• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Letter to a Greek Orthodox Church

Status
Not open for further replies.

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The reason so many have "targeted" Evan is becasue this is his "MO" constantly asking for advice -but not taking it.- Some have surmised that he is only looking for people to agree with him. We do NOT take pleasure in yanking his chain. We have simply tired of his complaining of his life situations in spite of NOT taking good solid Biblical advice. As far as Street preaching - we are not against it! - But Evans thinking is apparently is that if you are not street preaching you are not following Mark 16:15. Yet, he himself disregards Mat 28 :19-20 (Making disciples). Evan has stated discipleship - is not his gift. That I can understand - but that is not an excuse to not even try. Over the years, I have heard many people say - " I do not have the gift of {fill in the blank}, but when I did attempt it the Lord has bless me!"

So NO - we are not jealous that we dont do street evangelism - many of us simply believe it is not that effective in this day and age as it has been in past decades. We have tried to show Evan - that other forms of Evangelism CAN be more effective- but apparently he will not even consider it.

At first, I was surprised that several others have not posted here- but then I suppose that several of them have given up - could be that their heads still hurt from banging their heads constantly against the wall.

Wrong wrong. I never once said if you do not street preach you are not obeying Mark 1615!

Also I am not a pragmatist. And I do take Matt 2818-20 seriously. It's just I have no opportunities. But.... when I go out witnessing there may sprout a discipleship opportunity or when I write letters. I have written many individuals as well you know.

You assume things!!!!!!!!
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
People here are not largely against letter writing anymore than those who disagreed with you in the past about certain books are against reading books (something that you charged them with at the time). Some disagree with you that we should be writing letters to false churches as this principle is absent in Scripture (it is not evangelism as one cannot witness to an organization). Others seem to insist that the practice is not effective. It all goes back to you being faithful to the call and purpose that God has given you (making sure, of course, it is faithful to His Word) and allowing others to do the same. Too often we look for others to be like us, but in the Body of Christ we all have different functions. The "eye" shouldn't demand the "ear" to see, for example).

True. I have my gift and I can't demand those on this board to see like me because they are not me.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The reason so many have "targeted" Evan is becasue this is his "MO" constantly asking for advice -but not taking it.

That describes many of the posters here. Nothing wrong with asking people their views on something. And remember, this is a debate forum. I often start threads posed in questions, have my own views, and debate the views presented. A few you might remember are "Were Men Born Again Before Pentecost?" and "Who Populates the Millennial Kingdom."

I am not asking for advice, but seeking to discuss and debate the issues.

Secondly, is it often seen that after Thread Title questions are posed, within the course of the thread conclusions are drawn, so someone who might not be sure when asking the OP question may form an opinion (which could be based on a number of things, hopefully Scripture topping the list) and take a decisive position.


Some have surmised that he is only looking for people to agree with him.

Also describes many of the posters here.

The question is...why one person would be targeted.


We do NOT take pleasure in yanking his chain.

Well, I will admit I will not hesitate to yank chains, it becomes obvious with certain members that debate and discussion is not what they are here for, and the general course of action is to stop interacting with that member, not...continually hound them.

Step back, and wait until they grow up a little (if your opinion is that they are immature). But, since you mention the importance of discipleship, I will remind you that a good teacher teaches despite whether the student knows they are being taught or not.

And at the heart of making disciples and discipling is a sincere concern for the spiritual state of the individual God introduces us to.


We have simply tired of his complaining of his life situations in spite of NOT taking good solid Biblical advice.

First, who judges that "good Biblical advice" has been given? If the subject does not feel it is good advice, there is nothing you can do to change that.

Secondly, I see nothing good in constant harassment. That is only going to encourage the antagonist to do the same. We are saved, but we still have fallible tendencies, and it is just human nature to recompense evil with evil.

Third, Evan writes letters, which is another means of Evangelism, and here is the response...

How many such letters have you written
How many responses have you have from said letters?

