Kerry's hypocrisy

It's more than just Kerry. It's his whole party, crying like babies about this. There are pictures of Bush as Hitler, folks have called him an international terrorist, they accuse him of stealing an election, say he decieved the whole world on purpose, even say he knew about 9/11 before it happened. And the powers in the DNC did nothing, and now want ole 'dubya to step in and stop credible, honored veterans from questioning Kerry's valor. After hearing John Mellencamp call Bush a "thug", on stage, and witnessing Whoopi Goldberg parody him in a way I can't put in print, Kerry said,...

"these people speak from the heart of America"

What a hypocrite.

If you listen really hard, you will hear the shrill cackle of Hillary Clinton, knowing she won't have to run against an incubmant in '08. Could it be she's behind the swifties ?

 

Didn't need to. *edited*

If I were to question his position, I wouldn't know at what point in time to question Waffle King Kerry.


So far, the only consistent things about Kerry & Simple Edwards are they have better hair, they aren't GW Bush, and they are pro-death of the helpless. If those are what you want in the White House, then go for it.


BTW, North didn't come back and label his command and fellow soldiers as butchers and Nazis, Now did he? The man is more Clinton than Clinton.


[ September 07, 2004, 09:53 AM: Message edited by: Gina L ]

 

Didn't need to. You apparently don't understand the terms loyalty or patriotism.</font>[/QUOTE]A fine job of not answering my question.
Once more, please show us how Oliver North, who KNOWINGLY broke the law, exhibited "his loyalty and patriotism" by supplying arms to a sworn enemy of the United States. But wait: he didn't stop there, did he? North then violated the Boland Amendment by diverting the profits to the Contras. Remember, he KNOWINGLY did these things.

Let me ask this differently: how does supplying weapons to our enemies prove one's "loyalty and patriotism?"

See my comments above.

Better hair? When did I mention anything about "better hair?" That is an extraneous subject that you interjected.

No, he topped that: he KNOWINGLY supplied weapons to a sworn enemy of the United States. That is far worse than simply making statements.

Wow, who ever mentioned Clinton?
I know I didn't..........


Now, perhaps you can stop interjecting new people into the discussion and explain to us how Oliver North demonstrated "his loyalty and patriotism."

 

"Better hair" was an attempt at a joke by Kerry, referring to why the Kerry/Edwards team was a better choice....

"we have better ideas concerning the war on terrorism, we have a better plan for the economy, and WE HAVE BETTER HAIR".

carry on.

 

Sure, and that's great.
Now, perhaps Eutychus can show us how Oliver North exhibited "his loyalty and patriotism" by his actions.

 

It very well could be that the Clintons are behind the Swifties. It is a known fact that they do not like Kerry...never have, never will. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if they were. I think all of America found that if there's anything crooked that could be done, it had already been done by the Clintons when they were at 1600 PA Ave.

AVL1984

 

Kerry is worse than Jane Fonda. He's Jane Fonda in drag with a bayonet in the backs of us Vets.

You can run but you can't hide.

The subject is/was "Kerry's hypocrisy." Are you saying that I hijacked this discussion?

 

If you think that giving aid to our sworn enemies is "loyalty and patriotism", then Ollie North is a "loyal patriot."

 

I think that Ollie North is like many (most?) conservative Christians. At heart he truly loves his God and his country, but has a habit of confusing them with the GOP.

 

That might be the case. I would hope so.

 

I am glad you don't take politics seriously, cmg. You have some great one-liners to help lighten things up for those of us who maybe take politics too seriously.

 

Do you think it's true that the reason Kerry was pushed to the fore in 2004 is so that Hillary won't have to deal with a Democratic incumbent in 2008?

It seems that, since there is no serious, credible opposition to the presidency this year, the field will be clear for her when she's ready to take the helm. I mean, if I wanted to choose a team that was sure to blow themselves out of the water, I couldn't make a better choice than Kerry & Edwards.
Nice sacrifice play, if you ask me.

 

Just remember, Eutychus, to not count your chickens before they hatch.

I think that George W. Bush will win but overconfidence will not help him to do so.

 

No, I don't think so. I see no internal Democratic political motive that the Dems would have to cosnpire in such a way on behalf od Clinton. Who would benefit, other than her?

 

That is not surprising since the neo-cons in the Bush administration push an Israel First foreign policy.

 

*not true*

From the CP website:

[ September 07, 2004, 09:56 AM: Message edited by: Gina L ]