John MacArthur - Dispensationalism

[37818]

Historical premil was the dominant church position until Augustine made Amil replace it!

Can you provide a reference.

 

[JesusFan]

LOL. I've never heard that one before! I'm stealing that.

Wonder if his best buddy Dr Sproul hanging around to greet Big mac when goes to heaven and "straighten him out?"

 

[JesusFan]

Can you provide a reference.

https://faithalone.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/anderson.pdf

 

[Van]

You are mixed up. Calvinist can be dispensationalists as MacArthur proves. It seems you just have your tired axe to grind.

Yet another "run from actual Calvinism" post.

Anthony Charles wrote the following:

To me, a Reformed Christian or “self respecting Calvinist” should not be a premillennial dispensationalist because it’s unbiblical, unorthodox, divisive (bringing back the dividing wall between Jews and gentiles), and it brings dishonor to Christ (in saying that there is sin and failure in His Kingdom).​

Do some people claim to be dispensationalist and Calvinist? Yes, but they depart from Reformed Theology.

 

[Aaron]

Yet another "run from actual Calvinism" post.

Anthony Charles wrote the following:

To me, a Reformed Christian or “self respecting Calvinist” should not be a premillennial dispensationalist because it’s unbiblical, unorthodox, divisive (bringing back the dividing wall between Jews and gentiles), and it brings dishonor to Christ (in saying that there is sin and failure in His Kingdom).​

Do some people claim to be dispensationalist and Calvinist? Yes, but they depart from Reformed Theology.

You should listen to Anthony Charles. He left out that it's a temporal reward in a kingdom that is supposed to be eternal.

 

[Van]

You should listen to Anthony Charles. He left out that it's a temporal reward in a kingdom that is supposed to be eternal.

Yet another off topic post, some Calvinist claimed Reformed Theology was not primarily Amillennialist. Calvinism embraces Amillennialism, primarily, and thus the many posts saying Dr. MacArthur is not really a Calvinist.

 

[Aaron]

Yet another off topic post, some Calvinist claimed Reformed Theology was not primarily Amillennialist. Calvinism embraces Amillennialism, primarily, and thus the many posts saying Dr. MacArthur is not really a Calvinist.

Who cares about MacArthur? How can my post be 'off topic' when in direct response to something posted unless...

unless...

...YOU were off topic?

 

[Aaron]

Yet another off topic post, some Calvinist claimed Reformed Theology was not primarily Amillennialist. Calvinism embraces Amillennialism, primarily, and thus the many posts saying Dr. MacArthur is not really a Calvinist.

But that doesn't change the fact that you should seriously consider what was said in the quote you cited. You're 'off topic' dance is just a diversion.

 

[Van]

Who cares about MacArthur? How can my post be 'off topic' when in direct response to something posted unless...

unless...

...YOU were off topic?

Is it always about you and not about amillennalism, or the topic de jure?

 

[Van]

But that doesn't change the fact that you should seriously consider what was said in the quote you cited. You're 'off topic' dance is just a diversion.

The point of the quote was not the false doctrine cited, but that Calvinism is primarily ammillennalist.

 

[Aaron]

The point of the quote was not the false doctrine cited, but that Calvinism is primarily ammillennalist.

I know your point. That doesn't change the fact you haven't considered what was being said.

 

[Aaron]

Is it always about you and not about amillennalism, or the topic de jure?

'Yet another' diversion.

You and I will be meeting in a pub in the not too distant future with 90lb copies of The Institutes tucked under our arms.

 

[Van]

I know your point. That doesn't change the fact you haven't considered what was being said.

Yet another Calvinist claiming the ability to read minds. This is the sort of intellectual fire power needed to embrace the bogus views of Calvinism.

 

[Van]

'Yet another' diversion.

You and I will be meeting in a pub in the not too distant future with 90lb copies of The Institutes tucked under our arms.

I have posted detailed rebuttals citing chapter and verse of the many bogus assertions in the Institutes.

 

[Aaron]

I have posted detailed rebuttals citing chapter and verse of the many bogus assertions in the Institutes.

Yes, based on your linear thinking which will all be changed once you come to the truth.

 

[Van]

Yes, based on your linear thinking which will all be changed once you come to the truth.

More mind reading, and probably using time travel or crystal ball theology.

 

[Judith]

John MacArthur - Dispensationalism - Part 3 (Bible Q&A) - YouTube

 

[Reformed1689]

Anthony Charles wrote the following:

Who?

 

[Reformed1689]

Calvinist Soteriology and Dispensationalism are not at odds with each other @Van

MacArthur proves that, I prove that.

 

[Van]

Who?

Yet another post, signifying nothing.