Why would you be against writing letters? Is that much different than posting on this forum? Why not encourage him in this, what would it hurt?


As far as Street preaching - we are not against it!

That is not what I have seen in the past (and I am not speaking of you specifically, Salty). A general discouragement of something that takes quite a bit of courage, and an effort that is rare in the Body of Christ today.

Getting deja vu...because I have said all this before.


But Evans thinking is apparently is that if you are not street preaching you are not following Mark 16:15.

Okay, if that be true, then that is on him, it has nothing to do with you, nor is it a reason for you not to hold up the Biblical example given us in Scripture for exhortation and edification...of the Body.

And he is a member, right?

Personally, I am glad to have such a brother, though we may not always agree, and if there is anything I can do to encourage him in his efforts I will do that.


Yet, he himself disregards Mat 28 :19-20 (Making disciples).

I hate to say it, Salty, but it seems you are not doing so well at that either, at least where he is concerned.


Evan has stated discipleship - is not his gift. That I can understand - but that is not an excuse to not even try.

Sometimes it is. Sometimes the most useful thing some members (of the Body of Christ, not this Forum) can do is to...keep their mouth shut, lol.

Sometimes when a novice (in any given area) seeks to do "the Will of God," their efforts are in the flesh and great harm can be the result. I have been guilty of that.


Over the years, I have heard many people say - " I do not have the gift of {fill in the blank}, but when I did attempt it the Lord has bless me!"

And I have heard people boast of what they have done.

There is no cut and dry in regards to matters like these, and discretion is always going to be the better part of valor.


So NO - we are not jealous that we dont do street evangelism - many of us simply believe it is not that effective in this day and age as it has been in past decades.

Why would you think that. That astounds me.

Is it because Hollywood caricaturizes Street Evangelism with bums wearing signs that say "The End is Near!"?

Whatever area one is gifted in, it is just common sense that practice makes perfect, lol.


We have tried to show Evan - that other forms of Evangelism CAN be more effective- but apparently he will not even consider it.

And I would disagree with that: there is no singular most effective or "more effective" means of Evangelism...is it a many faceted gem.

All Evangelism is dependent on the Comforter Who is the One Who takes what we say, what we write, and uses that truth in the process of enlightenment for both the natural man as well as the spiritual.


At first, I was surprised that several others have not posted here- but then I concluded that several of them have given up

And that is the proper course.

Don't take this wrong, but I view the consistent pattern as a result of both parties, and it will not stop until something changes. Those who have ceased to participate are doing the right thing, and if all did, then I guarantee there would be a change in the pattern, and who knows what the new pattern will be like? I say...give it a try.


could be that their heads still hurt from banging their heads constantly against the wall.

This assumes that they held the higher ground, and perhaps at times they did, but, if we incite someone constantly we are going to drive them into a habit of being on the defensive, and that is antithetical to growth, in my opinion.

I will say that more than once I would not view them to be be on higher ground, just trifling.

And I don't say all of this to anger you, or anyone else, just letting you know what I see.


God bless.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What is also true is that Evan is targeted by a certain crowd who seems to take pleasure in yanking his chain, so, it is no wonder that one would not often take advice from people who are usually antagonistic towards him.
I disagree with this broad characterization.

While there certainly are a few who are fed up with him and are sometimes not their best selves, many of us have treated him respectfully only to be attacked. He does not handle differences of opinion and method well and is more than 50% of the problem.

He reaps what he sows. As believers, we should be better than our attackers, but we fail at that sometimes. It is easier for me not to engage with him than to offer my best advice/opinion and be attacked for it.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I disagree with this broad characterization.

And...?

Both you and Salty have confirmed what I said. How can you disagree with something you agree with?

And I quote:


While there certainly are a few who are fed up with him and are sometimes not their best selves,

And...?

How is that relevant to my "broad characterization?"

What I have witnessed I have witnessed, and continue to witness it.


many of us have treated him respectfully only to be attacked.

And when that happens we...?

