Lewis vs Christ

That's your interpretation of what's implied. I suggest that Lewis' allegories are, to use Ransom's word, slipshod, and do not necessarily correspond to a systematic theology, which Lewis never attempted to come to grips with.

A good deal of Lewis' work was "thinking out loud," and I think he would be horrified to think he was being held up as a standard of theology. He had his biases, which are evident in his work, but you can also find Calvinism in his writings even though he was Arminian.

I don't go to Lewis for theology, except that he upheld the basic tenets of orthodoxy at a time when it was almost unheard of in the British popular press. I find insights, some of which I use, some of which I discard.