NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
Have a great weekend - you know I am praying for you.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God’s timing is always perfect. Jesus came into this world to die for our sins at the very time when Greek had become the trade language of the known world. Even the Jews could read and write Greek. Although Greek was a third language for most of the New Testament writers, they penned their individual contributions to the New Testament in Greek. Although the original autographs are missing, we have thousands of hand-written copies of them that have been preserved. The King James translation of the New Testament was made from some of these preserved copies.If God has preserved (pickled) His Word for us in missing Greek autographs, wouldn't that by default make Him to be a respecter of persons?
Obviously you know nothing at all about Bible translators. Competent Bible translators, of whom there are many, know both Greek and Hebrew infinitely better than you know English, and they know the receptor language very much better than you know English.So are you saying that it is much better for a native English speaking translator, who only learns Greek and Hebrew impersonally as well as the prospective language to then give an accurate translation through all those different langauge qualifications, is better and more accurate than translationing from the scriptures of their native tongue, to those in another language?
This KJVO position is untenable and illogical. If God were to preserve any translation of any Bible it would not be in the English language. For you to believe that, you believe it out of your emotion, sentimentality and deep attachment to a book that you love. But it isn't a logical conclusion as you say it is.Originally posted by michelle:
--------------------------------------------------
Lacy do you agree with this statement: that the King James test is the last and final statement that God has given to the world, and He has given it in the English language, the universal language of the 20th century and that God slammed the door of revelation shut in 389BC and slammed it shut again in 1611?
HankD
--------------------------------------------------
God has made EVIDENT what he has done. I cannot speak for other languages, I can only see the EVIDENCE in my own native language of what He has done, and throughout the history of the churches prior to this in respect to English. I will leave you with this:
Romans 11
33. O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!
34. For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counseller?
35. Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
36. For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.
Love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle
Because KJVOism traced back to the it's father is a form of Anglo-Israeli-ism.Why are you KJVO people so ethnocentric, and just plain arrogant?
Peter Ruckman, The Monarch of Books, Pensacola, 1973, p. 9.The King James test is the last and final statement that God has given to the world, and He has given it in the universal language of the 20th century ... The truth is that God slammed the door of revelation shut in 389BC and slammed it shut again in 1611
That is why I believe that no translation of the Bible can be inspired--only the original autographs, which "holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." And I believe that those holy men of God were the Old Testament prophets, and by extension the New Testament Apostles or authors of the New Testament canon.Originally posted by HankD:
Notice that the 1st time the "door of revelation" was shut was in 389BC at the end of the Old testament canon. But the end of the New testamant canon (or when God shut the "door of revelation" again) according to Dr Ruckman was in 1611 not 90AD when it actually happened. That would call for a Greek NT not an English NT as in 1611.
HankD
That's the problem with the KJVonly sect. 98% of them give the other 2% a bad name."The truth is that God slammed the door of revelation shut in 389BC and slammed it shut again in 1611." Peter Ruckman, The Monarch of Books, Pensacola, 1973, p. 9.