Look, it's a debate Forum, lol. Get used to people disagreeing with you and not understanding you mean to be respectful. Practice at making what you say to other members inescapably respectful, and if it is not received...move on.


He does not handle differences of opinion and method well and is more than 50% of the problem.

Its not a blame game, BB. If we are the Body of Christ our responsibility is to that which we are commanded, and I don't see anything about harassment being a game or that it edifies the Body.


He reaps what he sows.

Don't we all? lol


As believers, we should be better than our attackers,

Bingo.


but we fail at that sometimes.

But we don't dwell on our failures, right? And we certainly do not dwell on the failures of others.


It is easier for me not to engage with him than to offer my best advice/opinion and be attacked for it.

And that is what I have said. If you keep stirring a pot don't be surprised if the stew overcooks and you're left with something you can't swallow, lol.


God bless.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How is that relevant to my "broad characterization?"
Because you have made a broad claim that is an exaggeration of what really happens.

Look, it's a debate Forum, lol. Get used to people disagreeing with you and not understanding you mean to be respectful. Practice at making what you say to other members inescapably respectful, and if it is not received...move on.
I'm quite capable of letting things go, but we are also called to hold each other to account for how we act. You cannot disagree with that, because that is the basis of the conversation we are having now.

The community of Baptist Board is holding our evangelist friend accountable. I think you should be okay with that as long as it does not get out of hand. And for what it's worth, I've jumped into the fray to defend our evangelist friend more than a few times when things got heated.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
While there certainly are a few who are fed up with him and are sometimes not their best selves, many of us have treated him respectfully only to be attacked. He does not handle differences of opinion and method well and is more than 50% of the problem.

He reaps what he sows. As believers, we should be better than our attackers, but we fail at that sometimes. It is easier for me not to engage with him than to offer my best advice/opinion and be attacked for it.

A lot of truth here.
Bottom line - why do Evan ask for advice when he knows he will not take it?

Also I notice that he will only answer certain questions - answers to questions to prove his point.
(Darrel - I know you asked a lot of questions - will try to answer - when I have lots of time)

In the past I have "given up" on Evan - but then later it appeared he was coming around- so I came back - but as time went on - I was gravely disappointed.

I would like to say that many on this board (much more qualified than me) have give Evan Godly advice -and all ignored.

Let me close with this - I used to be a Newspaper District Advisor for the Winston-Salem Journal Sentinel.

One of my paperboys - was having trouble collecting money from his customers. Without collect all customers - he would not be making any money. He called me for some help- told him, I would be glad to help - BUT - we would do it my way - -or should I say the best way - because it was effective, due to the extensive experience I had in the paper business Well, the young man agreed - by Sat Evening- my paper boy had made his first profit. He was so glad he listened to me.

Now, on the other hand - I often ask for advice - and I listen and act upon good and Godly advice.

So, Evan - the ball is now in your court.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Because you have made a broad claim that is an exaggeration of what really happens.

Its not exaggerated, and you know it.

And I quote:

And for what it's worth, I've jumped into the fray to defend our evangelist friend more than a few times when things got heated.

I'm quite capable of letting things go, but we are also called to hold each other to account for how we act.

For the most part, true, but, I view Forums as being responsible to have Moderation which addresses issues like that.

One forum had a Moderator that simply posted...

Address the Post not the Poster!

Miss that guy.


You cannot disagree with that, because that is the basis of the conversation we are having now.

I have no intention of disagreeing with it...what do you think I am doing now?

;)


The community of Baptist Board is holding our evangelist friend accountable.

For what?

Because he wastes his time writing letters?

You are not going to change the fact that there has been blatant antagonism which is not healthy in an environment that should be focused on discussing and debating Christian Doctrine.

Kind of goes against the point of being here, does it not?


I think you should be okay with that as long as it does not get out of hand.

As far as I am concerned, because it has been going on so long...it is out of hand.


And for what it's worth, I've jumped into the fray to defend our evangelist friend more than a few times when things got heated.

