Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Brennan is the one who voted for USA Communist Party boss Gus Hall for President of the USA a few years ago in 1976.
Some say that John Brennan got in trouble with the Saudis a few years ago and converted to Islam to get out of the jam:
In February 2013, John Guandolo, a former Marine who subsequently worked eight years in the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division as a “subject matter expert” regarding the Muslim Brotherhood and the global spread of Islam, stated that Brennan had converted to Islam years earlier in Saudi Arabia. Said Guandolo:
“Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on the behalf of the United States in Saudi Arabia. That fact alone is not what is most disturbing. His conversion to Islam was the culmination of a counterintelligence operation against him to recruit him. The fact that foreign intelligence service operatives recruited Mr. Brennan when he was in a very sensitive and senior U.S. government position in a foreign country means that he either is a traitor … [or] he has the inability to discern and understand how to walk in those kinds of environments, which makes him completely unfit to be the director of Central Intelligence.... The facts of the matter are confirmed by U.S. government officials who were also in Saudi Arabia at the time that John Brennan was serving there and have direct knowledge. These are men who work in very trusted positions, they were direct witnesses to his growing relationship with the individuals who worked for the Saudi government and others and they witnessed his conversion to Islam."
Guandolo's claim about Brennan's conversion has never been corroborated by an independent source.
John Brennan - Discover the Networks
The point is it's not just Brennan...more and more of those 'in the know' are coming to the conclusion that Trump is a danger to your Constitution.Trump was within his rights to yank the clearance of Brennan. Case closed.
Trump was within his rights to yank the clearance of Brennan. Case closed.
The point is it's not just Brennan...more and more of those 'in the know' are coming to the conclusion that Trump is a danger to your Constitution.
CMG doesn't live in my country yet that doesn't stop him commenting on all our perceived woes with the Muzzies and May. So is Double Standards a game we can all join in?Of course he was and never mind he doesn't live in this country the article was against Trump and that is all that matters.
I would remind you that Hitler acted legally throughout...not that I'm comparing Donnie to Adolf...for starters, Adolf was brighter.If Trump is acting legally, how can he be a danger? Your charge falls of its own weight. Carlos Slim, one of the richest men in the world, owns a part of the NYT so if you see him, tell him hola since he hates Trump, too.
The point is it's not just Brennan...more and more of those 'in the know' are coming to the conclusion that Trump is a danger to your Constitution.
Slang for Muslim.Does anyone know what a "muzzie" is?
But pay no attention to me then. Write me off as a "darn Godless librul" or "furriner" if you must. But listen to the guys cited in the article who care about their countryLiberals do not even know what our constitution says. In fact what little they know of it they hate. A liberal trying to tell others they are a danger to the constitution is quite like the pot calling the kettle black.
I would remind you that Hitler acted legally throughout...not that I'm comparing Donnie to Adolf...for starters, Adolf was brighter.
You have got to be kidding me!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trump is a danger to your Constitution.
Which bit are you disputing, the intelligence or the legality point.I mean really......?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you for your concern, Matt. The reasonable people in this country plan to take care of this problem on November 6 this year. If the Democrats win the majority of the House of Representatives, then they will be able to effectively hamstring Trump’s agenda and provide the congressional oversight of his administration that the GOP majority has failed to do. Of course, Trump, being a transactional rather than an ideological person, could change back to his pre-2011 persona when he supported liberal Democrats, and work with the Democrats. I don’t doubt that Trump’s hardcore base would follow him since they are not following him based on principle but based on his personality.
Which bit are you disputing, the intelligence or the legality point.
I made the point in all seriousness to illustrate the point that just because something is done legally doesn't mean that it isn't a threat, that it makes it right. Slavery was legal. Segregation was legal.