1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

KJV Preferred

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by Phillip, Jan 19, 2005.

  1. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    This IS slander. To call ANYONE TODAY a W-H author shows abject ignorance. Sorry. </font>[/QUOTE]Dr. Bob is going to literally kill me (not allegorically). I finally, after all this time, get to correct him just this one time. I better enjoy it because it will never happen again. :D
    Its libel, Dr. Bob, not slander. [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    If I get banned, its been nice knowing all of you. [​IMG]
     
  2. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,162
    Likes Received:
    163
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Dr Bob: "To call ANYONE TODAY a W-H author shows abject ignorance."

    Actually, Dr Bob, there still are some "real" W-H people around. Example: Moises Silva, formerly of Westminster Seminary and of Gordon-Conwell, who wrote in 2002:

    "Let me disabuse you of any thoughts that I am an impartial and objective party in the dispute. The truth is that I am an unrepentant and unshaken Hortian." (in David A. Black, ed., _Rethinking NT Textual Criticism_, Baker, 2002, p.142).
     
  3. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    This IS slander. To call ANYONE TODAY a W-H author shows abject ignorance. Sorry. </font>[/QUOTE]Well, I found a list of names in the website -- the TR/KJV group and W-H group. Let me ask you questions: Do you know that Doug Kutilek is a W-H man?

    Is Dr. D. A. Waite a TR man.

    Is Dr. Metzger a W-H man?

    Is James R. White a W-H man?

    Is Dr. Peter Ruckman a KJVO man?

    Dr. Bob, are you a W-H man?

    Michelle, are you a TR woman?

    Anti-Alexandrain, are you a TR man?

    Pastor Bob, are you a TR man?

    Dr. Bob, I identified them. Am I a slander? No! because I realize that Dog Kutilek is NOT a TR author. YOU know there has 2 sides: the TR/KJV group and W-H/MVs group. Both of them clashed each other on this Bible Version all the time when I read many posts.

    Who suspended Michelle from this BB for 2 weeks? Not TR/KJV moderator! Right? Sense! - because you said I am a slander plus abject ignorance.

    On other "KJV only" board the KJV moderator suspended/kicked out W-H posters, too.

    Dr. Bob, please forgive me. [​IMG]

    [ January 24, 2005, 08:15 PM: Message edited by: Askjo ]
     
  4. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    Correct! In 1800's there was 75% of the TR group and 25% of the W-H group. Today there is 75% of W-H group and 25% of TR group. However the TR group is slowly growing today.

    I was a W-H man for many years ago. Today I am a TR man for many years. Dr. D. A. Waite was a W-H man a long years ago. He is a TR man today. Dr. Frank Logsdon was a W-H man before, but he realized the reason then he turned himself to be a TR man.

    [ January 24, 2005, 08:54 PM: Message edited by: Askjo ]
     
  5. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,864
    Likes Received:
    1,098
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Askjo said:

    "Who suspended Michelle from this BB for 2 weeks? Not TR/KJV moderator! Right? Sense! - because you said I am a slander plus abject ignorance."

    It is best that you not make statements based upon information you do not have.
     
  6. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Agreed, no moderator has the power to suspend a member - it is impossible.

    This thread is on page five and has taken an ugly turn away from its original intent. It is therefore closed.
     
Loading...