And I applaud you for that.

Look, there is nothing wrong with trying to "help" someone "see the light," lol, but, we have to know when it is best to stop interacting with certain members. If we do that, my bet is that things will change. It's too easy to let annoyance and agitation impact what we do here, how we post, and how we interact with others, and that is something we have to be diligent about.

As I said before, discretion is always going to be the better part of valor.


God bless.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Its not exaggerated, and you know it.
No. I don't "know" that. Why do you assume I am being less than honest when I see nuance and you see extremes?

You enjoyed quoting me to "prove" your point, but you are mischaracterizing it by taking it out of the context of what I previously wrote. Does it get heated an a little unfair sometimes? Yes. Is it a broad and consistent pattern among those who interact with him? No.

For the most part, true, but, I view Forums as being responsible to have Moderation which addresses issues like that.
You are referring to situations that violate the spirit of dialogue in a moderated group, not theology, ministry and life outside of the group. We are called to hold each other accountable there as well.

Because he wastes his time writing letters?
I am not a big fan of writing letters to, as he puts it, "false churches", simply because it is ineffective and does not require anything of him except time and postage. If one is really going to be salt and light, one much get engaged. If you believe someone is in a false religion or is straying from biblical values, get involved in their life and immerse them in the reality of the Father, Son and Spirit at work in the world ("immersing them in the presence/power of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit" - Matthew 28:19).

I have done that with unchurched people, people from various denominations, Mormons, self-styled satanists, wiccans, etc. It is quite successful since it is exactly what Jesus directed us to do.

You are not going to change the fact that there has been blatant antagonism which is not healthy in an environment that should be focused on discussing and debating Christian Doctrine
Of course not.

Kind of goes against the point of being here, does it not
Yet you opened this response to me with the suggestion that I was not being honest instead of simply having a different perspective.

As far as I am concerned, because it has been going on so long...it is out of hand.
Isn't that the job of a moderator - the persons who have invested of themselves and follow certain groups carefully? I don't often see things get abusive toward our evangelist friend. When I see it, I say something.

It's too easy to let annoyance and agitation impact what we do here, how we post, and how we interact with others, and that is something we have to be diligent about.
True. Be sure to carefully examine the beam in your own eye before you pick at the mote in someone else's eye.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. I don't "know" that. Why do you assume I am being less than honest when I see nuance and you see extremes?

You enjoyed quoting me to "prove" your point, but you are mischaracterizing it by taking it out of the context of what I previously wrote. Does it get heated an a little unfair sometimes? Yes. Is it a broad and consistent pattern among those who interact with him? No.


You are referring to situations that violate the spirit of dialogue in a moderated group, not theology, ministry and life outside of the group. We are called to hold each other accountable there as well.


I am not a big fan of writing letters to, as he puts it, "false churches", simply because it is ineffective and does not require anything of him except time and postage. If one is really going to be salt and light, one much get engaged. If you believe someone is in a false religion or is straying from biblical values, get involved in their life and immerse them in the reality of the Father, Son and Spirit at work in the world ("immersing them in the presence/power of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit" - Matthew 28:19).

I have done that with unchurched people, people from various denominations, Mormons, self-styled satanists, wiccans, etc. It is quite successful since it is exactly what Jesus directed us to do.


Of course not.


Yet you opened this response to me with the suggestion that I was not being honest instead of simply having a different perspective.


Isn't that the job of a moderator - the persons who have invested of themselves and follow certain groups carefully? I don't often see things get abusive toward our evangelist friend. When I see it, I say something.


True. Be sure to carefully examine the beam in your own eye before you pick at the mote in someone else's eye.

Tell you what, BB, I will simply monitor the interaction and comment as appropriate.

Fair enough?

I have not questioned your honesty at all (perhaps you cannot see that what I have said has been verified), and I have no real interest or opinion in what your opinion of writing letters is. Its okay if others think it a waste of time.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
For the most part, true, but, I view Forums as being responsible to have Moderation which addresses issues like that.

