37818
Well-Known Member
No. I like that you posted them.Did you read the commentaries I posted? The KJV got the TRANSLATION wrong
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No. I like that you posted them.Did you read the commentaries I posted? The KJV got the TRANSLATION wrong
I never claimed Judas was saved.Which claim?
You used the phrase "Christ died for Judas" and I just stated what that phrase meant biblically.1. That is off topic for this thread, please start a different thread. 2. You need to look at some context.
I would have pasted them in the thread but it was too many wordsNo. I like that you posted them.
I am not arguing that Judas was not present. I believe that can be debated as to how long he was present, but he was at least present for part of the supper. What I am saying is that in verse 18 Jesus has already demonstrated that the promises he is giving in that room is not for everyone present, namely Judas. So you then bank your position on Jesus saying this is my blood given for you. But he has already made clear he is not making his promises to everyone in that room.
The argument has been that Judas was present when Jesus said this is my body which is broken for you and that must mean he died for Judas as well. My point is that in John 13, which happened before that part of the supper, Jesus is on record as saying that he is not speaking to all of them even when he says "you".
Clearly you did not read my post. We are not talking about whether or not he was there.Joh 13:2 And supper being ended, the devil having already put it into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, to betray Him,
Joh 13:18 "I do not speak concerning all of you. I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture may be fulfilled, 'HE WHO EATS BREAD WITH ME HAS LIFTED UP HIS HEEL AGAINST ME.'
Joh 13:21 When Jesus had said these things, He was troubled in spirit, and testified and said, "Most assuredly, I say to you, one of you will betray Me."
Joh 13:26 Jesus answered, "It is he to whom I shall give a piece of bread when I have dipped it." And having dipped the bread, He gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon.
Joh 13:27 Now after the piece of bread, Satan entered him. Then Jesus said to him, "What you do, do quickly."
Jesus is also on record as saying that the one He gave the piece of bread to was the one that would betray Him. Once He had done this He told Judas to do what he intended to do. So your argument really falls flat.
Actually it is not that Judas was or was not there that matters. Jesus died for sinners so if Judas was a sinner then Christ Jesus died for him.
Rom 3:9 ...For we have previously charged both Jews and Greeks that they are all under sin.
Rom 3:22 ...For there is no difference;
Rom 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
1Ti 2:5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus,
1Ti 2:6 who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time,
So did Christ Jesus die for Judas, YES. Was Judas saved, NO and why, because he did not trust in Christ Jesus.
1534 Tyndale, . . . supper was ended . . . .The KJV got the TRANSLATION wrong
Yep, all wrong. Just reading the passage demonstrates this, this is not complicated.1534 Tyndale, . . . supper was ended . . . .
1535 Coverdale, . . . after supper . . . .
1539 Great Bible, . . . supper was ended . . . .
1560 Geneva Bible, . . . supper was done . . . .
1568 Bishops Bible, . . . supper was ended . . . .
Clearly you did not read my post. We are not talking about whether or not he was there.
Present what is true and why.Yep, all wrong. Just reading the passage demonstrates this, this is not complicated.
READ THE OP!!!! Good grief.Present what is true and why.
Luke 22:19-21 teaches it was after the supper.
. . . μετα το δειπνησαι . . .
Not tonight.READ THE OP!!!! Good grief.
Frustrating that you keep commenting and have not even read the OP which answers all of your questions and arguments.Not tonight.
And my point, is the correct reading cannot be that supper was already over. That doesn't make sense culturally and it doesn't make sense textually. So if you read the commentaries you know that the correct understanding is either After supper was served or during supper etc.I read your PDF.
My comment is the original reading of Codex Sinaiticus for γενομενου was γεινομενου.
The first correction was to make it read as γενομενου. The second correction was to restore it's original reading. Image of page of Codex and and that word.
View attachment 6017
I know you do not understand fully my view on this.And my point, is the correct reading cannot be that supper was already over. That doesn't make sense culturally and it doesn't make sense textually. So if you read the commentaries you know that the correct understanding is either After supper was served or during supper etc.
That's only true if you believe in the Reformed interpretation of the gospel. I do not and therefore I believe that Jesus died for everyone. Of course to be saved a person must accept Him as their Lord and Savior AND follow Him.So then you agree he was not one of the sheep and Jesus did not say he laid his life down for everyone, he laid his life down for the sheep.
So you argue that everyone is part of the sheep fold?That's only true if you believe in the Reformed interpretation of the gospel. I do not and therefore I believe that Jesus died for everyone. Of course to be saved a person must accept Him as their Lord and Savior AND follow Him.