• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Latinos Outraged By 'Anchor Baby' Term, See It As Offensive

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
Okay, if you are offended by the term "anchor baby"

lets use this term: "Loophole baby"


Crabby, ITL, Zaac ...

So if someone breaks into your house and eats your food - you would have no problem with that?
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Okay, if you are offended by the term "anchor baby"

lets use this term: "Loophole baby"


Crabby, ITL, Zaac ...

Just call them what they are ... a baby.

So if someone breaks into your house and eats your food - you would have no problem with that?

I fail to see the connection between this question and the topic of the thread. I do not believe the 14th amendment speaks to someone breaking into my house. Correct me if I am mistaken.

 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
1+ANCHOR+BABIE+Anchor-Babies.gif
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
And the left wing kills them inside the womb.

Last time I checked, Republican right wing women were getting abortions too.

I don't have any issue with the hyphenated Americans. I am Irish-American. I am proud of my heritage. We came here from Ireland, landed on Ellis Island legally. Almost all African-American was brought here as the result of slavery, they can be called anything they choose. I'm good with that. The left is the ones who hate any kind of cultural identification, hence their hatred of the stars and bars.

The left has good reason to reject a flag that was put up in objection to integration all across the South. The Right should be embarrassed for supporting such a thing. But then again, that's the same Right that really goes along with the stuff Trump has been saying and seemingly has no problem with the comments to enslave folks again by a right wing talk show host.

We can call the parents of these babies illegal-Americans. And we can call the left wing Idiotic-Americans. :)

Then I guess you might as well call the Right wing the same because ain't much difference in the two...at least not with the public faces.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Okay, if you are offended by the term "anchor baby"

lets use this term: "Loophole baby"

Baby will suffice. For some reason, if the GOP doesn't like someone, they want to attach these demeaning terms. Just doesn't seem to be very Christlike.


Crabby, ITL, Zaac ...

So if someone breaks into your house and eats your food - you would have no problem with that?

37“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

40“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’

41“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

44“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

45“He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

46“Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”
Matthew 25:37-46

Perhaps if you and some of your GOP brethren weren't so mean, selfish and nasty, he wouldn't need to break in.

As it stands,if I were there and he was breaking in for food, then I'd help him pack it. I AM the Church and we are called to care for the poor.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Crabby, ITL, Zaac ...

So if someone breaks into your house and eats your food - you would have no problem with that?

Not so much. Now, if they broke into my house, gave birth, ran away and left the baby to live with me--problem!
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
I have a question. I know I always have questions. Just my nature I guess but this question is for Crabby the lefties and the Latinos that are all upset over a couple words.

Crabby,

Why aren't you, the lefties and the Latinos upset over this?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/08/crimes-against-humanity-01-poverty-murder-over-400-million-people-since-1995-more-than-all-wars-in-recorded-history.html

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2252393#post2252393

You claim to care so much about the poor and oppressed but I've never seen you address this. Why is that?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have a question. I know I always have questions. Just my nature I guess but this question is for Crabby the lefties and the Latinos that are all upset over a couple words.

Crabby,

Why aren't you, the lefties and the Latinos upset over this?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/08/crimes-against-humanity-01-poverty-murder-over-400-million-people-since-1995-more-than-all-wars-in-recorded-history.html

You claim to care so much about the poor and oppressed but I've never seen you address this. Why is that?

Liberals are trying to rectify that through the global warming hysteria to create a world tax on American wealth to redistribute it to other countries that liberals fight to keep them from industrializing.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Liberals are trying to rectify that through the global warming hysteria to create a world tax on American wealth to redistribute it to other countries that liberals fight to keep them from industrializing.

I'd still like to see Crabby's answer. A real answer not the usual "that's off topic" non answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Liberals are trying to rectify that through the global warming hysteria to create a world tax on American wealth to redistribute it to other countries that liberals fight to keep them from industrializing.

And folk like you hate to face real issues and continually attempt to derail threads. Shame on you!!!
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
And folk like you hate to face real issues and continually attempt to derail threads. Shame on you!!!

Why are you refusing to face a real issue (supposedly one close to your own heart) to push an agenda to demonize people for using certain words?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why are you refusing to face a real issue (supposedly one close to your own heart) to push an agenda to demonize people for using certain words?

