• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Just how LIMITED is the ATONEMENT?

Status
Not open for further replies.

quantumfaith

Active Member
Of course it is, you'll lose in answering a direct question concisely so instead you bound off.

My post was no more drivel than that of skn.

Next time use unbiased judgment before you accuse anyone of anything, and be ready to use the same judgment upon all. OK?

His blog, and objective here against the cal brethren stem from misinformation and misunderstanding.

More drivel. But I know you won't be happy until you have the last word. Tell you what, I am leaving for a while. Feel free to continue the conversation....with yourself.
 

Winman

Active Member
Again I ask, how much of Calvinism have you studied and do you understand? None of what you've said answered such a direct question.

You don't have to know everything about a theology to know it is error. I know very little about Islam, but I know they deny that Jesus is the Son of God who died for our sins and rose again, and that the only way we can be saved is by trusting in him. On this alone I can completely reject Islam as false doctrine.

And you have personally stated in the past that you have not studied Calvinism, it is likely that Quantum has studied more Calvinism than you in a real Bible college. So, your position is very hypocritical to say the least.

I don't know everything about Calvinism, but what little I know is easily recognized as error and unscriptural.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No applause necessary, (for skns attempts) but I catch what you mean here.

The mere fact that skns case is perpetually an out of context argument simply shows me that within the non-cal/arm camp there is no refutation which they bring that is remotely plausible.

But as I understand it, Skan is Orthodox in his Arminian views which is far closer to DOG beliefs than some of these Pelagians & Semi folks are.....there, there is a wide variety of belief mindsets. the synod of Dort (in the early 17th century) was called to respond to the theological deviations of the Arminians......but we have gone down that road many times on BB haven't we.

I'm afraid that HERALD is coming into these conversations very late in the game. Conversations about Gods Sovereignty, God centered vs man centered, Calvinists being robots....what else, 5 points of Calvinism etc... have been gone over ad nasuem. The result is a divided board at each others throats about who's got the bigger God.

For me, I am resolute in my faith beliefs. These discussions have only furthered my resolve. And since I dont try to convert anyone, its just fun to bait & taunt anyone who does.....I'm content! :godisgood:
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't know everything about Calvinism, but what little I know is easily recognized as error and unscriptural.

There you have it....time & again......Mr. I'm right & your wrong! The Pharisee is in the house....Lord be praised!!!!! :laugh:
 

Herald

New Member
I'm afraid that HERALD is coming into these conversations very late in the game. Conversations about Gods Sovereignty, God centered vs man centered, Calvinists being robots....what else, 5 points of Calvinism etc... have been gone over ad nasuem.

For the record, I'm not new to this board. Years ago I was a member under the username "dolous." Unfortunately I forgot my username until Iconoclast reminded me of it.

I realize that the hardcore Arminians and semi-Pelagians on this board are not going to cry out, "Revaco!" I stated in a prior post that my responses are not really for them. Oh, it would be great if they could be persuaded to change their theology; but that aside, my comments are really for the honest inquisitor. Discussion boards usually have more lurkers than participants. They take all this stuff in and process it. If I can have a positive effect on them, then praise God!
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
But as I understand it, Skan is Orthodox in his Arminian views which is far closer to DOG beliefs than some of these Pelagians & Semi folks are.....there, there is a wide variety of belief mindsets. the synod of Dort (in the early 17th century) was called to respond to the theological deviations of the Arminians......but we have gone down that road many times on BB haven't we.

I'm afraid that HERALD is coming into these conversations very late in the game. Conversations about Gods Sovereignty, God centered vs man centered, Calvinists being robots....what else, 5 points of Calvinism etc... have been gone over ad nasuem. The result is a divided board at each others throats about who's got the bigger God.

For me, I am resolute in my faith beliefs. These discussions have only furthered my resolve. And since I dont try to convert anyone, its just fun to bait & taunt anyone who does.....I'm content! :godisgood:

EWF, I respect this immensely.
 
I'm glad you said "many" because "many" doesn't mean "all." :) Just having a bit of fun, my friend.

Truth be told, all always means all; it's just that all doesn't always apply the same way. All can mean everyone, or all of a group. Context determines this.


Are you sure about what you posted there, Brother???

Romans 5:18-20

18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:


Now in verse 19, it states that by one man's disobedience, many were made sinners. But many here does in fact mean "all"........just playin' with ya....I am quite sure you already knew this......I just wanted to point this out.
 
Friend,

The follows texts give me confidence that I am a child of God; one of God's elect:

1 John 5:12 12 He who has the Son has the life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life.

John 20:31 31 but these have been written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.

