lack of Scriptural support

Back to KJVonlyism? I thought that was a settled issue? KJV preferred is one thing, but KJVONLY?????? No proof anywhere. . .

 

O.K. you guys enough is enough. I have been watching movies on the AMC channel during December and January. The only movies I have watched are the ones which were in eglish and qouted the KJV of the Bible. Therefore I can say a few things about this unequivicly. First they did speak english in the O.T. & N.T. whether the language was invented yet or not. Second I saw them quote the KJV in the movies both O.T.& N.T., thewrefore the KJV is the only authorized english version of the Bible. How do ya like that for evidence.

 

If it was good e'nuff for Chuck,it's good e'nuff for me!

 

IF it is good enough for Chick Comics,
then it's good enough for me

 

Still no scripture...hummm

 

I respectfully disagree.

Pigs will fly aeons before you get a
supporting scripture or scriptures
from a KJVOist.

 

I was being sarcastic, referring to non-existent posts and putting the burden on the other to find them.

 

I have seen pigs fly!

At our dinner table when we had 10 of our 11 children at home and we had pork chops that night.

HankD

 

LOL Hank!

 

Hank,

You know very well the scriptures and the evidence that has been given, along with many and lengthy reasons why we as servants of our Lord should reject and warn about the mv's. You seem to only want to argue, and make others do double work all for nothing, yet again - even though you are well aware of what has been given. I am NOT GOING THERE AGAIN. Read my response to why I responded with that first post on this thread again. You constantly try to show that we hold to double standards, when it is YOU, and many others who do, along with only desiring to argue, and not really care one iota for the truth.


Some day you will know and hopefully it will not be too late to change on your compromise of the truth.

love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle

 

This whole issue reminds me of the ancient dispute regarding how many angels can fit on the head of a pin.

This looks a lot likke something to do rather than go into all the world, meet sinners, and make disciples of them.

.....thanks

 

Preacher's boy,

Although you have a very good point, the fact is, that these are discussion threads, covering a variety of issues, within the churches and our brothers and sisters in Christ. We are to help edify and love one another, and this issue is a very important one, and one that needs desperately to be discussed.


love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle

 

Preacher's Boy: "This looks a lot likke something to do rather
than go into all the world, meet sinners, and make disciples of them"

In fact, i've been discussing with these folks for 2½-years and
nearly all of them actively attempt to disciple sinners. So this
is really not a discuss Bible Versions or witness --
but that the active witnesses are discussing Bible Versions.

Michelle: "We are to help edify and love
one another, and this issue is a very
important one, and one that needs
desperately to be discussed."

Amen, Sister Michelle -- Preach it!

 

Sure. I'll give you a few, that inform us, and reveal to us, that God has and will provide his word of truth to us faithful perfectly, and anything today that is contrary to the word of God, we will know it, and are to reject it. You can call it KJVonlyism. I call it the word of God onlyism.

Psalms 12

1. Help, Lord; for the godly man ceaseth; for the faithful fail from among the children of men.
2. They speak vanity every one with his neighbour: with flattering lips and with a double heart do they speak.
3. The Lord shall cut off all flattering lips, and the tongue that speaketh proud things:
4. Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own: who is lord over us?
5. For the oppression of the poor, for the sighing of the needy, now will I arise, saith the Lord; I will set him in safety from him that puffeth at him.
6. The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.
8. The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.


Deut. 8

3. And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord doth man live.

Proverbs 30

5. Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
6. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.


Luke 4

4. And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

John 5

8. And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not.
39. Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.


Revelation 22

18. For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
20. He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
21. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.


These are just but a few scriptures I could give you, that inform us of God's word, against that which has tampered with it. It is either the mv's, or it is the KJB. You cannot have it both robycop. You cannot scripturally have it both concerning the truth and concerning the truth about the very scriptures themselves.


love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle

 

Those passages were COMPLETELY TRUE before the KJV existed, thus they cannot be used in support of KJV-onlyism. This is not rocket science.

 

--------------------------------------------------
The KJVO myth has been responsible for tearing apart many churches, especially those of the Baptists, Southern Baptists, and IFB. The CARDINAL PROBLEM with this myth is that there's absolutely NO SCRIPTURAL BASIS for it. Therefore, it's false
--------------------------------------------------


Well robycop, you are free to see it this way, although you might want to make sure that you are on the right side of the division. Truth divides the lie from it. Just something to ponder.

The Lord has said this: Can two walk together unless the be agreed? We are to have the same mind, and that is the mind of Christ, and the unity of the Spirit. This is obviously not the same mind nor spirit. YOu see it as what I and many others recognize as being something to reject scripturally, as believing in false doctrine, when you embrace those things that have disobeyed and been revealed that they are in error, and to which cannot be supported with any scriptural truth. None. And in fact is contrary to, and opposite of the scriptural truth.


love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle

 

--------------------------------------------------
Those passages were COMPLETELY TRUE before the KJV existed, thus they cannot be used in support of KJV-onlyism. This is not rocket science.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Oh they always have been the truth, and ALWAYS WILL be the truth. So, the question I ask you: How come you have not applied then these truths to this issue?


love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
michelle

 

I choose to apply thses verse to the NKJV - case settled and my point is proven.

 

Exactly. They were/are true in Wycliffe's translation, so why was Tyndale's produced? Even so, they were/are still true in Tyndale's translation, so why was the Geneva produced? Even so, they were/are still true in the Geneva translation, so why was the Bishops' produced? Even so, they were/are still true in the Bishops' translation, so why was the KJV produced? Even so, they were/are still true in the KJV, so why was Well's translation produced? Even so, they were/are still true in Well's translation, so why was Purver's translation produced? Even so, they were/are still true in Purver's translation, so why was Webster's produced? Even so, they were/are still true in Webster's translation, so why was Young's produced? Even so, they were/are still true in Young's translation, so why was the Revised Version produced? Even so, they were/are still true in the RV, so why was the ASV produced? Even so they were/are still true in the ASV, etc., etc., etc.

I have. Repeatedly. Emphatically. Just not to a single, exclusive translation, for not even scripture itself does so nor exhorts me to. To do so is to go beyond what scripture says.