Like most liberals, Crabby thinks he can kick that mushy cow-patty out of his way without getting any of it on his shoes; IOW, ignore the points he cannot legitimately respond to and WA-LA, it disappears!!:BangHead:
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Like most liberals, Crabby thinks he can kick that mushy cow-patty out of his way without getting any of it on his shoes; IOW, ignore the points he cannot legitimately respond to and WA-LA, it disappears!!:BangHead:

There does appear to be a pattern of that in Crabby's threads.

Liberals Suddenly Concerned About Babies and "Tiny Humans" That Should Be "Cherished and Valued"

Liberals are outraged. No, it isn't about Planned Parenthood sorting parts of babies in pie pans and selling them at a profit. And no, they aren't outraged over the abortion giant selling whole baby cadavers in order to keep body parts "intact." Nor are they outraged over Planned Parenthood cutting out the brains of babies while their hearts are still beating.

They are, however, suddenly concerned about babies of illegal immigrants born in the United States being called "anchor babies" by GOP presidential candidates.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/08/21/liberals-all-the-sudden-concerned-about-babies-and-tiny-humans-that-should-be-nurtured-n2041427?utm_source=BreakingOnTownhallWidget_4&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=BreakingOnTownhall

Maybe the reason Crabby chooses to "clam up" when asked legitimate questions about liberal demonization campaigns is because even he realizes there's no defense for cold blooded hypocritical liberal insanity?

How anyone who claims to be a Christian can take part in and seek to defend an anti human philosophy and agenda covered only by a thin and obviously false veil of "caring for the poor and the children" is beyond my powers of comprehension.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There does appear to be a pattern of that in Crabby's threads.

Liberals Suddenly Concerned About Babies and "Tiny Humans" That Should Be "Cherished and Valued"

Liberals are outraged. No, it isn't about Planned Parenthood sorting parts of babies in pie pans and selling them at a profit. And no, they aren't outraged over the abortion giant selling whole baby cadavers in order to keep body parts "intact." Nor are they outraged over Planned Parenthood cutting out the brains of babies while their hearts are still beating.

They are, however, suddenly concerned about babies of illegal immigrants born in the United States being called "anchor babies" by GOP presidential candidates.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/08/21/liberals-all-the-sudden-concerned-about-babies-and-tiny-humans-that-should-be-nurtured-n2041427?utm_source=BreakingOnTownhallWidget_4&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=BreakingOnTownhall

Maybe the reason Crabby chooses to "clam up" when asked legitimate questions about liberal demonization campaigns is because even he realizes there's no defense for cold blooded hypocritical liberal insanity?

How anyone who claims to be a Christian can take part in and seek to defend an anti human philosophy and agenda covered only by a thin and obviously false veil of "caring for the poor and the children" is beyond my powers of comprehension.

And why do you care nothing about how the child is treated once it is born?
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
And why do you care nothing about how the child is treated once it is born?

I already addressed that accusation by proving that I care more about them than you do.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/08/crimes-against-humanity-01-poverty-murder-over-400-million-people-since-1995-more-than-all-wars-in-recorded-history.html

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2252393#post2252393

Now why don't you tell us why you only care about certain children after they're born? And then only after they are used as part of a demonization campaign against your political opponents? Why don't you tell us why you only choose to go on crusades to demonize people and words used by your political opponents instead of going on a crusade to fight the real causes of global poverty to help the millions of children that suffer and die from them every year?

Why do you ignore the very real issues and the biggest causes of children's suffering and death and use only certain children as pawns to demonize your political opponents if you care so much about children after they're born?

Explain yourself Crabby.

We're all waiting . . . and I'm sure we'll have a long wait.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Poncho:
There does appear to be a pattern of that in Crabby's threads.

You know, this is SO characteristic of him, that I'm truly surprised that he is still allowed post here.

The only time he posts without kindergarten tactics (my daddy can beat your daddy) is when he's quoting Confucius or some such heathen.

C'mon MODS, can't you give Crabby a little push toward maturity?? I'm sure he will thank you in the long run, and the rest of us would appreciate it tremendously NOW!:tongue3:
 
Top