You are referring to situations that violate the spirit of dialogue in a moderated group, not theology, ministry and life outside of the group.

I will quickly comment on this, as it holds relevance to the discussion: who decides what "the spirit" of dialogue should be, and when that is violated? Debate is going to have two opposing views...always. I have been accused numerous times of "getting mad," or slandering (such as you're suggesting I have questioned your honesty), and that is not the case.

The Body of Christ has leadership, and whether that is in a church fellowship, or a Forum, if it is a Christian Environment then it falls under Christian guidelines, and thus needs to have an authority that can justly mediate discussion and debate. And I'll be honest, when people are targeted over matters of opinion, as I said before, I view that as trifling.

How one defines what is "violating the spirit of dialogue" is not something as cut and dry as we might think. If someone points out another is teaching heresy, for example, or false doctrine, or corrupting Doctrine, the one accused may think it a "violation," when in fact it might be true. That is where capable leadership steps in and does not just give an opinion, but, from the Word of GOd, shows what is true or not.


God bless.
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A lot of truth here.
Bottom line - why do Evan ask for advice when he knows he will not take it?

Also I notice that he will only answer certain questions - answers to questions to prove his point.
(Darrel - I know you asked a lot of questions - will try to answer - when I have lots of time)

In the past I have "given up" on Evan - but then later it appeared he was coming around- so I came back - but as time went on - I was gravely disappointed.

I would like to say that many on this board (much more qualified than me) have give Evan Godly advice -and all ignored.

Let me close with this - I used to be a Newspaper District Advisor for the Winston-Salem Journal Sentinel.

One of my paperboys - was having trouble collecting money from his customers. Without collect all customers - he would not be making any money. He called me for some help- told him, I would be glad to help - BUT - we would do it my way - -or should I say the best way - because it was effective, due to the extensive experience I had in the paper business Well, the young man agreed - by Sat Evening- my paper boy had made his first profit. He was so glad he listened to me.

Now, on the other hand - I often ask for advice - and I listen and act upon good and Godly advice.

So, Evan - the ball is now in your court.

[Edited] I ask for a debate or discussion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

reformed_baptist

Member
Site Supporter
Are you calling me a liar?

errr....can you please point out where I have called you anything of the sort?

I asked you a perfectly legitimate question considering your previous response to me (and provided my reasoning) - so again, as I would love to talk theology with you can you please point me to such a thread so that you and I might have a constructive conversation?
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
To those responding to Daryl - there is some merit to what he's observed. Those that have offered advice and opinions to Evangelist--that Evan has decided he doesn't agree with, or that he doesn't appreciate the"tone"--have been rewarded with "go chase a rabbit" or "you lie" or "untrue" or "lies." Rather than just let it go, many of us who have received such responses tend to provide our opinion of the response, and the nature of a person who would respond in such a way.

I mean, let's face it: when asked for opinion, debate, and discussion; how should you react when you get opinion, debate, and discussion that doesn't agree with your pre-conceived notions? Or is in a hurtful tone?

Daryl - some of the first threads Evangelist started revolved around whether he should marry a woman he met on an internet dating site. While I could go look those up, I'd rather ask: did you participate in those threads? Or observe them? Or how about the ones more recently where he asked for opinions about leaving his wife's church? Or even more recently where he asked for opinions about divorcing his wife? (I think maybe I recall some resonse(s) from you about that last one)

I epitomize some of what Daryl has "observed." But I tend to follow the principles of Proverbs 26:4-5; and I've had a lot of experience interacting with Evangelist, as both trying to be supportive and as antagonist. Mainly, these days, I just interject commentary that's an observation of his post (wording, content, tone, etc.). Rather than consider the observatory comment, I usually get rewarded with "Don's just a critic." But I stress: my guiding principle is Proverbs 26:4-5.

If folks who take issue with him would stop responding to Evan, it would be interesting to see how long he stays around....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top