The link doesn't work.
I keep thijnking what you said, but why would a P.A. judge do this ?
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]On            September 29, 2008 Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg, filed a response            to a motion to dismiss by defendant Barack Obama who was joined in his            effort to quash Berg's lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee,            claiming it has no standing to proceed. Berg argued in the brief response            that he has provided the precedents which establish the standing and            petitioned US District Court Judge R. Barclay Surrick of the Eastern            District of Pennsylvania to pursue the case. In his Sept. 29 filing,            Berg said: "Plaintiff served discovery in way of Admissions            and Request for Production of Documents, on Defendants on September            15, 2008 and has attempted to obtain verification of Obama's eligibility            through subpoenas to the government entities and the hospital's in Hawaii.            To date, Plaintiffs and two of (2) the locations, which subpoenas were            served upon, refused to honor the subpoenas.[/FONT]
         [FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]"For            the above aforementioned reasons, Plaintiff respectfully request Defendants            and the Democratic National Committee's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to            F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) be denied and order immediate discovery            (the unsigned order requiring Obama to produce..." within three            (3) days{[/FONT]
         [FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]1.            Obama's "vault" version (certified copy of his "original"            long version) birth certificate; and
          2. a certified copy of Obama's Certificate of Citizenship;
          3. a certified copy of Obama's oath of allegiance."[/FONT]
         [FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The            certified copy of the citizen of the world's "oath of            allegiance" to the United Sates is a document attesting to the            fact that the newly "naturalized" citizen (usually an immigrant            who has just been granted citizenship) or for native born Americans            who have forfeited or otherwise surrendered their citizenship, and have            requested reinstatement at their majority, usually 18, has sworn allegiance            to the United States and its Constitution.[/FONT]
         [FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]In            this filing, Berg argued that he has legal standing to bring suit against            Obama—and the DNC—pursuant to 5 USC §702; 524 US 11            (1998); 8 USC §148(b); 5 USC §552(B); 28 USC §1343 and            also standing pursuant to Federal Question Jurisdiction. Berg rightfully            claimed he has suffered "...the kind of injury that Congress            expected might be addressed under the statute..." since the            issue of where Obama was born with conflicting birth certificates and            conflicting claims of what hospital Obama was born in—with Obama's            own family members claiming he was born at three different hospitals            in two countries.[/FONT]
         [FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]The            Obama "Birth Flap" was not of Berg's making. It began in June            when National Review's Jim Geraghty raised the question and asked the            Obama Campaign to release a copy of his birth certificate in order to            prove that he actually was born in the United States. (Reports had previously            surfaced claiming that Obama's Kenyan grandmother, Sarah Hussein Obama,            told reporters that Obama was not born in Hawaii, but in Kenya. She            also reportedly told reporters that when her son, Barack Hussein Obama,            Sr. returned to Kenya he was accompanied by his pregnant white wife            who was close to term.)...