To answer how Calvinism got brought into the mix is that you asked me what this premise was doing for me; I tried to explain that I see it as a logical refute to determinism doctrines and in doing so got things off on the wrong foot, apparently. That is why I admitted it was unfair to do so after realizing you saw it as an offense…
I do appreciate your knowledge and I am truly thankful for input, and think I also share in the frustrations generated by not keeping things on track, and having to deal with arrogance, and so as for problems with each other, I do care and hope things work out to edify. BTW, I did read some of your blog yesterday.
My offer to present scripture was in reference to different types of Devine knowledge, which was the subject of the title, the end of post #8, and this certainly was an effort to get things back track and support my case with the burden of proof, I referred to it in sarcasm as “on a side note”. Hence the frustration of having to deal with every sensitivity that another may have in trying to stick to topic.
I do appreciate your knowledge and I am truly thankful for input, and think I also share in the frustrations generated by not keeping things on track, and having to deal with arrogance, and so as for problems with each other, I do care and hope things work out to edify. BTW, I did read some of your blog yesterday.
My offer to present scripture was in reference to different types of Devine knowledge, which was the subject of the title, the end of post #8, and this certainly was an effort to get things back track and support my case with the burden of proof, I referred to it in sarcasm as “on a side note”. Hence the frustration of having to deal with every sensitivity that another may have in trying to stick to topic.