1 John 5:13 13 These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life.

Romans 10:8-13 8 But what does it say? "THE WORD IS NEAR YOU, IN YOUR MOUTH AND IN YOUR HEART "-- that is, the word of faith which we are preaching, 9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; 10 for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, "WHOEVER BELIEVES IN HIM WILL NOT BE DISAPPOINTED." 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, abounding in riches for all who call on Him; 13 for "WHOEVER WILL CALL ON THE NAME OF THE LORD WILL BE SAVED."

Romans 8:14-16 14 For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God. 15 For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, "Abba! Father!" 16 The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God,

Whether you subscribe to the DoG or not, these texts should provide you with the same assurance and hope that I possess.



I am not DoG, but I say a hearty ((((AMEN)))) to this post!! Here's another dandy to prove we are His.

1 John 3:14 We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.
 
I think the phrase "free offer of the Gospel" has not been properly explained. By "free" I mean that there is no condition placed on the Gospel itself. The Gospel is freely offered. Now, can every person freely receive it? If a Calvinist is truthful the answer will be "no." What should not be confused is the difference between ability and expectation. I know that not everyone will/can respond positively to the freely proclaimed Gospel. However, I have an expectant view of the efficacy of the Gospel. Since I believe the promise made to Abraham, that his descendants will be as numerous as the sand on the seashore, I expect that many will respond.

I actually don't get hung up on the election issue when preaching. I know what I believe about the doctrine. I'm totally convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt about the DoG. But when I preach I call on everyone who hears to repent and believe. I expect God to call His sheep into His flock. Where the Gospel is heard the sheep will be. When the shepherd calls the sheep responds.


You being a DoGer, I know we will have a lot of disagreements, but I have come to a fondness of the way you post on here.


I say the very same thing when God blesses me to proclaim His Gospel.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why study error that is born in the mind of a heretic and propagated by a murderer.

Why must you even go there Robert.....when there are solid Christians affiliated with much of the movement. Are you getting this crud from your Pastor perhaps?

Better you should not react than begin spewing vile commentary. Every time you make comments like that I cringe. Take the higher road & just stop doing it.
 

Tom Butler

New Member
It seems to me that we have gone several pages without dealing with Skandelon's OP.

I hold the view of Particular Redemption (aka Limited Atonement). Here is one of many scripture passages which I believe supports my view:

Isaiah 53:11 "...He shall see the travail of his soul and BE SATISFIED."

In this Suffering Servant passage, it is obvious that Christ's death satisfied the demands of the broken law, and satisfies God's justice.

If God's justice is satisfied for every person without exception, then God cannot justly damn any of them. Now, some may say that condemnation is for rejection of Christ, or continued unbelief. Then those who have never heard of Christ or his gospel have nothing to suffer for in Hell. Unbelief is a sin, and if Christ died for all without exception, his death atoned for the sin of unbelief as much as the other sins. If that's so, then that leaves any who go to Hell without any sins to suffer for.

Many agree with this, but insist that someway, somehow, every person without exception in all the history of the world has heard the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Yet, Paul himself asked (Romans 10) "how can they hear without a preacher."

Further, Romans 2 says there are those who've never heard the law, and they will be judged only by how well they have kept their own moral code.

Thus, from Isaiah 53:11, one may conclude that God's justice is satisfied only for those whom atonement is directed and to whom it will be applied.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
Why must you even go there Robert.....when there are solid Christians affiliated with much of the movement. Are you getting this crud from your Pastor perhaps?

Better you should not react than begin spewing vile commentary. Every time you make comments like that I cringe. Take the higher road & just stop doing it.

Good comment. A wise person will heed such advice.
 

Winman

Active Member
Tom, I believe the answer to unlimited atonement is found in Romans 6. You have to think about it like this, what are the wages of sin? Death. Did Jesus die? Yes. So he paid the penalty for sin.

When we trust Christ, we are baptized into his body by the Spirit, we literally become one with him. So when Jesus died and paid the penalty of sin, we died with him. This is what the scriptures actually say.

Rom 6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
5 For we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

So, when we trust Christ we are born again, we are baptized into Christ, we are one with him.

1 Cor 6:17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.

When Jesus died, if we are in him, we died also. The penalty for our sin has been paid.

Does that mean Jesus's payment is limited? No, anyone can trust Christ if they choose to do so, the payment for their sin has been met by Jesus, Jesus died. No one is prevented from receiving this payment except by their own unwillingness to trust Christ.

If they refuse to receive Jesus, then they must pay the penalty for their sin, death.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oh ok then....from your perspective Christ's work on the cross makes possible for everyone but not actual for anyone in particular.....so although the crucifixion enabled God to grant forgiveness, this is only given on the condition of personal faith.

In summary then, Christ died for each & every person; however only those who believe will be saved. Thus the atonement only becomes effective if and when someone chooses to accept it.
 

Jim1999

<img src =/Jim1999.jpg>
Christ died for all, but instead of some. Its effectiveness is limited to God's elect.

Cheers,

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top