherd. (Christ, not David and Christ)

They shall dwell therein, even they, and their children, and their children's children forever;

My servant David (Christ) shall be their prince forever. (Prince of peace/Jesus Christ)

I will set My sanctuary in the midst of them for evermore. (New Jerusalem)

The MK does not last forever, therefore this passage cannot speak of a 1000 year period.
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
STRANGE isn't it!
And what is strange about that?

Again, let's look at the whole passage in context:

21 "Say to them, 'Thus says the Lord GOD, "Behold, I will take the sons of Israel from among the nations where they have gone, and I will gather them from every side and bring them into their own land; 22 and I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel; and one king will be king for all of them; and they will no longer be two nations and no longer be divided into two kingdoms.
When was the church ever two nations that they could be restored into one? Hint: They weren't. They were "not a nation."

24 "My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd; and they will walk in My ordinances and keep My statutes and observe them.
Some people believe that David will be a co-ruler with Christ. That's not all that unbelievable. The Bible says that Christians will rule with Christ as well, so I am not sure why a resurrected David would be problemmatic.


25 "They will live on the land that I gave to Jacob My servant, in which your fathers lived; and they will live on it, they, and their sons and their sons' sons, forever; and David My servant will be their prince forever.
Now this is problematic. If you want to make this the New Jerusalem or new heaven and new earth, you will have to show when Israel lived there in the past.

27 "My dwelling place also will be with them; and I will be their God, and they will be My people. 28 "And the nations will know that I am the LORD who sanctifies Israel, when My sanctuary is in their midst forever."'"
What nations will exist in the new heavens and new earth to know that YHWH is the Lord who sanctifies Israel? This only makes sense in a millennial kingdom, particularly if you believe there are no more national distinctions in the body of Christ.

I think if you take a serious look at this passage, it is yet another that will show the fallacy of amillennialism. Again, you simply cannot win if you deal with the text.

And calling it "strange" doesn't really make an argument.

BTW, OR, I notice that again you won't deal with the Scripture and arguments that I put forth. Why?
 

Pastor Larry

<b>Moderator</b>
Site Supporter
That prophecy is about Christ. It doesn't refer to David literally.
On what textual and exegetical basis do you make this declaration?

The MK does not last forever, therefore this passage cannot speak of a 1000 year period.
The word translated "forever" is the Hebrew word 'olam which has a semantic range that includes not only "forever" but "a long period of time." It is used that way quite often actually. So this presents no problem since 1000 years is a "long time" by anyone's definition I would imagine.

That probably not something you would know unless you have taken time to study it a bit. Most pastors don't bother to point that out, particularly when it provides evidence against their position.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Pastor Larry said:
God said the descendants of Abraham would live in the promised land forever in peace. You say they won't. It seems to me that it is hard to escape the conclusion that one of you is not telling the truth. Given your citation of Hebrews 6:18, I have to say that God is telling the truth, and therefore Israel will be restored to the land in peace.

Strange, you say: "God said the descendants of Abraham would live in the promised land forever in peace."

Yet dispensational theology claims that the forever lasts only 1000 little ole years. Now who is lying?
 
Top